On Wed, Jan 04, 2006 at 03:36:00AM -0800, Steve Langasek wrote:
reopen 345868
thanks
On Wed, Jan 04, 2006 at 10:30:47AM +0100, Gerrit Pape wrote:
Unfortunately the discussion about the freecdb package didn't attract
my attention earlier, the release critical bug is resolved as invalid
On Thu, Jan 05, 2006 at 06:05:28PM +0100, Gerrit Pape wrote:
On Wed, Jan 04, 2006 at 03:36:00AM -0800, Steve Langasek wrote:
reopen 345868
thanks
On Wed, Jan 04, 2006 at 10:30:47AM +0100, Gerrit Pape wrote:
Unfortunately the discussion about the freecdb package didn't attract
my
On Tue, Jan 03, 2006 at 10:12:10PM -0800, Steve Langasek wrote:
On Tue, Jan 03, 2006 at 06:24:09PM -0500, Nathanael Nerode wrote:
I don't know how much we care about that...
cvm
mailfront
are in testing but Build-Depend on freecdb which isn't.
Well, that's a release-critical bug,
reopen 345868
thanks
On Wed, Jan 04, 2006 at 10:30:47AM +0100, Gerrit Pape wrote:
On Tue, Jan 03, 2006 at 10:12:10PM -0800, Steve Langasek wrote:
On Tue, Jan 03, 2006 at 06:24:09PM -0500, Nathanael Nerode wrote:
I don't know how much we care about that...
cvm
mailfront
are in
On Tue, Jan 03, 2006 at 06:24:09PM -0500, Nathanael Nerode wrote:
I don't know how much we care about that...
cvm
mailfront
are in testing but Build-Depend on freecdb which isn't.
Well, that's a release-critical bug, just of a class we don't spend much
time chasing until close to release.
5 matches
Mail list logo