Your message dated Sat, 07 Oct 2023 12:41:28 +0100
with message-id
<84bb5ff8312f749ebe536897993782bf35aa1977.ca...@adam-barratt.org.uk>
and subject line Closing opu requests for updates included in 11.8
has caused the Debian Bug report #1052027,
regarding bullseye-pu: package cargo-mozilla/
Your message dated Sat, 07 Oct 2023 12:41:28 +0100
with message-id
<84bb5ff8312f749ebe536897993782bf35aa1977.ca...@adam-barratt.org.uk>
and subject line Closing opu requests for updates included in 11.8
has caused the Debian Bug report #1051051,
regarding bullseye-pu: package rustc-mozilla/
llseye-pu: package
cargo-mozilla/0.66.0+ds1-1~deb11u1
Added tag(s) pending; removed tag(s) confirmed.
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
--
1052027: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1052027
Debian Bug Tracking System
C
package release.debian.org
tags 1052027 = bullseye pending
thanks
Hi,
The upload referenced by this bug report has been flagged for acceptance into
the proposed-updates queue for Debian bullseye.
Thanks for your contribution!
Upload details
==
Package: cargo-mozilla
Version
On 16/09/2023 18:01, Adam D. Barratt wrote:
Control: tags -1 + confirmed
On Sat, 2023-09-16 at 11:15 +0200, Emilio Pozuelo Monfort wrote:
Following up on #1051051, this updates cargo-mozilla for the upcoming
Firefox ESR 115. Just like for rustc-mozilla, the risk here is small
as this package
Processing control commands:
> tags -1 + confirmed
Bug #1052027 [release.debian.org] bullseye-pu: package
cargo-mozilla/0.66.0+ds1-1~deb11u1
Added tag(s) confirmed.
--
1052027: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1052027
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.
Control: tags -1 + confirmed
On Sat, 2023-09-16 at 11:15 +0200, Emilio Pozuelo Monfort wrote:
> Following up on #1051051, this updates cargo-mozilla for the upcoming
> Firefox ESR 115. Just like for rustc-mozilla, the risk here is small
> as this package is only used to build fi
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
Tags: bullseye
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: pu
X-Debbugs-Cc: pkg-rust-maintain...@alioth-lists.debian.net
Hi,
Following up on #1051051, this updates cargo-mozilla for the upcoming
Firefox ESR 115. Just like for rustc-mozilla
llseye-pu: package
rustc-mozilla/1.63.0+dfsg1-2~deb11u1
Added tag(s) pending.
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
--
1051051: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1051051
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
package release.debian.org
tags 1051051 = bullseye pending
thanks
Hi,
The upload referenced by this bug report has been flagged for acceptance into
the proposed-updates queue for Debian bullseye.
Thanks for your contribution!
Upload details
==
Package: rustc-mozilla
Version
ESR release in *stable.
This will require rustc/cargo/cbindgen backports as usual. For bookworm
we're in a good shape for this update, but for bullseye and buster we'll
need all three updates.
For rustc-mozilla, I've used the version from bookworm. Hopefully I got
all the stage0 binaries this time
as usual. For bookworm
we're in a good shape for this update, but for bullseye and buster we'll
need all three updates.
For rustc-mozilla, I've used the version from bookworm. Hopefully I got
all the stage0 binaries this time.
Risk is low as this package is only used to build FF/TB. I have
Your message dated Sat, 10 Sep 2022 13:40:55 +0100
with message-id
<2cfc9645343bdb910fe19c07bddfec2c428346a3.ca...@adam-barratt.org.uk>
and subject line Closing requests for updates included in 10.13
has caused the Debian Bug report #1014912,
regarding buster-pu: package cargo-mozilla/0.
