Re: NMU of mdadm for squeeze-proposed-upates

2011-06-09 Thread Philipp Kern
On Tue, May 03, 2011 at 02:52:31PM +0800, Thomas Goirand wrote: I would like to upload a fix for #598957 in Squeeze. I'd tend to allow it if you show me a successful piuparts run in stable with the new version (or if I get around to do the same thing). And, more importantly, this needs to be

Re: NMU of mdadm for squeeze-proposed-upates

2011-06-06 Thread Stéphane Glondu
Le 03/05/2011 08:52, Thomas Goirand a écrit : -echo $PROGNAME: I: selecting $ionice I/O scheduling class for resync of $array. 2 +[ $quiet -lt 1 ] echo $PROGNAME: I: selecting $ionice I/O scheduling class for resync of $array. 2 Out of context, I would prefer something like: if [ $quiet

Re: NMU of mdadm for squeeze-proposed-upates

2011-05-04 Thread martin f krafft
also sprach Julien Cristau jcris...@debian.org [2011.05.03.2004 +0200]: I don't think that's worth a stable update on its own. It's apparently an inconvenience to our users, and fixable with a trivial patch. Are there arguments against it going into the next r-release? -- .''`. martin f.

Re: NMU of mdadm for squeeze-proposed-upates

2011-05-04 Thread Thomas Goirand
- Original message - also sprach Julien Cristau jcris...@debian.org [2011.05.03.2004 +0200]: I don't think that's worth a stable update on its own. It's apparently an inconvenience to our users, and fixable with a trivial patch. Are there arguments against it going into the next

Re: NMU of mdadm for squeeze-proposed-upates

2011-05-03 Thread Julien Cristau
On Tue, May 3, 2011 at 14:52:31 +0800, Thomas Goirand wrote: Hello to the release team! I would like to upload a fix for #598957 in Squeeze. http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=598957 It seems that there is a consensus for this fix: -echo $PROGNAME: I: selecting $ionice