Hi, I never got feedback on the binutils/GCC plans outlined last July https://lists.debian.org/debian-release/2020/07/msg00008.html
At this point, I don't think another gcc-10 upload is needed, as people can work around existing issues by using gcc-9, which still is used as a build dependency. I will prepare a gcc-10 package for bullseye-backports, based on the upstream 10.3.0 release. The upgrade issue reported as #972936 is not confirmed, and missing feedback if the suggested solution is working. To check the current status of gcc-10 as found in experimental, I built a package for unstable (including the suggested fix for #972936) at deb [trusted=yes] http://people.debian.org/~doko/gcc/gcc10 ./ and asked Lucas Nussbaum for a comparative test rebuild. Results can be found at https://people.debian.org/~doko/logs/20210228/diff.vanilla-gcc10 Progressions: $ awk '/Failed OK/ {print $1}' diff.vanilla-gcc10 gammaray mkvtoolnix nheko odb Regressions: $ awk '/OK Failed/ {print $1}' diff.vanilla-gcc10 gsequencer The latter filed as #983868, having both a work around and an upstream fix. Matthias