Your message dated Sat, 10 Sep 2022 13:40:55 +0100
with message-id
<2cfc9645343bdb910fe19c07bddfec2c428346a3.ca...@adam-barratt.org.uk>
and subject line Closing requests for updates included in 10.13
has caused the Debian Bug report #1014907,
regarding buster-pu: package rustc-mozilla/
Your message dated Sat, 10 Sep 2022 13:36:19 +0100
with message-id
<92fe43e7805e82e43100a6471ccbf91cd9a12944.ca...@adam-barratt.org.uk>
and subject line Closing requests for updates in 11.5
has caused the Debian Bug report #1014327,
regarding bullseye-pu: package cargo-mozilla/0.57.0-7~d
ter-pu: package
rustc-mozilla/1.59.0+dfsg1-1~deb10u1
Ignoring request to alter tags of bug #1014907 to the same tags previously set
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
--
1014907: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1014907
Debian Bug Tracki
package release.debian.org
tags 1014907 = buster pending
thanks
Hi,
The upload referenced by this bug report has been flagged for acceptance into
the proposed-updates queue for Debian buster.
Thanks for your contribution!
Upload details
==
Package: rustc-mozilla
Version: 1.59.0
rustc-mozilla in buster, in preparation for Firefox 102.
I'm attaching the debdiff from the bullseye update. The windows target
is disabled because it was already disabled in buster, and is something
we don't really care about for our purpose.
I've uploaded the package already to oldstable-new
llseye-pu: package
rustc-mozilla/1.59.0+dfsg1-1~deb11u1
Ignoring request to alter tags of bug #1014324 to the same tags previously set
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
--
1014324: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1014324
Debian Bug
package release.debian.org
tags 1014324 = bullseye pending
thanks
Hi,
The upload referenced by this bug report has been flagged for acceptance into
the proposed-updates queue for Debian bullseye.
Thanks for your contribution!
Upload details
==
Package: rustc-mozilla
Version
llseye-pu: package
rustc-mozilla/1.59.0+dfsg1-1~deb11u1
Ignoring request to alter tags of bug #1014324 to the same tags previously set
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
--
1014324: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1014324
Debian Bug
package release.debian.org
tags 1014324 = bullseye pending
thanks
Hi,
The upload referenced by this bug report has been flagged for acceptance into
the proposed-updates queue for Debian bullseye.
Thanks for your contribution!
Upload details
==
Package: rustc-mozilla
Version
On 04/07/2022 10:51, Emilio Pozuelo Monfort wrote:
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
Tags: bullseye
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: pu
X-Debbugs-Cc: pkg-rust-maintain...@alioth-lists.debian.net
Hi,
This updates rustc-mozilla in bullseye from 1.51 to 1.59. I
ter-pu: package
rustc-mozilla/1.59.0+dfsg1-1~deb10u1
Ignoring request to alter tags of bug #1014907 to the same tags previously set
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
--
1014907: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1014907
Debian Bug Tracki
package release.debian.org
tags 1014907 = buster pending
thanks
Hi,
The upload referenced by this bug report has been flagged for acceptance into
the proposed-updates queue for Debian buster.
Thanks for your contribution!
Upload details
==
Package: rustc-mozilla
Version: 1.59.0
On 14/07/2022 11:02, Emilio Pozuelo Monfort wrote:
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
Tags: buster
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: pu
X-Debbugs-Cc: pkg-rust-maintain...@alioth-lists.debian.net
Hi,
This updates rustc-mozilla in buster, in preparation for Firefox
ter-pu: package
rustc-mozilla/1.59.0+dfsg1-1~deb10u1
Added tag(s) pending.
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
--
1014907: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1014907
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
package release.debian.org
tags 1014912 = buster pending
thanks
Hi,
The upload referenced by this bug report has been flagged for acceptance into
the proposed-updates queue for Debian buster.
Thanks for your contribution!
Upload details
==
Package: cargo-mozilla
Version: 0.57.0-7
ter-pu: package
cargo-mozilla/0.57.0-7~deb10u1
Added tag(s) pending.
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
--
1014912: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1014912
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
package release.debian.org
tags 1014907 = buster pending
thanks
Hi,
The upload referenced by this bug report has been flagged for acceptance into
the proposed-updates queue for Debian buster.
Thanks for your contribution!
