Re: Tracking ghc transition on http://release.debian.org/transitions/

2011-04-10 Thread Mehdi Dogguy
On 03/29/2011 08:27 PM, Joachim Breitner wrote: Hi release team, the transitions monitors on http://release.debian.org/transitions/ look useful, and I guess it makes more sense to use an existing instance instead of setting up the software ourself on alioth. Would that be possible? Can you

Re: Tracking ghc transition on http://release.debian.org/transitions/

2011-04-10 Thread Joachim Breitner
Hi, Am Sonntag, den 10.04.2011, 19:49 +0200 schrieb Mehdi Dogguy: On 03/29/2011 08:27 PM, Joachim Breitner wrote: Hi release team, the transitions monitors on http://release.debian.org/transitions/ look useful, and I guess it makes more sense to use an existing instance instead of

Re: Tracking ghc transition on http://release.debian.org/transitions/

2011-03-31 Thread Julien Cristau
On Tue, Mar 29, 2011 at 23:57:19 +0530, Joachim Breitner wrote: Hi release team, the transitions monitors on http://release.debian.org/transitions/ look useful, and I guess it makes more sense to use an existing instance instead of setting up the software ourself on alioth. Would that be

Re: Tracking ghc transition on http://release.debian.org/transitions/

2011-03-31 Thread Joachim Breitner
Hi Julien, Am Donnerstag, den 31.03.2011, 16:06 +0200 schrieb Julien Cristau: On Tue, Mar 29, 2011 at 23:57:19 +0530, Joachim Breitner wrote: the transitions monitors on http://release.debian.org/transitions/ look useful, and I guess it makes more sense to use an existing instance instead

Re: Tracking ghc transition on http://release.debian.org/transitions/

2011-03-31 Thread Stéphane Glondu
Le 31/03/2011 20:35, Joachim Breitner a écrit : I’m surprised by the dependency level calculation – haskell-transformers should be on one level with -deepseq. But maybe that calculation is confused as the binary package names are changing during the transition. The code assumes (among other