Hi,
On Saturday 27 September 2008 15:30, Julien BLACHE wrote:
If they could finally allow Sam Leffler to release his version of the
HAL, that'd be even better. I think it's the only HAL supporting the
AR5008 family.
FWIW, Felix's hal is based on Sams and therefore supports the same
On Saturday 27 September 2008 08:13:15 Julien BLACHE wrote:
Kel Modderman [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi,
* we must trust a binary HAL that was only announced to the public on the
16th of September 2008 by Scott Raynel, who announced it because Felix
couldn't really be bothered.
Kel Modderman [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi,
Yeah, and a lot of stuff is happening off the public lists too, which brought
me here to declare Madwifi unfit for a long term release, as I believe the
driver is on the brink of being abandoned upstream.
It's been more or less that way for at least
Kel Modderman [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi,
* we must trust a binary HAL that was only announced to the public on the
16th of September 2008 by Scott Raynel, who announced it because Felix
couldn't really be bothered.
For your information, Atheros have just released their HAL under the
On Wednesday 17 September 2008 22:21:38 Holger Levsen wrote:
Hi,
On Wednesday 17 September 2008 02:08, Kel Modderman wrote:
Why BCC him and not CC?
Because I think it would be impolite, esp. because usually people dont remove
cc:s when they are not useful anymore. I gave him the link
Hi!
Sorry to jump on the discussion so late, I only realised about the discusion
today when Kel pointed me to it after I had filled more info on bug #492251
because of the bad state current package is on.
I see two issues here:
- Maintainability of the packages we ship with (even this is not
Hi Felix,
On Thursday 18 September 2008 02:27:04 Felix Fietkau wrote:
Kel Modderman kel at otaku42.de writes:
the following facts are true (correct me if wrong):
* we must revert to a snapshot of madwifi.org trunk at svn revsion 3314,
madwifi.org trunk is at revision 3856, the package
Hi,
On Wednesday 17 September 2008 02:08, Kel Modderman wrote:
Why BCC him and not CC?
Because I think it would be impolite, esp. because usually people dont remove
cc:s when they are not useful anymore. I gave him the link to the web
archive, so he can easily followup.
This is annoying as
Hi Holger,
On Wednesday 17 September 2008 22:21:38 Holger Levsen wrote:
This is annoying as he does not see my responses. I
also do not think he holds any relevance to this discussion, I am sure he
could not give two hoots what decisions Debian is making, he is a very busy
person.
Kel Modderman kel at otaku42.de writes:
the following facts are true (correct me if wrong):
* we must revert to a snapshot of madwifi.org trunk at svn revsion 3314,
madwifi.org trunk is at revision 3856, the package in Lenny is based
on a branch of revision 3772. This means discarding a
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
I tend to agree with Kel here. Even as a eee user, if the current
package that is in the archive is known to be broken, and he, as the
main maintainer of the package wants to downgrade it, or remove it, I
don't see why not. Keeping it in the archive
Hi,
I wondered on IRC today if I should suggest to update the madwifi package to
the a new upstream version...
Luk then asked me to send something to the list, so here is something.
On August 29th 2008 a new hal was released (a hal is the binary blob which
controls low level functions on
Hi Holger,
On Wednesday 17 September 2008 08:23:56 Holger Levsen wrote:
snip
If the release team would allow this route, we'd need to discuss who will do
the work (Felix, it would be great if you could release a tarball ;-), but
that only makes sense, if you don't vote for the removal
Hi Kel,
(mostly) just commenting on two aspects here, bcc:ing Felix again, so he can
comment on the technical details.
On Wednesday 17 September 2008 00:45, Kel Modderman wrote:
If forced between maintaining an awful snapshot of dead end crap for the
lifetime of Lenny just because I am not
Hi Holger,
Why BCC him and not CC? This is annoying as he does not see my responses. I
also do not think he holds any relevance to this discussion, I am sure he
could not give two hoots what decisions Debian is making, he is a very busy
person.
On Wednesday 17 September 2008 09:54:32 Holger
15 matches
Mail list logo
