Hi kibi,
On 17-09-2022 01:41, Cyril Brulebois wrote:
A few questions I can think of:
- Is that a good idea in the first place? I think so, sidestepping
temporary issues in unstable looks like a valid usecase?
AFAIK that *is* the most common use of tpu these days (getting things
into
Cyril Brulebois, le sam. 17 sept. 2022 02:21:27 +0200, a ecrit:
> Samuel Thibault (2022-09-17):
> > Cyril Brulebois, le sam. 17 sept. 2022 01:41:52 +0200, a ecrit:
> > >
> > > https://salsa.debian.org/installer-team/debian-installer/-/commit/23e4451d7132e3bac7bd589747a44a776ea69834
> > >
> >
Samuel Thibault (2022-09-17):
> Cyril Brulebois, le sam. 17 sept. 2022 01:41:52 +0200, a ecrit:
> >
> > https://salsa.debian.org/installer-team/debian-installer/-/commit/23e4451d7132e3bac7bd589747a44a776ea69834
> >
> > To get back on track with the release, I'm tempted to just revert that
> >
Hello,
Cyril Brulebois, le sam. 17 sept. 2022 01:41:52 +0200, a ecrit:
>
> https://salsa.debian.org/installer-team/debian-installer/-/commit/23e4451d7132e3bac7bd589747a44a776ea69834
>
> To get back on track with the release, I'm tempted to just revert that
> commit right away,
I have
Hi folks,
As you might know, the installer is prepared this way:
- debian-installer MMDD uploaded to unstable;
- a debian-installer-images tarball (one per arch) gets generated
during the build and gets unpacked into installer-/ directories
for unstable (scripts/debian/byhand-di in
5 matches
Mail list logo
