Re: Bug#598957: NMU of mdadm for squeeze-proposed-upates

2011-09-13 Thread Dominic Hargreaves
On Sat, Aug 27, 2011 at 02:55:50PM +0200, Philipp Kern wrote: On Mon, Jun 06, 2011 at 12:59:09PM +0100, Dominic Hargreaves wrote: +1 for this patch to be applied in stable. Apart from the inconvenience of being emailed by all your Debian systems using mdadm once a month, sending people an

Re: Bug#598957: NMU of mdadm for squeeze-proposed-upates

2011-09-13 Thread Michael Tokarev
On 13.09.2011 19:01, Dominic Hargreaves wrote: [] This is still unfixed in sid, though. Indeed so. In any case, since I have rolled this out on some servers I manage, I thought I may as well confirm that a patch (attached) adopted from

Re: Bug#598957: NMU of mdadm for squeeze-proposed-upates

2011-08-27 Thread Philipp Kern
On Mon, Jun 06, 2011 at 12:59:09PM +0100, Dominic Hargreaves wrote: +1 for this patch to be applied in stable. Apart from the inconvenience of being emailed by all your Debian systems using mdadm once a month, sending people an email about a normal situation is likely to mean that people miss

Re: Bug#598957: NMU of mdadm for squeeze-proposed-upates

2011-06-06 Thread Dominic Hargreaves
On Wed, May 04, 2011 at 02:36:08PM +0800, Thomas Goirand wrote: - Original message - also sprach Julien Cristau jcris...@debian.org [2011.05.03.2004 +0200]: I don't think that's worth a stable update on its own. It's apparently an inconvenience to our users, and fixable with