On 20.01.2011 08:06, tony mancill wrote:
On 01/19/2011 10:36 PM, Florian Weimer wrote:
* tony mancill:
On 01/14/2011 11:46 AM, Florian Weimer wrote:
* tony mancill:
As per Section 5.8.5 of the Developer's Reference, I'd like to get
confirmation from the Security Team that they are
On 01/14/2011 11:46 AM, Florian Weimer wrote:
* tony mancill:
As per Section 5.8.5 of the Developer's Reference, I'd like to get
confirmation from the Security Team that they are anticipating and
approve of the upload of the new source version. (My apologies if this
has already been
* tony mancill:
On 01/14/2011 11:46 AM, Florian Weimer wrote:
* tony mancill:
As per Section 5.8.5 of the Developer's Reference, I'd like to get
confirmation from the Security Team that they are anticipating and
approve of the upload of the new source version. (My apologies if this
has
On 01/19/2011 10:36 PM, Florian Weimer wrote:
* tony mancill:
On 01/14/2011 11:46 AM, Florian Weimer wrote:
* tony mancill:
As per Section 5.8.5 of the Developer's Reference, I'd like to get
confirmation from the Security Team that they are anticipating and
approve of the upload of the
* Matthias Klose:
get the files from testing/unstable touch debian/control.in
debian/rules debian/control
I end up with this:
mkdir -p /tmp/buildd/openjdk-6-6b18-1.8.3/build/plugin/icedteanp \
cd /tmp/buildd/openjdk-6-6b18-1.8.3/build/plugin/icedteanp \
On Sun, Jan 16, 2011 at 05:10:39 +0100, Matthias Klose wrote:
On 14.01.2011 20:46, Florian Weimer wrote:
Do you plane to switch to IcedTea 1.9 or a later version during the
squeeze release?
I will not do this myself, altough I would welcome this. Apparently
Debian does allow these kind of
Hi Florian,
On Sun, Jan 16, 2011 at 10:56 AM, Florian Weimer f...@deneb.enyo.de wrote:
I suppose we need to disable building the plugin on lenny (it's in a
separate package there anyway, I think). Is there an easy way to do
this?
I think there is some code in debian/rules:
ifneq (,$(filter
Hi,
On Sun, Jan 16, 2011 at 11:09 AM, Julien Cristau jcris...@debian.org wrote:
How does that follow? These kinds of updates are sort of allowed for
sun-java6 because it's non-free so there's no choice. That does not
apply to openjdk, as far as I know.
I think that openjdk is not that
* Torsten Werner:
Hi,
On Sun, Jan 16, 2011 at 11:09 AM, Julien Cristau jcris...@debian.org wrote:
How does that follow? These kinds of updates are sort of allowed for
sun-java6 because it's non-free so there's no choice. That does not
apply to openjdk, as far as I know.
I think that
* Florian Weimer:
AFAICT, Debian is actually shipping IcedTea releases, but those are
re-rebranded as IcedTea.
Sorry, re-rebranded as OpenJDK.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
On Sun, Jan 16, 2011 at 12:25 PM, Florian Weimer f...@deneb.enyo.de wrote:
* Florian Weimer:
AFAICT, Debian is actually shipping IcedTea releases, but those are
re-rebranded as IcedTea.
Sorry, re-rebranded as OpenJDK.
Oracle occasionally releases source tarballs at
On 14.01.2011 20:46, Florian Weimer wrote:
* tony mancill:
As per Section 5.8.5 of the Developer's Reference, I'd like to get
confirmation from the Security Team that they are anticipating and
approve of the upload of the new source version. (My apologies if this
has already been covered; I
* tony mancill:
As per Section 5.8.5 of the Developer's Reference, I'd like to get
confirmation from the Security Team that they are anticipating and
approve of the upload of the new source version. (My apologies if this
has already been covered; I joined the thread already in progress.)
On Thu, 2010-12-23 at 01:13 +0100, Matthias Klose wrote:
On 17.12.2010 15:58, Adam D. Barratt wrote:
On Fri, December 17, 2010 14:16, tony mancill wrote:
I'm able to build the version from unstable fine (it took 530 minutes...
:) I want to make sure I understand what you mean by
On 23.12.2010 05:10, tony mancill wrote:
On 12/22/2010 04:13 PM, Matthias Klose wrote:
On 17.12.2010 15:58, Adam D. Barratt wrote:
On Fri, December 17, 2010 14:16, tony mancill wrote:
On 12/13/2010 03:22 PM, Matthias Klose wrote:
so please use the one from unstable, re-generate the control
On 12/22/2010 02:04 AM, Julien Cristau wrote:
On Tue, Dec 21, 2010 at 21:32:52 -0800, tony mancill wrote:
First, I am assuming that I should set the version number to be
6b18-1.8.3-2+lenny1 and upload to stable-security with urgency=high. Can you
confirm that this is the desired target?
On 22.12.2010 06:32, tony mancill wrote:
On 12/17/2010 06:24 AM, Matthias Klose wrote:
On 17.12.2010 15:16, tony mancill wrote:
On 12/13/2010 03:22 PM, Matthias Klose wrote:
On 14.12.2010 00:19, Adam D. Barratt wrote:
On Sun, 2010-08-08 at 17:21 +0200, Florian Weimer wrote:
* Matthias
On Tue, Dec 21, 2010 at 21:32:52 -0800, tony mancill wrote:
First, I am assuming that I should set the version number to be
6b18-1.8.3-2+lenny1 and upload to stable-security with urgency=high. Can you
confirm that this is the desired target?
