Re: Would you be open to accepting DHCP 4.1.2 into Squeeze?

2010-11-18 Thread Moritz Muehlenhoff
In gmane.linux.debian.devel.release, you wrote: --PHCdUe6m4AxPMzOu Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Sun, Nov 14, 2010 at 02:46:20PM +0100, Julien Cristau wrote: A question about the SIGPIPE handling. Is

Re: Would you be open to accepting DHCP 4.1.2 into Squeeze?

2010-11-18 Thread Andrew Pollock
On Thu, Nov 18, 2010 at 09:48:01PM +0100, Moritz Muehlenhoff wrote: In gmane.linux.debian.devel.release, you wrote: --PHCdUe6m4AxPMzOu Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Sun, Nov 14, 2010 at

Re: Would you be open to accepting DHCP 4.1.2 into Squeeze?

2010-11-18 Thread Julien Cristau
On Fri, Nov 19, 2010 at 09:19:11 +1000, Andrew Pollock wrote: On Thu, Nov 18, 2010 at 09:48:01PM +0100, Moritz Muehlenhoff wrote: In gmane.linux.debian.devel.release, you wrote: On Sun, Nov 14, 2010 at 02:46:20PM +0100, Julien Cristau wrote: A question about the SIGPIPE handling. Is

Re: Would you be open to accepting DHCP 4.1.2 into Squeeze?

2010-11-18 Thread Andrew Pollock
On Fri, Nov 19, 2010 at 12:48:18AM +0100, Julien Cristau wrote: I fear things will start getting -EPIPE instead of being killed by SIGPIPE, which they won't expect. It'll probably be fine in most(all?) cases, but I don't know what kind of scripts people are running from dhclient, and I'd

Re: Would you be open to accepting DHCP 4.1.2 into Squeeze?

2010-11-14 Thread Julien Cristau
On Sun, Nov 14, 2010 at 11:36:41 +1000, Andrew Pollock wrote: Hi, ISC has just released DHCP 4.1.2, which fixes CERT: VU#102047 CVE: CVE-2010-3611 The full release notes are at http://ftp.isc.org/isc/dhcp/dhcp-4.1.2-RELNOTES The changes between 4.1.1-P1 and 4.1.2 look to be fairly

Re: Would you be open to accepting DHCP 4.1.2 into Squeeze?

2010-11-14 Thread Andrew Pollock
On Sun, Nov 14, 2010 at 02:46:20PM +0100, Julien Cristau wrote: A question about the SIGPIPE handling. Is the default handling restored before executing another program (e.g. dhclient scripts)? Not from my quick inspection of the source, but I'm confirming with upstream. I'll let you know