On Sun, Aug 01, 2004 at 08:30:54PM -0400, Jay Berkenbilt wrote:
One maintainer replied to my message in time stating that his upload
was prepared and he was just waiting for his sponsor.
Which maintainer was this? A sponsored MU is always better than an NMU,
so I'd be happy to sponsor an
One maintainer replied to my message in time stating that his upload
was prepared and he was just waiting for his sponsor.
Which maintainer was this? A sponsored MU is always better than an NMU,
so I'd be happy to sponsor an upload if needed.
Nico Golde [EMAIL PROTECTED] for
On Mon, Aug 02, 2004 at 11:36:04AM -0400, Jay Berkenbilt wrote:
One maintainer replied to my message in time stating that his upload
was prepared and he was just waiting for his sponsor.
Which maintainer was this? A sponsored MU is always better than an NMU,
so I'd be happy to
One maintainer replied to my message in time stating that his upload
was prepared and he was just waiting for his sponsor.
Which maintainer was this? A sponsored MU is always better than an
NMU,
so I'd be happy to sponsor an upload if needed.
Nico Golde
On Mon, Aug 02, 2004 at 12:08:48PM -0400, Jay Berkenbilt wrote:
[...]
FYI I've just filed this rc-bug (#262995), because we thought gtksee
was accidentally missed, as the current maintainer is a DD and does
not need a sponsor and therefore does not match the profile. - Sorry.
Did you find
Hi,
One maintainer replied to my message in time stating that his
upload
was prepared and he was just waiting for his sponsor.
Which maintainer was this? A sponsored MU is always better than
an NMU,
so I'd be happy to sponsor an upload if needed.
Nico Golde [EMAIL
I filed 69 RC bugs: one against all but one of the packages I
mentioned in my previous message. One maintainer replied to my
message in time stating that his upload was prepared and he was just
waiting for his sponsor. (I can sympathize with that. ;-]) As per
prior discussion, I have posted to
7 matches
Mail list logo