No, the version number must be less than in
On 17.12.2010 15:58, Adam D. Barratt wrote:
On Fri, December 17, 2010 14:16, tony mancill wrote:
On 12/13/2010 03:22 PM, Matthias Klose wrote:
so please use the one from unstable, re-generate the control file on a
stable system, and re-upload.
Matthias
Hello Matthias -
I'm able to build
On 12/22/2010 04:13 PM, Matthias Klose wrote:
On 17.12.2010 15:58, Adam D. Barratt wrote:
On Fri, December 17, 2010 14:16, tony mancill wrote:
On 12/13/2010 03:22 PM, Matthias Klose wrote:
so please use the one from unstable, re-generate the control file on a
stable system, and re-upload.
On 12/17/2010 06:24 AM, Matthias Klose wrote:
On 17.12.2010 15:16, tony mancill wrote:
On 12/13/2010 03:22 PM, Matthias Klose wrote:
On 14.12.2010 00:19, Adam D. Barratt wrote:
On Sun, 2010-08-08 at 17:21 +0200, Florian Weimer wrote:
* Matthias Klose:
For those who are interested in an
On 12/13/2010 03:22 PM, Matthias Klose wrote:
On 14.12.2010 00:19, Adam D. Barratt wrote:
On Sun, 2010-08-08 at 17:21 +0200, Florian Weimer wrote:
* Matthias Klose:
For those who are interested in an openjdk-6 update for stable, I did
prepare an update for some architectures at
deb
On 17.12.2010 15:16, tony mancill wrote:
On 12/13/2010 03:22 PM, Matthias Klose wrote:
On 14.12.2010 00:19, Adam D. Barratt wrote:
On Sun, 2010-08-08 at 17:21 +0200, Florian Weimer wrote:
* Matthias Klose:
For those who are interested in an openjdk-6 update for stable, I did
prepare an
On Fri, December 17, 2010 14:16, tony mancill wrote:
On 12/13/2010 03:22 PM, Matthias Klose wrote:
so please use the one from unstable, re-generate the control file on a
stable system, and re-upload.
Matthias
Hello Matthias -
I'm able to build the version from unstable fine (it took 530
On Sun, 2010-08-08 at 17:21 +0200, Florian Weimer wrote:
* Matthias Klose:
For those who are interested in an openjdk-6 update for stable, I did
prepare an update for some architectures at
deb http://people.debian.org/~doko/archive stable/
Cool, it's based on OpenJDK 6b18. However,
On 14.12.2010 00:19, Adam D. Barratt wrote:
On Sun, 2010-08-08 at 17:21 +0200, Florian Weimer wrote:
* Matthias Klose:
For those who are interested in an openjdk-6 update for stable, I did
prepare an update for some architectures at
deb http://people.debian.org/~doko/archive stable/
* Philipp Kern:
Florian,
On 08/08/2010 11:21 AM, Florian Weimer wrote:
Cool, it's based on OpenJDK 6b18. However, we can't upload it as-is
because the version number is greater than the one in testing.
apart from the fact that this could of course be solved by an upload
to t-p-u in
Hi,
On Sun, Aug 15, 2010 at 9:57 AM, Florian Weimer f...@deneb.enyo.de wrote:
* Philipp Kern:
On 08/08/2010 11:21 AM, Florian Weimer wrote:
Cool, it's based on OpenJDK 6b18. However, we can't upload it as-is
because the version number is greater than the one in testing.
apart from the
Florian,
On 08/08/2010 11:21 AM, Florian Weimer wrote:
Cool, it's based on OpenJDK 6b18. However, we can't upload it as-is
because the version number is greater than the one in testing.
apart from the fact that this could of course be solved by an upload to
t-p-u in the worst case, it's
* Matthias Klose:
Or does everybody see openjdk as an alibi for Debian to build things
and then use the sun-java packages from non-free?
I know folks who use it in production, admittedly with compiler
excludes to work around some C2 bugs.
For those who are interested in an openjdk-6 update
Hi,
On Fri, Aug 6, 2010 at 4:16 AM, Tom Marble tmar...@info9.net wrote:
On 07/28/2010 06:44 PM, Matthias Klose wrote:
OpenJDK was just uploaded to unstable, based on the IcedTea6-1.8.1
release [1]. This version addresses some security issues,
and this version should be shipped with squeeze
A
On 07/28/2010 06:44 PM, Matthias Klose wrote:
OpenJDK was just uploaded to unstable, based on the IcedTea6-1.8.1
release [1]. This version addresses some security issues,
and this version should be shipped with squeeze
A group of Debian Java developers met tonight and agreed that
we would not
OpenJDK was just uploaded to unstable, based on the IcedTea6-1.8.1 release [1].
This version addresses some security issues, and this version should be shipped
with squeeze. The package should build on all architectures except on mips.
openjdk-6 on mips doesn't seem to be good enough to build
33 matches
Mail list logo
