tags 558784 + squeeze-ignore
thanks
On Fri, 2010-03-19 at 17:17 +0100, Michael Vogt wrote:
On a sidetrack it would be good to know if we should tag RC bug
#558784 [1] as squeeze-ignore and work together on the issue after the
squeeze release or if untagged immediately as you are also the
On Sun, Apr 25, 2010 at 05:33:15PM +0100, Adam D. Barratt wrote:
Hi,
Hi,
sorry for the delayed answer.
On Wed, 2010-04-14 at 17:53 +0200, David Kalnischkies wrote:
2010/3/19 Michael Vogt m...@debian.org:
bin-NMUs. The ABI break is required for following new features:
- allow multiple
Hi,
On Wed, 2010-04-14 at 17:53 +0200, David Kalnischkies wrote:
2010/3/19 Michael Vogt m...@debian.org:
bin-NMUs. The ABI break is required for following new features:
- allow multiple ddtp translation downloads
- allow Packages file without long descriptions [0]
- preparation of the
Hello (again) :)
$ ping release-team
2010/3/19 Michael Vogt m...@debian.org:
bin-NMUs. The ABI break is required for following new features:
- allow multiple ddtp translation downloads
- allow Packages file without long descriptions [0]
- preparation of the cache/data structures for
2010/3/20 Joerg Jaspert jo...@debian.org:
If you could add a mode that does not write them into a packages file
but into a seperate one, in the layout I described back then, that would
rock and save us a lot of time during each dinstall run!
So what you need is something like that?
2010/3/19 Joerg Jaspert jo...@debian.org:
On 12059 March 1977, Michael Vogt wrote:
Where can one see the changes that are in that release? The bzr
repository is either lying to me or its in another branch elsewhere or
ive completly forgot how bzr works or whatever. :)
bzr isn't completely
One feature I asked for in my mail about the long descriptions was
having apt-ftparchive split the existing long descriptions out into a
seperate file. Is that implemented?
apt-ftparchive doesn't split out currently, since apt 0.7.25 [1] however it
is possible to set
Hi,
the apt team plans to upload a new version of apt around 1. April that
unfortunately breaks the ABI. To make this as painless as possible we
would like to coordinate this with you so that we can schedule
bin-NMUs. The ABI break is required for following new features:
- allow multiple ddtp
On 12059 March 1977, Michael Vogt wrote:
the apt team plans to upload a new version of apt around 1. April that
unfortunately breaks the ABI. To make this as painless as possible we
would like to coordinate this with you so that we can schedule
bin-NMUs. The ABI break is required for
9 matches
Mail list logo
