Re: Build-depends on package not in testing

2006-01-05 Thread Gerrit Pape
On Wed, Jan 04, 2006 at 03:36:00AM -0800, Steve Langasek wrote: reopen 345868 thanks On Wed, Jan 04, 2006 at 10:30:47AM +0100, Gerrit Pape wrote: Unfortunately the discussion about the freecdb package didn't attract my attention earlier, the release critical bug is resolved as invalid

Re: Build-depends on package not in testing

2006-01-05 Thread Kurt Roeckx
On Thu, Jan 05, 2006 at 06:05:28PM +0100, Gerrit Pape wrote: On Wed, Jan 04, 2006 at 03:36:00AM -0800, Steve Langasek wrote: reopen 345868 thanks On Wed, Jan 04, 2006 at 10:30:47AM +0100, Gerrit Pape wrote: Unfortunately the discussion about the freecdb package didn't attract my

Re: Build-depends on package not in testing

2006-01-04 Thread Gerrit Pape
On Tue, Jan 03, 2006 at 10:12:10PM -0800, Steve Langasek wrote: On Tue, Jan 03, 2006 at 06:24:09PM -0500, Nathanael Nerode wrote: I don't know how much we care about that... cvm mailfront are in testing but Build-Depend on freecdb which isn't. Well, that's a release-critical bug,

Re: Build-depends on package not in testing

2006-01-04 Thread Steve Langasek
reopen 345868 thanks On Wed, Jan 04, 2006 at 10:30:47AM +0100, Gerrit Pape wrote: On Tue, Jan 03, 2006 at 10:12:10PM -0800, Steve Langasek wrote: On Tue, Jan 03, 2006 at 06:24:09PM -0500, Nathanael Nerode wrote: I don't know how much we care about that... cvm mailfront are in

Re: Build-depends on package not in testing

2006-01-03 Thread Steve Langasek
On Tue, Jan 03, 2006 at 06:24:09PM -0500, Nathanael Nerode wrote: I don't know how much we care about that... cvm mailfront are in testing but Build-Depend on freecdb which isn't. Well, that's a release-critical bug, just of a class we don't spend much time chasing until close to release.