Problem with kernel on SATA hosts - RC?

2004-12-01 Thread Richard Atterer
Hello, I think there is a problem with kernel-image-2.6.8-1-686, but I'm not sure whether I messed up something... I installed sarge on a SATA host a while ago (Intel ICH, worked just fine!). Now I upgraded from the installer's kernel-image-2.6.8-1-386 to version 2.6.8-10 of the

Re: Problem with kernel on SATA hosts - RC?

2004-12-01 Thread Steve Langasek
On Wed, Dec 01, 2004 at 12:01:29PM +0100, Richard Atterer wrote: Obviously, you cannot load the SATA modules if you need the SATA code to access the hard disc. Of course you can, that's what initial ramdisks are for. -- Steve Langasek postmodern programmer signature.asc Description: Digital

Re: Problem with kernel on SATA hosts - RC?

2004-12-01 Thread Richard Atterer
On Wed, Dec 01, 2004 at 03:06:17AM -0800, Steve Langasek wrote: On Wed, Dec 01, 2004 at 12:01:29PM +0100, Richard Atterer wrote: Obviously, you cannot load the SATA modules if you need the SATA code to access the hard disc. Of course you can, that's what initial ramdisks are for.

Re: Problem with kernel on SATA hosts - RC?

2004-12-01 Thread Colin Watson
On Wed, Dec 01, 2004 at 03:27:56PM +0100, Richard Atterer wrote: On Wed, Dec 01, 2004 at 03:06:17AM -0800, Steve Langasek wrote: On Wed, Dec 01, 2004 at 12:01:29PM +0100, Richard Atterer wrote: Obviously, you cannot load the SATA modules if you need the SATA code to access the hard disc.

Re: Problem with kernel on SATA hosts - RC?

2004-12-01 Thread Goswin von Brederlow
Richard Atterer [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: Hello, I think there is a problem with kernel-image-2.6.8-1-686, but I'm not sure whether I messed up something... I installed sarge on a SATA host a while ago (Intel ICH, worked just fine!). Now I upgraded from the installer's

Re: Problem with kernel on SATA hosts - RC?

2004-12-01 Thread Richard Atterer
On Wed, Dec 01, 2004 at 06:37:52PM +0100, Goswin von Brederlow wrote: The problem is with near certainty that you updated from a sata-ide driver to a sata-scsi driver. The device names for your disk subsequently changed from /dev/hda to /dev/sda. No, I am positive that I have been using