Hi,
Am Dienstag, den 25.08.2009, 23:51 +0300 schrieb Riku Voipio:
On Tue, Aug 25, 2009 at 10:35:04PM +0300, Kari Pahula wrote:
Please don't remove ghc6 on ia64 from unstable. ghc6 has a
Build-Depends on ghc6 and the current 6.8.2 on ia64 is sufficient for
building 6.12.
would dropping
On Fri, Sep 04, 2009 at 04:48:07PM +0200, Joachim Breitner wrote:
Hi,
Am Dienstag, den 25.08.2009, 23:51 +0300 schrieb Riku Voipio:
On Tue, Aug 25, 2009 at 10:35:04PM +0300, Kari Pahula wrote:
Please don't remove ghc6 on ia64 from unstable. ghc6 has a
Build-Depends on ghc6 and the
* Luk Claes:
The most important issues seems to be that ghc6 FTBFS on ia64 [1].
Is ia64 a registerized build (if this GHC-ism is still relevant)?
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Florian Weimer wrote:
* Luk Claes:
The most important issues seems to be that ghc6 FTBFS on ia64 [1].
Is ia64 a registerized build (if this GHC-ism is still relevant)?
You apparently did not include the footnote. Though if you want to ask
if it has a buildbot: unfortunately not.
Cheers
* Luk Claes:
Florian Weimer wrote:
* Luk Claes:
The most important issues seems to be that ghc6 FTBFS on ia64 [1].
Is ia64 a registerized build (if this GHC-ism is still relevant)?
You apparently did not include the footnote. Though if you want to ask
if it has a buildbot:
Hi,
Am Friday 28 August 2009 22:07:29 schrieb Florian Weimer:
* Luk Claes:
Florian Weimer wrote:
* Luk Claes:
The most important issues seems to be that ghc6 FTBFS on ia64 [1].
Is ia64 a registerized build (if this GHC-ism is still relevant)?
[..]
Sorry, I tried to make clear that
tags 539789 + fixed-upstream
thanks
On Mon, Aug 24, 2009 at 10:55:27AM +0300, Kari Pahula wrote:
I'll give a try to building a HEAD branch snapshot.
Good news, that version compiled ok. I'm ready to guess that 6.12 is
likely to work too, then. Its release is scheduled to happen well
before
On Tue, Aug 25, 2009 at 10:35:04PM +0300, Kari Pahula wrote:
Please don't remove ghc6 on ia64 from unstable. ghc6 has a
Build-Depends on ghc6 and the current 6.8.2 on ia64 is sufficient for
building 6.12.
would dropping ghc6/ia64 from testing be still acceptable? that
would potentially allow
On Sat, Aug 22, 2009 at 03:17:51PM +0200, Joachim Breitner wrote:
I gave it a shot on merulo, but I could not figure out what???s wrong.
Compiler stuff is hard...
You've got further along with debugging it than me.
@kaol: Is there anyone actively working on it?
None of the upstream
On Mon, Aug 24, 2009 at 10:55:27AM +0300, Kari Pahula wrote:
On Sat, Aug 22, 2009 at 03:17:51PM +0200, Joachim Breitner wrote:
I gave it a shot on merulo, but I could not figure out what???s wrong.
Compiler stuff is hard...
You've got further along with debugging it than me.
@kaol: Is
Hi,
Am Montag, den 24.08.2009, 10:55 +0300 schrieb Kari Pahula:
@kaol: Is there anyone actively working on it?
None of the upstream developers use ia64, so fixing this is likely to
be up to Debian. There's a chance that the upcoming 6.12 release
(scheduled for September-November) will fix
Hi
There seem to be many RC bugs regarding Haskell in unstable/testing,
mainly due to the ongoing transition. Can you please look into build
failures and other issues preventing the transition from happening?
The most important issues seems to be that ghc6 FTBFS on ia64 [1].
Cheers
Luk
[1]
Hi,
Am Samstag, den 22.08.2009, 13:45 +0200 schrieb Luk Claes:
There seem to be many RC bugs regarding Haskell in unstable/testing,
mainly due to the ongoing transition. Can you please look into build
failures and other issues preventing the transition from happening?
I regularly look at the
13 matches
Mail list logo
