Re: current blockers?

2005-11-15 Thread Steve Langasek
On Tue, Nov 15, 2005 at 08:16:29AM +0100, Florian Weimer wrote: * Nathanael Nerode: * removal of non-free docs etc. from all packages IIRC, the release goal is to release without GNU FDL documentation only, not to remove all non-free documentation. At least I'm not aware of a coordinated

current blockers?

2005-11-14 Thread Nathanael Nerode
So if I'm not mistaken, these are the current release blockers (based on http://lists.debian.org/debian-devel-announce/2005/10/msg4.html) There's also a fair amount of testing progression necessary of course. Have I got this about right? * releaseable binutils in unstable (necessary for

Re: current blockers?

2005-11-14 Thread Daniel Jacobowitz
On Mon, Nov 14, 2005 at 12:36:30PM -0500, Nathanael Nerode wrote: * releaseable glibc in unstable (likewise) This should be done now. There is a substantial glibc upgrade on the horizon, but I told Steve yesterday that we have no plans to do it until this one has reached testing and gotten

Re: current blockers?

2005-11-14 Thread Florian Weimer
* Nathanael Nerode: * removal of non-free docs etc. from all packages IIRC, the release goal is to release without GNU FDL documentation only, not to remove all non-free documentation. At least I'm not aware of a coordinated effort in that direction. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL