Bug#1036957: unblock: openssl/3.0.9-1

Hi, Paul Gevers (2023-05-31): > Can you have a look at this onblock request? It's blocked on your > block-udeb. Sorry for the delay; finally run some checks combining openssl and libselinux binaries, everything looks good. unblock-udeb in place, leaving monitoring and closing up to you.

Processed: Re: Bug#1036957: unblock: openssl/3.0.8-1

Processing control commands: > tags -1 d-i Bug #1036957 [release.debian.org] unblock: openssl/3.0.9-1 Added tag(s) d-i. -- 1036957: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1036957 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems

Bug#1036957: unblock: openssl/3.0.8-1

Control: tags -1 d-i Hi kibi, Can you have a look at this onblock request? It's blocked on your block-udeb. Paul On 30-05-2023 22:52, Sebastian Andrzej Siewior wrote: control: retitle -1 unblock: openssl/3.0.9-1 On 2023-05-30 22:16:53 [+0200], To sub...@bugs.debian.org wrote: Please

Processed: Re: unblock: openssl/3.0.8-1

Processing control commands: > retitle -1 unblock: openssl/3.0.9-1 Bug #1036957 [release.debian.org] unblock: openssl/3.0.8-1 Changed Bug title to 'unblock: openssl/3.0.9-1' from 'unblock: openssl/3.0.8-1'. -- 1036957: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1036957 Debian

Bug#1036957: unblock: openssl/3.0.8-1

control: retitle -1 unblock: openssl/3.0.9-1 On 2023-05-30 22:16:53 [+0200], To sub...@bugs.debian.org wrote: > > Please unblock package openssl. > > The 3.0.9 release contains security and non-security related fixes for > the package. There are five new CVEs in total that has

Processed: unblock: openssl/3.0.8-1

Processing control commands: > affects -1 + src:openssl Bug #1036957 [release.debian.org] unblock: openssl/3.0.8-1 Added indication that 1036957 affects src:openssl -- 1036957: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1036957 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.

Bug#930194: marked as done (unblock: openssl/1.1.1c-1)

Your message dated Sat, 15 Jun 2019 10:20:48 +0200 with message-id <4faa6749-5eda-516d-e906-7e7de9129...@debian.org> and subject line Re: Bug#930194: unblock: openssl/1.1.1c-1 has caused the Debian Bug report #930194, regarding unblock: openssl/1.1.1c-1 to be marked as done. This means th

Processed: Re: Bug#930194: unblock: openssl/1.1.1c-1

Processing control commands: > tags -1 d-i Bug #930194 [release.debian.org] unblock: openssl/1.1.1c-1 Added tag(s) d-i. -- 930194: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=930194 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems

Bug#930194: unblock: openssl/1.1.1c-1

Control: tags -1 d-i Hi Sebastian, On 08-06-2019 21:39, Paul Gevers wrote: > Control: tags -1 moreinfo confirmed > > On 08-06-2019 10:50, Sebastian Andrzej Siewior wrote: >>> Even if we were to unblock, can we get the m2crypto fix available, such >>> that they can migrate together? I understood

Bug#930194: unblock: openssl/1.1.1c-1

Control: tags -1 moreinfo confirmed On 08-06-2019 10:50, Sebastian Andrzej Siewior wrote: >> Even if we were to unblock, can we get the m2crypto fix available, such >> that they can migrate together? I understood (last time I checked that >> bug) that this may just be a test fix? > > I believe

Processed: Re: Bug#930194: unblock: openssl/1.1.1c-1

Processing control commands: > tags -1 moreinfo confirmed Bug #930194 [release.debian.org] unblock: openssl/1.1.1c-1 Added tag(s) confirmed and moreinfo. -- 930194: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=930194 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems

Bug#930194: unblock: openssl/1.1.1c-1

On 2019-06-08 10:22:54 [+0200], Paul Gevers wrote: > Control: tags -1 moreinfo > > Hi Sebastian, Hi Paul, > Can you please elaborate why this version meets the freeze policy, or > why it should get an exception? In the text above there is no mention at > all of serious bugs that get fixed.

