On Sun, Sep 13, 2009 at 06:28:18PM +0100, Ben Hutchings wrote:
In the mean time, 2.6.30 has had more stable updates, and there are many
other bugs with patches available (the most important being #541307). I
propose that we should make another upload of 2.6.30, although this will
change the
Hi.
On Sep 13 2009, Martin Michlmayr wrote:
* Ben Hutchings b...@decadent.org.uk [2009-09-13 18:28]:
In the mean time, 2.6.30 has had more stable updates, and there are many
other bugs with patches available (the most important being #541307). I
propose that we should make another upload
Although Linux 2.6.31 has been released, it has a number of known
regressions and I think we will wait for 2.6.31.1 before uploading to
unstable. Most of the kernel team will be meeting in Portland from
22-26 September and I would expect the first upload to be done after
that.
In the mean time,
* Ben Hutchings b...@decadent.org.uk [2009-09-13 18:28]:
In the mean time, 2.6.30 has had more stable updates, and there are many
other bugs with patches available (the most important being #541307). I
propose that we should make another upload of 2.6.30, although this will
change the kernel
Hello Ben,
On Sun, Sep 13, 2009 at 2:28 PM, Ben Hutchings b...@decadent.org.uk wrote:
Although Linux 2.6.31 has been released, it has a number of known
regressions and I think we will wait for 2.6.31.1 before uploading to
unstable. Most of the kernel team will be meeting in Portland from
Ben Hutchings wrote:
Although Linux 2.6.31 has been released, it has a number of known
regressions and I think we will wait for 2.6.31.1 before uploading to
unstable. Most of the kernel team will be meeting in Portland from
22-26 September and I would expect the first upload to be done after
6 matches
Mail list logo