Upload details
==
Package: rustc-mozilla
Version: 1.59.0
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
Tags: buster
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: pu
X-Debbugs-Cc: pkg-rust-maintain...@alioth-lists.debian.net
Hi,
This updates cargo-mozilla in buster. The debdiff against the bullseye
update is trivial, I bumped the rustc-mozilla
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
Tags: buster
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: pu
X-Debbugs-Cc: pkg-rust-maintain...@alioth-lists.debian.net
Hi,
This updates rustc-mozilla in buster, in preparation for Firefox 102.
I'm attaching the debdiff from the bullseye
llseye-pu: package
rustc-mozilla/1.59.0+dfsg1-1~deb11u1
Added tag(s) pending.
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
--
1014324: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1014324
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
llseye-pu: package
cargo-mozilla/0.57.0-7~deb11u1
Added tag(s) pending.
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
--
1014327: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1014327
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
package release.debian.org
tags 1014327 = bullseye pending
thanks
Hi,
The upload referenced by this bug report has been flagged for acceptance into
the proposed-updates queue for Debian bullseye.
Thanks for your contribution!
Upload details
==
Package: cargo-mozilla
Version
package release.debian.org
tags 1014324 = bullseye pending
thanks
Hi,
The upload referenced by this bug report has been flagged for acceptance into
the proposed-updates queue for Debian bullseye.
Thanks for your contribution!
Upload details
==
Package: rustc-mozilla
Version
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
Tags: bullseye
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: pu
X-Debbugs-Cc: pkg-rust-maintain...@alioth-lists.debian.net
This brings cargo 0.57 into bullseye as src:cargo-mozilla, following the
packaging changes done in previous releases
Your message dated Sat, 26 Mar 2022 12:02:22 +
with message-id
<540de30a27d37c3ff416b94b1adf7ff2a2cab257.ca...@adam-barratt.org.uk>
and subject line Closing requests for updates in 10.12
has caused the Debian Bug report #1002740,
regarding buster-pu: package rustc-mozilla/1.51.0+d
Your message dated Sat, 26 Mar 2022 12:02:22 +
with message-id
<540de30a27d37c3ff416b94b1adf7ff2a2cab257.ca...@adam-barratt.org.uk>
and subject line Closing requests for updates in 10.12
has caused the Debian Bug report #1001752,
regarding buster-pu: package cargo-mozilla/0.47.0-3~d
Your message dated Sat, 26 Mar 2022 12:02:22 +
with message-id
<540de30a27d37c3ff416b94b1adf7ff2a2cab257.ca...@adam-barratt.org.uk>
and subject line Closing requests for updates in 10.12
has caused the Debian Bug report #1001043,
regarding buster-pu: package rustc-mozilla/1.51.0+d
ter-pu: package
rustc-mozilla/1.51.0+dfsg1-1~deb10u2
Added tag(s) pending.
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
--
1002740: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1002740
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
package release.debian.org
tags 1002740 = buster pending
thanks
Hi,
The upload referenced by this bug report has been flagged for acceptance into
the proposed-updates queue for Debian buster.
Thanks for your contribution!
Upload details
==
Package: rustc-mozilla
Version: 1.51.0
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
Tags: buster
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: pu
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA512
OSRM,
I have prepared a follow-up update of rustc-mozilla for buster (c.f.
#1001043). This update fixes build failures on i386
ter-pu: package
cargo-mozilla/0.47.0-3~deb10u1
Added tag(s) pending; removed tag(s) confirmed.
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
--
1001752: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1001752
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.d
package release.debian.org
tags 1001752 = buster pending
thanks
Hi,
The upload referenced by this bug report has been flagged for acceptance into
the proposed-updates queue for Debian buster.
Thanks for your contribution!
Upload details
==
Package: cargo-mozilla
Version: 0.47.0-3
rustc-mozilla/1.51.0+dfsg1-1~deb11u1
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.