Processed: Re: Bug#930194: unblock: openssl/1.1.1c-1

Processing control commands: > tags -1 moreinfo Bug #930194 [release.debian.org] unblock: openssl/1.1.1c-1 Added tag(s) moreinfo. -- 930194: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=930194 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems

Bug#930194: unblock: openssl/1.1.1c-1

cherry-pick the patch right away. > > unblock openssl/1.1.1c-1 Can you please elaborate why this version meets the freeze policy, or why it should get an exception? In the text above there is no mention at all of serious bugs that get fixed. openssl is a rather important package and we

Bug#930194: unblock: openssl/1.1.1c-1

. unblock openssl/1.1.1c-1 Sebastian

Bug#927437: marked as done (unblock: openssl/1.1.1b-2)

Your message dated Sat, 20 Apr 2019 06:16:00 + with message-id and subject line Re: Bug#927437: unblock: openssl/1.1.1b-2 has caused the Debian Bug report #927437, regarding unblock: openssl/1.1.1b-2 to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt

Bug#927437: unblock: openssl/1.1.1b-2

Hi Kurt, Kurt Roeckx (2019-04-19): > Can you please unblock openssl. It fixes 2 important bugs. > debdiff attached. (And thanks for the cc.) I have been able to confirm during my work on haveged (#923675) that your upload indeed fixes the wget issues we had in d-i (#926315); so thank

Bug#927437: unblock: openssl/1.1.1b-2

Package: release.debian.org User: release.debian@packages.debian.org Usertags: unblock Hi, Can you please unblock openssl. It fixes 2 important bugs. debdiff attached. Kurt diff -Nru openssl-1.1.1b/debian/changelog openssl-1.1.1b/debian/changelog --- openssl-1.1.1b/debian/changelog

Bug#863472: marked as done (unblock: openssl/1.1.0f-1)

Your message dated Mon, 05 Jun 2017 11:40:00 + with message-id <fd888d14-c92a-9eb7-e061-8fd3eac8f...@thykier.net> and subject line Re: Bug#863472: unblock: openssl/1.1.0f-1 has caused the Debian Bug report #863472, regarding unblock: openssl/1.1.0f-1 to be marked as done. This means th

Bug#863472: unblock: openssl/1.1.0f-1

Kurt Roeckx (2017-06-05): > On Mon, Jun 05, 2017 at 11:33:57AM +0200, Cyril Brulebois wrote: > > Kurt Roeckx (2017-06-04): > > > So I've uploaded openssl 1.1.0f-2 > > > > Source debdiff lgtm from -1, and installation over https works fine, > > ACK. > > So I

Bug#863472: unblock: openssl/1.1.0f-1

Kurt Roeckx (2017-06-05): > On Mon, Jun 05, 2017 at 11:33:57AM +0200, Cyril Brulebois wrote: > > Kurt Roeckx (2017-06-04): > > > So I've uploaded openssl 1.1.0f-2 > > > > Source debdiff lgtm from -1, and installation over https works fine, > > ACK. > > So I

Bug#863472: unblock: openssl/1.1.0f-1

On Mon, Jun 05, 2017 at 11:33:57AM +0200, Cyril Brulebois wrote: > Kurt Roeckx (2017-06-04): > > So I've uploaded openssl 1.1.0f-2 > > Source debdiff lgtm from -1, and installation over https works fine, > ACK. So I actually have a new version I want to upload: Modified:

Bug#863472: unblock: openssl/1.1.0f-1

Kurt Roeckx (2017-06-04): > So I've uploaded openssl 1.1.0f-2 Source debdiff lgtm from -1, and installation over https works fine, ACK. > and openssl1.0 1.0.2l-2 Bare metal check with WPA is next on my todo list. KiBi. signature.asc Description: Digital signature

Bug#863472: unblock: openssl/1.1.0f-1

On Sun, Jun 04, 2017 at 06:53:29PM +0200, Cyril Brulebois wrote: > Kurt Roeckx (2017-06-04): > > So I changed it this instead: > > dh_makeshlibs -a -V --add-udeb="libcrypto1.1-udeb" -Xengines > > > > the shlib files now looks like: > > libcrypto 1.1 libssl1.1 (>= 1.1.0f) > >

Bug#863472: unblock: openssl/1.1.0f-1

Kurt Roeckx (2017-06-04): > So I changed it this instead: > dh_makeshlibs -a -V --add-udeb="libcrypto1.1-udeb" -Xengines > > the shlib files now looks like: > libcrypto 1.1 libssl1.1 (>= 1.1.0f) > libssl 1.1 libssl1.1 (>= 1.1.0f) > udeb: libcrypto 1.1 libcrypto1.1-udeb (>=

