Re: Processed: Re: Bug#262236: Acknowledgement (apsfilter: FTBFS: Please replace 'exim' with 'exim4' in Build-Depends)

2004-08-31 Thread Frank Lichtenheld
On Tue, Aug 31, 2004 at 04:10:02PM +0200, Andreas Jochens wrote: On 04-Aug-31 15:47, Frank Lichtenheld wrote: On Tue, Aug 31, 2004 at 06:33:04AM -0700, Debian Bug Tracking System wrote: severity 262236 serious Bug#262236: apsfilter: FTBFS: Please replace 'exim' with 'exim4' in

Re: Processed: Re: Bug#262236: Acknowledgement (apsfilter: FTBFS: Please replace 'exim' with 'exim4' in Build-Depends)

2004-08-31 Thread Colin Watson
severity 262236 normal thanks On Tue, Aug 31, 2004 at 04:17:00PM +0200, Frank Lichtenheld wrote: On Tue, Aug 31, 2004 at 04:10:02PM +0200, Andreas Jochens wrote: Maybe I am misinterpreting something, but in http://release.debian.org/sarge_rc_policy.txt it says: Release

Re: Processed: Re: Bug#262236: Acknowledgement (apsfilter: FTBFS: Please replace 'exim' with 'exim4' in Build-Depends)

2004-08-31 Thread Andreas Jochens
On 04-Aug-31 15:25, Colin Watson wrote: Normally, build daemons have a package that provides mail-transport-agent already installed; ssmtp is the usual choice. Andreas, I suggest you configure your build daemon this way. I don't think this is RC for sarge. Thank you for the clarification

Re: Processed: Re: Bug#262236: Acknowledgement (apsfilter: FTBFS: Please replace 'exim' with 'exim4' in Build-Depends)

2004-08-31 Thread Thomas Bushnell BSG
Andreas Jochens [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: What would be the correct bug severity for 'Arch: all' packages which do not autobuild because of missing or incorrect Build-Depends? My understanding is that these are release critical bugs according to the published release criteria, if they are