Re: Uploading GNOME 2.24 to sid

2009-03-05 Thread Josselin Mouette
Le dimanche 15 février 2009 à 12:26 +0100, Josselin Mouette a écrit : The upgrade includes the following library transitions : * libeel2-2.22 → libeel2-2.24 * libgnome-desktop-2 → libgnome-desktop-2-7 * libgnomekbd2 → libgnomekbd3 * libgucharmap6 → libgucharmap7 (API

Re: Uploading GNOME 2.24 to sid

2009-02-22 Thread Samuel Thibault
Bastian Blank, le Sun 15 Feb 2009 22:14:54 +0100, a écrit : On Sun, Feb 15, 2009 at 09:13:33PM +0100, Josselin Mouette wrote: Unless you can find someone who is committed to make GTK+ work on the DirectFB backend, I strongly recommend that the installer considers using X11 instead. Can

Re: [directfb-dev] [lu...@debian.org: Re: Uploading GNOME 2.24 to sid]

2009-02-18 Thread Sven Neumann
Hi, On Mon, 2009-02-16 at 23:50 +0100, Masse Nicolas wrote: just to say that I made a patch in order to get the last version of gtk working with directfb. This pach is available here: http://bugzilla.gnome.org/attachment.cgi?id=126611action=view Probably not perfect, but at least with this

Re: Uploading GNOME 2.24 to sid

2009-02-16 Thread Josselin Mouette
Le dimanche 15 février 2009 à 22:14 +0100, Bastian Blank a écrit : Can you do a size estimate for this? It would need in addition - the X server, - evdev input module and - a framebuffer video module. Anything else? XKB data, a number of libraries, a fixed font, I guess. Currently GTK+

Re: Uploading GNOME 2.24 to sid

2009-02-16 Thread Julien Cristau
On Mon, 2009-02-16 at 12:16 +0100, Josselin Mouette wrote: Le dimanche 15 février 2009 à 22:14 +0100, Bastian Blank a écrit : Can you do a size estimate for this? It would need in addition - the X server, - evdev input module and - a framebuffer video module. Anything else? XKB

Re: Uploading GNOME 2.24 to sid

2009-02-16 Thread Colin Watson
On Mon, Feb 16, 2009 at 02:49:11PM +0100, Julien Cristau wrote: On Mon, 2009-02-16 at 12:16 +0100, Josselin Mouette wrote: XKB data, a number of libraries, a fixed font, I guess. Some sort of XKB data will probably be needed by console-setup, AIUI (although looking closer it seems that the

Re: Uploading GNOME 2.24 to sid

2009-02-16 Thread Davide Viti
I've forwarded lunar's message to the directfb ML (directfb-...@directfb.org) and got the following reply: - From: Niels Roest npro...@gmail.com Date: Mon, 16 Feb 2009 16:47:00 +0100 To: Davide Viti zino...@tiscali.it Subject: Re: [directfb-dev] [lu...@debian.org: Re: Uploading GNOME 2.24

Re: [directfb-dev] Uploading GNOME 2.24 to sid

2009-02-16 Thread Sven Neumann
Hi, On Mon, 2009-02-16 at 17:26 +0100, Davide Viti wrote: So I see the issue, I also see patches floating around (such as mentioned by Colin Watson e.g.) and I'm also willing to but effort in this to get it working again. Thing is, with the submitted patch, I do not see someone at GTK

Re: [directfb-dev] [lu...@debian.org: Re: Uploading GNOME 2.24 to sid]

2009-02-16 Thread Masse Nicolas
Hi, just to say that I made a patch in order to get the last version of gtk working with directfb. This pach is available here: http://bugzilla.gnome.org/attachment.cgi?id=126611action=view Probably not perfect, but at least with this patch GTK is compiling and running. (I had some graphical

Uploading GNOME 2.24 to sid

2009-02-15 Thread Josselin Mouette
Hi, as suggested in the release announcement, I’m preparing to upload pieces of GNOME 2.24 to sid. Of course this has an impact on many packages. There are shlibs bumps in most libraries, especially libpango1.0-0 and libgtk2.0-0 (libglib2.0-0 has a symbols file). This also includes synchronizing

Re: Uploading GNOME 2.24 to sid

2009-02-15 Thread Otavio Salvador
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Josselin Mouette j...@debian.org writes: ... * Broken graphical installer, until someone updates our GTK+ DirectFB patches ... Is all of that OK with the release team? - From d-i POV this is a serious issue since we will not allowed

