Re: On the (ab)use of the Urgency field

2012-06-22 Thread Andreas Metzler
In gmane.linux.debian.devel.general Ian Jackson ijack...@chiark.greenend.org.uk wrote: [...] On previous occasions the release team have said that the freeze would be applied with respect to the /upload/ date, rather than the /migration/ date. Ie, packages uploaded before the freeze might

Re: On the (ab)use of the Urgency field

2012-06-20 Thread Eric Dorland
* Adam D. Barratt (a...@adam-barratt.org.uk) wrote: Hi, I realise everyone's waiting for news of the freeze (we're working on it...) but please bear in mind that this is not an appropriate use of the Urgency field: * Urgency high to beat the freeze. As mentioned in the last mail we

Re: On the (ab)use of the Urgency field

2012-06-20 Thread Neil McGovern
On Wed, Jun 20, 2012 at 02:35:41AM -0400, Eric Dorland wrote: It looks like my recent libassa upload fell afoul of this, but it does in fact fix a release critical bug in libassa 3.5.1-1. The -dev package is missing a dependency that makes building against the library impossible. The changelog

On the (ab)use of the Urgency field

2012-06-19 Thread Adam D. Barratt
Hi, I realise everyone's waiting for news of the freeze (we're working on it...) but please bear in mind that this is not an appropriate use of the Urgency field: * Urgency high to beat the freeze. As mentioned in the last mail we sent to d-d-a (and several at various points before that)

Re: On the (ab)use of the Urgency field

2012-06-19 Thread Tshepang Lekhonkhobe
On 19/06/2012 13:08, Adam D. Barratt wrote: Hi, I realise everyone's waiting for news of the freeze (we're working on it...) but please bear in mind that this is not an appropriate use of the Urgency field: * Urgency high to beat the freeze. As mentioned in the last mail we sent to d-d-a (and

Re: On the (ab)use of the Urgency field

2012-06-19 Thread Martin Zobel-Helas
Hi, On Tue Jun 19, 2012 at 13:16:33 +0200, Tshepang Lekhonkhobe wrote: On 19/06/2012 13:08, Adam D. Barratt wrote: Hi, I realise everyone's waiting for news of the freeze (we're working on it...) but please bear in mind that this is not an appropriate use of the Urgency field: *

Re: On the (ab)use of the Urgency field

2012-06-19 Thread Adam D. Barratt
On 19.06.2012 12:16, Tshepang Lekhonkhobe wrote: On 19/06/2012 13:08, Adam D. Barratt wrote: I realise everyone's waiting for news of the freeze (we're working on it...) but please bear in mind that this is not an appropriate use of the Urgency field: * Urgency high to beat the freeze. As

Re: On the (ab)use of the Urgency field

2012-06-19 Thread Ian Jackson
Adam D. Barratt writes (On the (ab)use of the Urgency field): I realise everyone's waiting for news of the freeze (we're working on it...) but please bear in mind that this is not an appropriate use of the Urgency field: * Urgency high to beat the freeze. As mentioned in the last