(NB: If you are a system administrator and have n
On Sat, 27 Nov 2021 14:09:19 -0500 Roberto
=?iso-8859-1?Q?C=2E_S=E1nchez?= wrote:
On Sat, Nov 27, 2021 at 05:47:45PM +, Adam D. Barratt wrote:
>
> As a matter of interest, why was 1.51 the version chosen? I'm mostly
> curious as that version is not currently in any suite in Debian.
>
I am
On 15/12/2021 20:09, Adam D. Barratt wrote:
Control: tags -1 + confirmed
On Wed, 2021-12-15 at 11:38 +0100, Emilio Pozuelo Monfort wrote:
This update to cargo (with a renamed name to avoid disruption in the
rust/cargo ecosystem) is needed by the firefox / thunderbird updates.
It's a backport
Processing control commands:
> tags -1 + confirmed
Bug #1001752 [release.debian.org] buster-pu: package
cargo-mozilla/0.47.0-3~deb10u1
Added tag(s) confirmed.
--
1001752: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1001752
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.
Control: tags -1 + confirmed
On Wed, 2021-12-15 at 11:38 +0100, Emilio Pozuelo Monfort wrote:
> This update to cargo (with a renamed name to avoid disruption in the
> rust/cargo ecosystem) is needed by the firefox / thunderbird updates.
> It's a backport of the version in bullseye, which is
upload so that it's dfsg and easy to
verify.
I've used this to build and test firefox ESR 91.3 on amd64.
Cheers,
Emilio
diff -Nru cargo-0.47.0/debian/cargo.bash-completion
cargo-mozilla-0.47.0/debian/cargo.bash-completion
--- cargo-0.47.0/debian/cargo.bash-completion 2019-01-24 05:34
ter-pu: package
rustc-mozilla/1.51.0+dfsg1-1~deb10u1
Added tag(s) pending.
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
--
1001043: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1001043
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
package release.debian.org
tags 1001043 = buster pending
thanks
Hi,
The upload referenced by this bug report has been flagged for acceptance into
the proposed-updates queue for Debian buster.
Thanks for your contribution!
Upload details
==
Package: rustc-mozilla
Version: 1.51.0
that LLVM and rustc are not going
in via security update. Apologies for the confusion.
As a quick follow-up to this, with the 11.2 point release being next
weekend, and thus the p-u freeze this weekend, I note that the rustc-
mozilla upload is not yet in NEW, so we're starting to get quite close
; > > > basically
> > > > > every other update to both packages occurs.
> > > > >
> > > > Quite right. I conflated the fact that LLVM and rustc are not going
> > > > in via security update. Apologies for the confusion.
> > >
> > &g
llseye-pu: package
rustc-mozilla/1.51.0+dfsg1-1~deb11u1
Added tag(s) pending.
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
--
1000472: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1000472
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
package release.debian.org
tags 1000472 = bullseye pending
thanks
Hi,
The upload referenced by this bug report has been flagged for acceptance into
the proposed-updates queue for Debian bullseye.
Thanks for your contribution!
Upload details
==
Package: rustc-mozilla
Version
hat LLVM and rustc are not going
> > > in via security update. Apologies for the confusion.
> >
> > As a quick follow-up to this, with the 11.2 point release being next
> > weekend, and thus the p-u freeze this weekend, I note that the rustc-
> > mozilla upload is not
basically
> > > every other update to both packages occurs.
> > >
> > Quite right. I conflated the fact that LLVM and rustc are not going
> > in via security update. Apologies for the confusion.
>
> As a quick follow-up to this, with the 11.2 point release bei
> in via security update. Apologies for the confusion.
As a quick follow-up to this, with the 11.2 point release being next
weekend, and thus the p-u freeze this weekend, I note that the rustc-
mozilla upload is not yet in NEW, so we're starting to get quite close
timing wise.
Regards,
Adam
is called
rustc-mozilla and the binary packages are named rust-mozilla-*, or
rustc-mozilla-*, or librust-mozilla-*, and so on. For further
discussion and explanation on the precise motivations for this are in
the discussion logged at #1000472.
