[ M-F-T to -devel ]
On Thu, Apr 07, 2011 at 06:00:09PM +0200, Stefano Zacchiroli wrote:
Another thread, another thread summary! Here is a summary about where we
are on this discussion, at least as far as I can tell.
Lather, rinse, repeat.
snip
I would love if we can summarize the above part
On Thu, Apr 07, 2011 at 06:00:09PM +0200, Stefano Zacchiroli wrote:
[ Bcc:-ing release team ]
Why Bcc?!
[...]
I would love if we can summarize the above part by saying that we have
consensus on: 1) announcing at the beginning of a release cycle a target
freeze month, 2) refining it later on.
this.
Any reaction to this?
This seems like an invitation to get whatever statement to attack.
What are the reasons you want an updated statement? The media coverage
on the time based freezes does not seem wrong to me or am I missing
something?
Cheers
Luk
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release
statement.
What are the reasons you want an updated statement? The media
coverage on the time based freezes does not seem wrong to me or am
I missing something?
You mean apart from the media that missed the freeze part of the
regularity and think that Debian will be doing time-based
*releases
to formulate a new
press statement.
What are the reasons you want an updated statement? The media
coverage on the time based freezes does not seem wrong to me or am
I missing something?
You mean apart from the media that missed the freeze part of the
regularity and think that Debian
of their message was around time based freezes
and not so much about any particular date.
Hm, strange. I cannot recall the article(s) that made me write my
initial message. It definitely seemed like this announcement was
never seen or absorbed by anyone. Maybe the two were too close to
each other.
So http
of their message was around time based freezes
and not so much about any particular date.
Hm, strange. I cannot recall the article(s) that made me write my
initial message. It definitely seemed like this announcement was
never seen or absorbed by anyone. Maybe the two were too close to
each other
also sprach martin f krafft madd...@debian.org [2009.10.26.1054 +0100]:
As far as I can tell, the press release during DebConf9[0] is still
taken to be the official position of the Debian project, at least if
I scan the pertinent media sources.
Luk's e-mail updates have not overly embraced
Dear release team members,
As far as I can tell, the press release during DebConf9[0] is still
taken to be the official position of the Debian project, at least if
I scan the pertinent media sources.
Luk's e-mail updates have not overly embraced the original proposal,
but the media does not read
9 matches
Mail list logo