Bug#863472: unblock: openssl/1.1.0f-1

On Sun, Jun 04, 2017 at 11:09:00AM +, Niels Thykier wrote: > Kurt Roeckx: > > [...] > >> > >> Maybe file this as an RC bug against openssl so that it isn't forgotten > >> about, but ignore it for r0? > > > > So I have prepared an update. Should I upload it? > > > > [...] > > > > > > Kurt >

Bug#863472: unblock: openssl/1.1.0f-1

Kurt Roeckx: > [...] >> >> Maybe file this as an RC bug against openssl so that it isn't forgotten >> about, but ignore it for r0? > > So I have prepared an update. Should I upload it? > > [...] > > > Kurt > Ack from here, so if KiBi is ok with it, then please go ahead. Thanks, ~Niels

Bug#863472: unblock: openssl/1.1.0f-1

On Sun, Jun 04, 2017 at 05:29:21AM +0200, Cyril Brulebois wrote: > Niels Thykier (2017-06-03): > > Kurt Roeckx: > > > Package: release.debian.org > > > User: release.debian@packages.debian.org > > > Usertags: unblock > > > Severity: normal > > > > > > Hi, > > > > > > I've

Bug#863472: unblock: openssl/1.1.0f-1

Niels Thykier (2017-06-03): > Kurt Roeckx: > > Package: release.debian.org > > User: release.debian@packages.debian.org > > Usertags: unblock > > Severity: normal > > > > Hi, > > > > I've uploaded a new upstream version of openssl that contains bug > > fixes. The Debian

Bug#863472: unblock: openssl/1.1.0f-1

Kurt Roeckx: > Package: release.debian.org > User: release.debian@packages.debian.org > Usertags: unblock > Severity: normal > > Hi, > > I've uploaded a new upstream version of openssl that contains bug > fixes. The Debian changelog says: >* New upstream version > - Fix regression

Bug#863472: unblock: openssl/1.1.0f-1

Package: release.debian.org User: release.debian@packages.debian.org Usertags: unblock Severity: normal Hi, I've uploaded a new upstream version of openssl that contains bug fixes. The Debian changelog says: * New upstream version - Fix regression in req -x509 (Closes: #839575)

Bug#861686: marked as done (unblock: openssl/1.1.0e-2)

Your message dated Sat, 20 May 2017 05:54:00 + with message-id <b254c1b9-8e9a-4c80-048d-189bf2e63...@thykier.net> and subject line Re: Bug#861686: unblock: openssl/1.1.0e-2 has caused the Debian Bug report #861686, regarding unblock: openssl/1.1.0e-2 to be marked as done. This means th

Bug#861686: unblock: openssl/1.1.0e-2

Sebastian Andrzej Siewior (2017-05-18): > On 2017-05-07 16:39:00 [+], Niels Thykier wrote: > > Sebastian Andrzej Siewior: > > > uploaded and built on all releases architectures. > > > > Ack/RT unblock, CC'ing KiBi for a d-i ack. > > I don't want to rush or anything

Bug#861686: unblock: openssl/1.1.0e-2

On 2017-05-07 16:39:00 [+], Niels Thykier wrote: > Sebastian Andrzej Siewior: > > uploaded and built on all releases architectures. > > Ack/RT unblock, CC'ing KiBi for a d-i ack. I don't want to rush or anything but in case it got forgotten, we are still waiting for the d-i ack. > Thanks, >

Bug#861686: unblock: openssl/1.1.0e-2

Sebastian Andrzej Siewior: > Control: tag -1 - moreinfo > > On 2017-05-02 20:24:19 [+0100], Jonathan Wiltshire wrote: >> >> Yes, please go ahead and remove the moreinfo tag when it is ready to >> unblock. > > uploaded and built on all releases architectures. > > Sebastian > Ack/RT unblock,

Bug#861686: unblock: openssl/1.1.0e-2

Control: tag -1 - moreinfo On 2017-05-02 20:24:19 [+0100], Jonathan Wiltshire wrote: > > Yes, please go ahead and remove the moreinfo tag when it is ready to > unblock. uploaded and built on all releases architectures. Sebastian