Regards,
- -Roberto
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE
Am Tue, Nov 30, 2021 at 06:00:57PM + schrieb Adam D. Barratt:
> I was assuming the plan was for the Firefox and Thunderbird updates to
> be released via the security archive.
Definitely! For the last ESR round DSA deployed a change to make the
security chroots include buster-proposed-updates.
On Tue, Nov 30, 2021 at 06:00:57PM +, Adam D. Barratt wrote:
> On Tue, 2021-11-30 at 09:37 -0500, Roberto C.Sánchez wrote:
> > If there are no objections, I will proceed with uploading within the
> > next 24 hours. I'd like to ensure that the new FF/TB make it into
> > the next point release
On Tue, 2021-11-30 at 09:37 -0500, Roberto C.Sánchez wrote:
> If there are no objections, I will proceed with uploading within the
> next 24 hours. I'd like to ensure that the new FF/TB make it into
> the next point release if at all possible and that work is currently
> blocked by the need for
On Mon, Nov 29, 2021 at 07:54:15PM +0200, Adrian Bunk wrote:
> On Mon, Nov 29, 2021 at 05:32:30PM +0100, Julien Cristau wrote:
> >
> > 2 things:
> > - I think we should pick 1.53 if possible, since that's what mozilla use
> > for their esr91 binaries
>
> I was
gt; > Following the model of what was done for gcc, nasm, and nodejs, I was
> > considering source package rustc-mozilla with a single binary package
> > (also rustc-mozilla) to ensure that rdeps don't end up getting surprised
> > by a new rustc. Would this be considered acceptabl
ssociated with providing a significant new version
> of rustc in the rustc binary package (along with the associated library
> packages), that I prepare the 1.51 rustc package with a different name.
> Following the model of what was done for gcc, nasm, and nodejs, I was
> considering source
; > Following the model of what was done for gcc, nasm, and nodejs, I was
> > considering source package rustc-mozilla with a single binary package
> > (also rustc-mozilla) to ensure that rdeps don't end up getting
> > surprised
> > by a new rustc. Would this be c
t new
> version
> of rustc in the rustc binary package (along with the associated
> library
> packages), that I prepare the 1.51 rustc package with a different
> name.
> Following the model of what was done for gcc, nasm, and nodejs, I was
> considering source package rustc-mozilla
, I was
considering source package rustc-mozilla with a single binary package
(also rustc-mozilla) to ensure that rdeps don't end up getting surprised
by a new rustc. Would this be considered acceptable for the bullseye
and buster uploads of rustc 1.51?
(I intend to file a separate bug for buster
Hello Mehtilde,
Am 25.10.20 um 13:39 schrieb Mechtilde Stehmann:
>> On a related note, britney isn't attempting to migrate the 2.18 upload
>> because:
>>
>> Not built on buildd: arch all binaries uploaded by o...@mechtilde.de, a new
>> source-only upload is needed to allow migration
>
> Do you
Hallo Adam
Am 24.10.20 um 18:00 schrieb Adam D. Barratt:
>
> So should we be expecting further p-u uploads for 2.18?
packages are uploaded.
>
> On a related note, britney isn't attempting to migrate the 2.18 upload
> because:
>
> Not built on buildd: arch all binaries uploaded by
On Fri, 2020-10-16 at 20:33 +0200, Mechtilde Stehmann wrote:
> Hello,
>
> i added moxext-maintainers, too.
>
>
> Am 16.10.20 um 19:25 schrieb Adam D. Barratt:
> > [overrode Reply-To: to keep the list included]
> >
> > On Sat, 2020-10-10 at 21:29 +0200, Mechtilde Stehmann wrote:
> > > I want to
Adam D. Barratt schrieb:
> There's a school of thought which says that it doesn't make sense to
> include the plugins in the Debian archive at all, and we should instead
> suggest that users install and update plugins from the upstream
> repositories directly.
The TB 68->78 is a little special
ings in a better way in the future?
>
> This is part of a slightly wider discussion that's come up a few times
> before, around the handling of updates to plugins for Mozilla products
> (and I guess others, but Firefox and Thunderbird are the ones most
> often affected).
