Re: Proposal to do regular jenkins updates via jessie-updates (Was: Re: Removing Jenkins from Jessie)

2015-04-09 Thread Holger Levsen
Hi, On Mittwoch, 8. April 2015, Niels Thykier wrote: * There are several jenkins-* packages that will (presumably) need to be updated as often as Jenkins itself. I wondered which packages were jenkins* and figured it out with the help from Adam: holger@coccia:~$ dak rm -Rn jenkins Will

Re: Proposal to do regular jenkins updates via jessie-updates (Was: Re: Removing Jenkins from Jessie)

2015-04-08 Thread Adam D. Barratt
On Wed, 2015-04-08 at 23:33 +0200, Niels Thykier wrote: On 2015-04-08 22:45, Miguel Landaeta wrote: On Wed, 08 Apr 2015 18:17:59 +0200, Niels Thykier escribió: [...] I had a chat with James Page and Emmanuel Bourg about Jenkins over IRC. We concluded that it was infeasible for Debian

Proposal to do regular jenkins updates via jessie-updates (Was: Re: Removing Jenkins from Jessie)

2015-04-08 Thread Niels Thykier
On 2015-04-08 22:45, Miguel Landaeta wrote: On Wed, 08 Apr 2015 18:17:59 +0200, Niels Thykier escribió: [...] I had a chat with James Page and Emmanuel Bourg about Jenkins over IRC. We concluded that it was infeasible for Debian to maintain Jenkins due to the lack of upstream commitment to

Removing Jenkins from Jessie

2015-04-08 Thread Niels Thykier
Hi, I had a chat with James Page and Emmanuel Bourg about Jenkins over IRC. We concluded that it was infeasible for Debian to maintain Jenkins due to the lack of upstream commitment to a LTS release-cycle of sufficient length to match the length of Jessie[1]. Accordingly, we agreed to remove

Re: Removing Jenkins from Jessie

2015-04-08 Thread Miguel Landaeta
On Wed, 08 Apr 2015 18:17:59 +0200, Niels Thykier escribió: [...] I had a chat with James Page and Emmanuel Bourg about Jenkins over IRC. We concluded that it was infeasible for Debian to maintain Jenkins due to the lack of upstream commitment to a LTS release-cycle of sufficient length to