Processed: Re: Bug#861686: unblock: openssl/1.1.0e-2

Processing control commands: > tag -1 - moreinfo Bug #861686 [release.debian.org] unblock: openssl/1.1.0e-2 Removed tag(s) moreinfo. -- 861686: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=861686 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems

Processed: Re: Bug#861686: unblock: openssl/1.1.0e-2

Processing control commands: > tag -1 confirmed moreinfo Bug #861686 [release.debian.org] unblock: openssl/1.1.0e-2 Added tag(s) moreinfo and confirmed. -- 861686: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=861686 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems

Bug#861686: unblock: openssl/1.1.0e-2

Control: tag -1 confirmed moreinfo On Tue, May 02, 2017 at 08:08:15PM +0200, Sebastian Andrzej Siewior wrote: > I prepared an update to the openssl about which I seek your guidance > whether it is approriate for Stretch or not. Yes, please go ahead and remove the moreinfo tag when it is ready to

Bug#861686: unblock: openssl/1.1.0e-2

mething we never had and it is misc because upstream puts it there. We don't want to add this dependency to the packet (especially at this point in the cycle). For post-Stretch we will decide how we handle it. unblock openssl/1.1.0e-2 Sebastian diff -Nru openssl-1.1.0e/debian/changelog openssl-1.1

Bug#855432: unblock: openssl/1.1.0e-1

Cyril Brulebois (2017-02-21): > I think that should work, yes. Please let me know when that's happened, > and I'll do the testing as soon as possible. This has happened, and building a netboot-gtk image with stretch udebs and with p-u enabled got me a 1.18-4.1 version of the

Bug#855432: unblock: openssl/1.1.0e-1

Niels Thykier (2017-02-20): > I did and I agree on the testing part. Would a "no-change rebuild" tpu > upload of wget be a solution for you? That should ensure we control > when the wget change migrates to testing (which is somewhat more > difficult with binNMUs). I think

Bug#855432: unblock: openssl/1.1.0e-1

Cyril Brulebois: > Niels Thykier (2017-02-19): >> [...] > > Hrm. You mentioned on IRC you were pondering possibly rebuilding wget > against 1.1 for stretch; if that happens, this needs d-i testing… > > > KiBi. > I did and I agree on the testing part. Would a "no-change

Bug#855432: unblock: openssl/1.1.0e-1

Niels Thykier (2017-02-19): > Cyril Brulebois: > > We have this right now: > > > > wget-udeb | 1.18-4| testing → built against 1.0.2 > > wget-udeb | 1.19.1-1 | unstable → built against 1.1 > > > > If we're not getting a newer wget for stretch (at least

Bug#855432: marked as done (unblock: openssl/1.1.0e-1)

Your message dated Sun, 19 Feb 2017 20:32:00 + with message-id <b4cb3278-1d8b-732a-83b4-c68bb9a6b...@thykier.net> and subject line Re: Bug#855432: unblock: openssl/1.1.0e-1 has caused the Debian Bug report #855432, regarding unblock: openssl/1.1.0e-1 to be marked as done. This means th

Bug#855432: unblock: openssl/1.1.0e-1

On Sun, Feb 19, 2017 at 07:33:20AM +0100, Cyril Brulebois wrote: > Kurt Roeckx (2017-02-18): > > On Sat, Feb 18, 2017 at 06:16:28PM +0100, Cyril Brulebois wrote: > > > How soon do you want to see this package in testing? Given I've just > > > fixed a few things related to https

Bug#855432: unblock: openssl/1.1.0e-1

Kurt Roeckx (2017-02-18): > On Sat, Feb 18, 2017 at 06:16:28PM +0100, Cyril Brulebois wrote: > > How soon do you want to see this package in testing? Given I've just > > fixed a few things related to https support in d-i, it would be nice if > > I were able to perform a full test

Bug#855432: unblock: openssl/1.1.0e-1

On Sat, Feb 18, 2017 at 06:16:28PM +0100, Cyril Brulebois wrote: > Hi, > > Niels Thykier (2017-02-18): > > Kurt Roeckx: > > > Package: release.debian.org > > > User: release.debian@packages.debian.org > > > Usertags: unblock > > > Severity: normal > > > > > > Hi, > > > >