Re: Uploading GNOME 2.24 to sid

2009-02-15 Thread Josselin Mouette
Le dimanche 15 février 2009 à 15:00 -0300, Otavio Salvador a écrit : * Broken graphical installer, until someone updates our GTK+ DirectFB patches ... Is all of that OK with the release team? - From d-i POV this is a serious issue since we will not allowed to test the

Re: Uploading GNOME 2.24 to sid

2009-02-15 Thread Otavio Salvador
Josselin Mouette j...@debian.org writes: Le dimanche 15 février 2009 à 15:00 -0300, Otavio Salvador a écrit : * Broken graphical installer, until someone updates our GTK+ DirectFB patches ... Is all of that OK with the release team? - From d-i POV this is a serious issue

Re: Uploading GNOME 2.24 to sid

2009-02-15 Thread Josselin Mouette
Le dimanche 15 février 2009 à 17:05 -0300, Otavio Salvador a écrit : Your comment fears me even more since it does look that we can end up without directfb support for long time... I think you agree with me that Graphical Installer can't be droped from Debian without a lot of people being

Re: Uploading GNOME 2.24 to sid

2009-02-15 Thread Otavio Salvador
Josselin Mouette j...@debian.org writes: Le dimanche 15 février 2009 à 17:05 -0300, Otavio Salvador a écrit : Your comment fears me even more since it does look that we can end up without directfb support for long time... I think you agree with me that Graphical Installer can't be droped from

Re: Uploading GNOME 2.24 to sid

2009-02-15 Thread Colin Watson
On Sun, Feb 15, 2009 at 05:05:35PM -0300, Otavio Salvador wrote: Josselin Mouette j...@debian.org writes: Le dimanche 15 février 2009 à 15:00 -0300, Otavio Salvador a écrit : * Broken graphical installer, until someone updates our GTK+ DirectFB patches ... Is all of

Re: Uploading GNOME 2.24 to sid

2009-02-15 Thread Bastian Blank
On Sun, Feb 15, 2009 at 09:13:33PM +0100, Josselin Mouette wrote: Unless you can find someone who is committed to make GTK+ work on the DirectFB backend, I strongly recommend that the installer considers using X11 instead. Can you do a size estimate for this? It would need in addition - the X

Re: Uploading GNOME 2.24 to sid

2009-02-15 Thread Julien BLACHE
Bastian Blank wa...@debian.org wrote: Hi, Can you do a size estimate for this? It would need in addition - the X server, - evdev input module and - a framebuffer video module. Anything else? HAL and DBus to go with input-evdev, I guess? JB. -- Julien BLACHE - Debian GNU/Linux

Re: Uploading GNOME 2.24 to sid

2009-02-15 Thread Luis Matos
Dom, 2009-02-15 às 22:14 +0100, Bastian Blank escreveu: On Sun, Feb 15, 2009 at 09:13:33PM +0100, Josselin Mouette wrote: Unless you can find someone who is committed to make GTK+ work on the DirectFB backend, I strongly recommend that the installer considers using X11 instead. Can you

Re: Uploading GNOME 2.24 to sid

2009-02-15 Thread Otavio Salvador
Bastian Blank wa...@debian.org writes: On Sun, Feb 15, 2009 at 09:13:33PM +0100, Josselin Mouette wrote: Unless you can find someone who is committed to make GTK+ work on the DirectFB backend, I strongly recommend that the installer considers using X11 instead. Can you do a size estimate

Re: Uploading GNOME 2.24 to sid

2009-02-15 Thread Otavio Salvador
Luis Matos g...@otiliamatos.ath.cx writes: Dom, 2009-02-15 às 22:14 +0100, Bastian Blank escreveu: On Sun, Feb 15, 2009 at 09:13:33PM +0100, Josselin Mouette wrote: Unless you can find someone who is committed to make GTK+ work on the DirectFB backend, I strongly recommend that the

Re: Uploading GNOME 2.24 to sid

2009-02-15 Thread Jérémy Bobbio
On Sun, Feb 15, 2009 at 10:04:10PM -0300, Otavio Salvador wrote: On Sun, Feb 15, 2009 at 09:13:33PM +0100, Josselin Mouette wrote: Unless you can find someone who is committed to make GTK+ work on the DirectFB backend, I strongly recommend that the installer considers using X11 instead.