Steve Langasek wrote:
Another transition that today is in an earlier stage is the
mozilla-xulrunner transition. I've asked on #debian-release what people
thought should be done if seamonkey isn't packaged in time for etch --
should mozilla and all its reverse-deps be dropped because it's not
Hi,
in private Steve and I discussed some release issues, and we both
agreed that (a) our output is public and (b) it should happen in
public, so here it is dragged into the public.
Steve wrote:
Broad categories of release-critical bugs that exist today:
- packages that FTBFS
- security
* Martin Schulze:
When there is no cups for amd64 in the release, it does not matter
whether it FTBFS on amd64 or not, for example.
I believe that such FTBFS bugs are already deemed important; they
are not release-critical. A lot of porters who file FTBFS bugs
disagree, but this doesn't make
On Wed, Aug 30, 2006 at 01:08:27PM +0200, Martin Schulze wrote:
Steve Langasek wrote:
On Wed, Aug 30, 2006 at 07:44:27AM +0200, Martin Schulze wrote:
These bugs are at least to be investigated and maybe resolved in a
rather pragmatic way:
- packages that FTBFS
. on which
Steve Langasek wrote:
Another transition that today is in an earlier stage is the
mozilla-xulrunner transition. I've asked on #debian-release what people
thought should be done if seamonkey isn't packaged in time for etch --
should mozilla and all its reverse-deps be dropped because it's not
5 matches
Mail list logo