Bug#855432: unblock: openssl/1.1.0e-1

Hi, Niels Thykier (2017-02-18): > Kurt Roeckx: > > Package: release.debian.org > > User: release.debian@packages.debian.org > > Usertags: unblock > > Severity: normal > > > > Hi, > > > > There was a new upstream release fixing a high severity security > > issue. > > > >

Bug#855432: unblock: openssl/1.1.0e-1

Kurt Roeckx: > Package: release.debian.org > User: release.debian@packages.debian.org > Usertags: unblock > Severity: normal > > Hi, > > There was a new upstream release fixing a high severity security > issue. > > The changelog entry is: > openssl (1.1.0e-1) unstable; urgency=high > > *

Bug#855432: unblock: openssl/1.1.0e-1

Package: release.debian.org User: release.debian@packages.debian.org Usertags: unblock Severity: normal Hi, There was a new upstream release fixing a high severity security issue. The changelog entry is: openssl (1.1.0e-1) unstable; urgency=high * New upstream version - Fixes

Bug#854155: unblock: openssl/1.1.0d-2

s. The d-2 >>> version fixes a regression discovered by perl and FTBFS of openssl >>> itself if arch-any and arch-all were built in one go. >>> >>> unblock openssl/1.1.0d-2 >> >> That includes some changes we don't like during the freeze, but given th

Bug#854155: unblock: openssl/1.1.0d-2

> > itself if arch-any and arch-all were built in one go. > > > > unblock openssl/1.1.0d-2 > > That includes some changes we don't like during the freeze, but given those > were > done before the freeze and I wouldn't want them reverted this early in the > freeze,

Bug#854155: unblock: openssl/1.1.0d-2

to the new release of the d version which fixes 3 CVE bugs. The > > d-2 version fixes a regression discovered by perl and FTBFS of > > openssl itself if arch-any and arch-all were built in one go. > > > > unblock openssl/1.1.0d-2 > > That includes some changes we don't l

Bug#854155: unblock: openssl/1.1.0d-2

ted changes which did not migrate in time due > to the new release of the d version which fixes 3 CVE bugs. The d-2 > version fixes a regression discovered by perl and FTBFS of openssl > itself if arch-any and arch-all were built in one go. > > unblock openssl/1.1.0d-2 That includ

Bug#780902: marked as done (unblock: openssl/1.0.1k-2)

Your message dated Mon, 30 Mar 2015 07:48:08 +0100 with message-id 891b44149957154b87faf0c8581a4...@mowgli.jungle.funky-badger.org and subject line Re: Bug#780902: unblock: openssl/1.0.1k-2 has caused the Debian Bug report #780902, regarding unblock: openssl/1.0.1k-2 to be marked as done

Bug#780902: unblock: openssl/1.0.1k-2

Control: tag -1 confirmed Adam D. Barratt a...@adam-barratt.org.uk (2015-03-21): On Sat, 2015-03-21 at 10:40 +0100, Kurt Roeckx wrote: 1.0.1k-2 contains security fixes. Could you please unblock it? Unblocked but needs a d-i ack as usual. No objections, thanks. Mraw, KiBi. signature.asc

Processed: Re: Bug#780902: unblock: openssl/1.0.1k-2

Processing control commands: tag -1 confirmed Bug #780902 [release.debian.org] unblock: openssl/1.0.1k-2 Added tag(s) confirmed. -- 780902: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=780902 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email

Bug#780902: unblock: openssl/1.0.1k-2

On Tue, 2015-03-24 at 21:48 +0100, Kurt Roeckx wrote: On Sat, Mar 21, 2015 at 07:51:32PM +, Adam D. Barratt wrote: Control: tags -1 + d-i On Sat, 2015-03-21 at 10:40 +0100, Kurt Roeckx wrote: 1.0.1k-2 contains security fixes. Could you please unblock it? Unblocked but needs a

Bug#780902: unblock: openssl/1.0.1k-2

On Sat, Mar 21, 2015 at 07:51:32PM +, Adam D. Barratt wrote: Control: tags -1 + d-i On Sat, 2015-03-21 at 10:40 +0100, Kurt Roeckx wrote: 1.0.1k-2 contains security fixes. Could you please unblock it? Unblocked but needs a d-i ack as usual. I've just make an upload of 1.0.1k-3 that

Bug#780902: unblock: openssl/1.0.1k-2

Adam D. Barratt a...@adam-barratt.org.uk (2015-03-21): Control: tags -1 + d-i On Sat, 2015-03-21 at 10:40 +0100, Kurt Roeckx wrote: 1.0.1k-2 contains security fixes. Could you please unblock it? Unblocked but needs a d-i ack as usual. Please hold on until after rc2 is out (due this

Bug#780902: unblock: openssl/1.0.1k-2

Package: release.debian.org Severity: normal User: release.debian@packages.debian.org Usertags: unblock Hi, 1.0.1k-2 contains security fixes. Could you please unblock it? Kurt -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble?

