* Matthias Klose:
- s390: rebuilt by hand on raptor/unstable without problems.
Bastian pointed to #479952 as a possible reason. would it
be possible to do a test-rebuild on the machine which is
used security updates?
I think we can apply a real security patch to all the Sun-based
On Fri, Sep 05, 2008 at 11:16:02PM +0200, Matthias Klose wrote:
- s390: rebuilt by hand on raptor/unstable without problems.
Bastian pointed to #479952 as a possible reason. would it
be possible to do a test-rebuild on the machine which is
used security updates?
Works according to
Florian Weimer writes:
the openjdk-6 package runs the testsuite. if the security team prefers
shorter build times, then the testuite can be disabled in security
uploads.
Uhm, okay.
I didn't change this in the -2 upload.
the testsuite is not run in the cacao-oj6 package.
And build
* Matthias Klose:
Well, you know that there is a T2000 available and if the security team
needs a faster buildd they have to ask.
the estimate is wrong.
I what sense? I quoted the actual build time on lebrun. Is spontini
really faster than that?
the openjdk-6 package runs the testsuite.
Matthias Klose wrote:
proposing a freeze exception for cacao-oj6 for testing. cacao-oj6 is a
copy of the openjdk-6 package with the cacao sources
included. Compared to openjdk-6 on architectures without the Hotspot
JIT support, cacao-oj6 (including a JIT) is a much faster JVM
* Luk Claes:
Matthias Klose wrote:
proposing a freeze exception for cacao-oj6 for testing. cacao-oj6 is a
copy of the openjdk-6 package with the cacao sources
included. Compared to openjdk-6 on architectures without the Hotspot
JIT support, cacao-oj6 (including a JIT) is a much faster JVM
On Sun, Aug 24, 2008 at 09:43:38PM +0200, Florian Weimer wrote:
A security update for the OpenJDK 6 source base will require more than
60 hours of armel build time, and more than two weeks[1] on sparc for
openjdk-6 alone (don't know cocoa-oj6 yet).
The fastjar changes are aimed to decrease
Florian Weimer writes:
* Luk Claes:
Matthias Klose wrote:
proposing a freeze exception for cacao-oj6 for testing. cacao-oj6 is a
copy of the openjdk-6 package with the cacao sources
included. Compared to openjdk-6 on architectures without the Hotspot
JIT support, cacao-oj6 (including
Bastian Blank writes:
On Sun, Aug 24, 2008 at 09:43:38PM +0200, Florian Weimer wrote:
A security update for the OpenJDK 6 source base will require more than
60 hours of armel build time, and more than two weeks[1] on sparc for
openjdk-6 alone (don't know cocoa-oj6 yet).
The fastjar
proposing a freeze exception for cacao-oj6 for testing. cacao-oj6 is a
copy of the openjdk-6 package with the cacao sources
included. Compared to openjdk-6 on architectures without the Hotspot
JIT support, cacao-oj6 (including a JIT) is a much faster JVM on the
architectures where it does build
10 matches
Mail list logo
