(Joey, in the highly improbable case you would have missed this in -release)
Not only are they. They are OBSOLETE, and UNMAINTAINED upstream.
No need to shout, I think, especially at our release managers..:-)
Last summer, 2.6 wasn't working properly on hppa (much borkage) and the
only
Christian Perrier wrote:
Unfortunately, and as far as I can tell, there hasn't been much
activity and interaction with the d-i team about this. So, it turns
out that the 2.6/installer combination is very likely to be nearly
untested. Having hppa installs be really tested was already a
On Fri, Jan 14, 2005 at 02:47:01AM -0500, Joey Hess wrote:
Christian Perrier wrote:
I'm not even sure that hppa installs are really well tested, by the
way. Joey could tell more and this probably needs more input from him.
He may even correct me if I'm completely wrong.
So all I can say
*** PLEASE CC ME IN REPLIES ***
If the hppa 2.6 kernels were included in the last d-i release candidate
and there are successful install reports with that version, I think it's
reasonable to consider dropping 2.4 kernels if they're really this
difficult to support.
Not only are they. They
4 matches
Mail list logo