Processed: Re: Bug#780902: unblock: openssl/1.0.1k-2

Processing control commands: tags -1 + d-i Bug #780902 [release.debian.org] unblock: openssl/1.0.1k-2 Added tag(s) d-i. -- 780902: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=780902 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian

Bug#780902: unblock: openssl/1.0.1k-2

Control: tags -1 + d-i On Sat, 2015-03-21 at 10:40 +0100, Kurt Roeckx wrote: 1.0.1k-2 contains security fixes. Could you please unblock it? Unblocked but needs a d-i ack as usual. Regards, Adam -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of

Bug#775025: unblock: openssl/1.0.1k-1

Control: tag -1 confirmed Kurt Roeckx k...@roeckx.be (2015-01-20): Can you ACK that, or is there someone else in the d-i team that can do that? Not at the time this unblock was requested or pinged, but right now: yes. Mraw, KiBi. signature.asc Description: Digital signature

Processed: Re: Bug#775025: unblock: openssl/1.0.1k-1

Processing control commands: tag -1 confirmed Bug #775025 [release.debian.org] unblock: openssl/1.0.1k-1 Added tag(s) confirmed. -- 775025: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=775025 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email

Bug#775025: marked as done (unblock: openssl/1.0.1k-1)

Your message dated Sun, 25 Jan 2015 22:47:48 +0100 with message-id 54c56484.7060...@thykier.net and subject line Re: Bug#775025: unblock: openssl/1.0.1k-1 has caused the Debian Bug report #775025, regarding unblock: openssl/1.0.1k-1 to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem

Bug#775025: unblock: openssl/1.0.1k-1

Hi, Can you ACK that, or is there someone else in the d-i team that can do that? Kurt On Wed, Jan 14, 2015 at 05:52:58PM +0100, Niels Thykier wrote: Control: tags -1 d-i On 2015-01-10 12:01, Kurt Roeckx wrote: Package: release.debian.org Severity: normal User:

Processed: Re: Bug#775025: unblock: openssl/1.0.1k-1

Processing control commands: tags -1 d-i Bug #775025 [release.debian.org] unblock: openssl/1.0.1k-1 Added tag(s) d-i. -- 775025: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=775025 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian

Bug#775025: unblock: openssl/1.0.1k-1

Control: tags -1 d-i On 2015-01-10 12:01, Kurt Roeckx wrote: Package: release.debian.org Severity: normal User: release.debian@packages.debian.org Usertags: unblock Hi, I've uploaded a new upstream version of openssl to unstable. This contains fixes for 7 security issues affecting

Bug#775025: unblock: openssl/1.0.1k-1

On Sat, Jan 10, 2015 at 12:01:33PM +0100, Kurt Roeckx wrote: Package: release.debian.org Severity: normal User: release.debian@packages.debian.org Usertags: unblock Hi, I've uploaded a new upstream version of openssl to unstable. This contains fixes for 7 security issues affecting

Bug#775025: unblock: openssl/1.0.1k-1

Kurt, On Tue, Jan 13, 2015 at 23:22:08 +0100, Kurt Roeckx wrote: On Sat, Jan 10, 2015 at 12:01:33PM +0100, Kurt Roeckx wrote: Package: release.debian.org Severity: normal User: release.debian@packages.debian.org Usertags: unblock Hi, I've uploaded a new upstream version of

Bug#775025: unblock: openssl/1.0.1k-1

On Wed, Jan 14, 2015 at 12:00:52AM +0100, Julien Cristau wrote: Kurt, On Tue, Jan 13, 2015 at 23:22:08 +0100, Kurt Roeckx wrote: On Sat, Jan 10, 2015 at 12:01:33PM +0100, Kurt Roeckx wrote: Package: release.debian.org Severity: normal User: release.debian@packages.debian.org

Bug#775025: unblock: openssl/1.0.1k-1

Package: release.debian.org Severity: normal User: release.debian@packages.debian.org Usertags: unblock Hi, I've uploaded a new upstream version of openssl to unstable. This contains fixes for 7 security issues affecting jessie. It also contains a lot of other bug fixes. Can you please

Bug#703362: unblock: openssl/1.0.1e-2

Adam D. Barratt a...@adam-barratt.org.uk (19/03/2013): Unblocked, but needs a udeb ack. Looks good to me. Mraw, KiBi. signature.asc Description: Digital signature

Bug#703362: marked as done (unblock: openssl/1.0.1e-2)

Your message dated Fri, 22 Mar 2013 09:04:20 + with message-id 0d4c26f1672bc13c29503d37099cc...@mail.adsl.funky-badger.org and subject line Re: Bug#703362: unblock: openssl/1.0.1e-2 has caused the Debian Bug report #703362, regarding unblock: openssl/1.0.1e-2 to be marked as done. This means

Bug#703362: unblock: openssl/1.0.1e-2

Control: tags -1 + confirmed d-i On 18.03.2013 19:58, Kurt Roeckx wrote: Please unblock openssl/1.0.1e-2, it fixes a bunch of issues fixed in upstream git since the 1.0.1e release. Unblocked, but needs a udeb ack. Regards, Adam -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ

Processed: Re: Bug#703362: unblock: openssl/1.0.1e-2

Processing control commands: tags -1 + confirmed d-i Bug #703362 [release.debian.org] unblock: openssl/1.0.1e-2 Added tag(s) d-i and confirmed. -- 703362: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=703362 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems

Bug#703362: unblock: openssl/1.0.1e-2

Package: release.debian.org Severity: normal User: release.debian@packages.debian.org Usertags: unblock Please unblock openssl/1.0.1e-2, it fixes a bunch of issues fixed in upstream git since the 1.0.1e release. debdiff attached. Kurt diff -Nru openssl-1.0.1e/debian/changelog openssl

Bug#700441: marked as done (unblock openssl/1.0.1e-1)

Your message dated Sun, 24 Feb 2013 23:10:15 + with message-id 1361747415.20752.67.ca...@jacala.jungle.funky-badger.org and subject line Re: Bug#700441: unblock openssl/1.0.1e-1 has caused the Debian Bug report #700441, regarding unblock openssl/1.0.1e-1 to be marked as done. This means

Bug#700441: unblock openssl/1.0.1e-1

Package: release.debian.org Severity: normal User: release.debian@packages.debian.org Usertags: unblock Hi, Could you please unblock openssl 1.0.1e-1? It's a new upstream version that that fixes 3 security issues. The patches for the security issues itself is rather large. It also

Bug#683317: marked as done (unblock: openssl/1.0.1c-4)

Your message dated Sun, 12 Aug 2012 22:37:24 +0100 with message-id 1344807444.2978.96.ca...@jacala.jungle.funky-badger.org and subject line Re: Bug#683317: unblock: openssl/1.0.1c-4 has caused the Debian Bug report #683317, regarding unblock: openssl/1.0.1c-4 to be marked as done. This means

Bug#683317: unblock: openssl/1.0.1c-4

On Mon, Jul 30, 2012 at 08:46:13PM +0200, Kurt Roeckx wrote: Package: release.debian.org Severity: normal User: release.debian@packages.debian.org Usertags: unblock Please unblock openssl/1.0.1c-4 Here is the debdiff between the versions: diff -Nru openssl-1.0.1c/debian/changelog

Unblock openssl 0.9.8o-3

Hi, Could openssl 0.9.8o-3 please be unblocked? It contains a security fix. Kurt -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/20101117172722.ga24...@roeckx.be

Re: Unblock openssl 0.9.8o-3

On Wed, 2010-11-17 at 18:27 +0100, Kurt Roeckx wrote: Could openssl 0.9.8o-3 please be unblocked? It contains a security fix. Unblocked. Regards, Adam -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact

Re: Unblock openssl

Kurt Roeckx wrote: Hi, Can openssl 0.9.8g-16 be hinted to testing? It fixes a security issue. It has a udeb. unblocked Cheers Luk -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org

Unblock openssl

Hi, Can openssl 0.9.8g-16 be hinted to testing? It fixes a security issue. It has a udeb. Kurt -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org