>
>
en).
>
> How can we handle such things in a better way in the future?
This is part of a slightly wider discussion that's come up a few times
before, around the handling of updates to plugins for Mozilla products
(and I guess others, but Firefox and Thunderbird are the ones most
often a
Your message dated Sat, 08 Feb 2020 14:23:35 +
with message-id
and subject line Closing bugs included in 9.12
has caused the Debian Bug report #940715,
regarding stretch-pu: package nodejs-mozilla 8.11.1~dfsg-2~deb9u1
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been
Your message dated Sat, 08 Feb 2020 14:23:35 +
with message-id
and subject line Closing bugs included in 9.12
has caused the Debian Bug report #940715,
regarding stretch-pu: package nodejs-mozilla 8.11.1~dfsg-2~deb9u1
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been
tch-pu: package nodejs-mozilla
8.11.1~dfsg-2~deb9u1
Added tag(s) pending.
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
--
940715: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=940715
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
package release.debian.org
tags 940715 = stretch pending
thanks
Hi,
The upload referenced by this bug report has been flagged for acceptance into
the proposed-updates queue for Debian stretch.
Thanks for your contribution!
Upload details
==
Package: nodejs-mozilla
Version: 8.11.1
in other packages.
I attach the debdiff from the stretch-backports package.
Thanks,
Emilio
diff -Nru nodejs-8.11.1~dfsg/debian/changelog
nodejs-mozilla-8.11.1~dfsg/debian/changelog
--- nodejs-8.11.1~dfsg/debian/changelog 2018-05-02 08:09:28.0 +0200
+++ nodejs-mozilla-8.11.1~dfsg/debian/changelog
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
Tags: stretch
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: pu
Hi,
Another package needed for firefox-esr 68. I didn't want to update src:nodejs to
a newer version, so just like for nasm-mozilla this introduces a newer version
as nodejs
package release.debian.org
tags 936067 = stretch pending
thanks
Hi,
The upload referenced by this bug report has been flagged for acceptance into
the proposed-updates queue for Debian stretch.
Thanks for your contribution!
Upload details
==
Package: nasm-mozilla
Version: 2.14-1
tch-pu: package nasm-mozilla 2.14-1~deb9u1
Added tag(s) pending.
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
--
936067: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=936067
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
ent along the road of providing a separate package so that we
don't risk breaking other build-rdeps. I went with 2.14-1 from buster while at
it, so we have the same version. To avoid a conflict against nasm, the binaries
are provided under /usr/lib/nasm-mozilla/.
I'm attaching the debdiff from buste
Your message dated Sat, 27 Apr 2019 08:24:04 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#922791: Removed package(s) from stable
has caused the Debian Bug report #922791,
regarding RM: mozilla-gnome-keyring -- RoQA; incompatible with newer
firefox-esr versions
to be marked as done.
This means
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> retitle 922791 RM: mozilla-gnome-keyring -- RoQA; incompatible with newer
> firefox-esr versions
Bug #922791 [release.debian.org] RM: mozilla-gnome-keyring/0.12-1
Changed Bug title to 'RM: mozilla-gnome-keyring -- RoQA; incompatible with
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: rm
Please remove mozilla-gnome-keyring in the next stretch point release, it's
broken with Firefox Quantum.
Cheers,
Moritz
Your message dated Sat, 16 Feb 2019 09:59:59 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#920724: Removed package(s) from stable
has caused the Debian Bug report #920724,
regarding RM: mozilla-noscript -- RoQA; incompatible with newer firefox-esr
versions
to be marked as done.
This means that you
Your message dated Sat, 16 Feb 2019 09:56:40 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#918349: Removed package(s) from stable
has caused the Debian Bug report #918349,
regarding RM: mozilla-dom-inspector -- RoQA; incompatible with newer
firefox-esr versions
to be marked as done.
This means
Your message dated Sat, 16 Feb 2019 09:51:21 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#918258: Removed package(s) from stable
has caused the Debian Bug report #918258,
regarding RM: mozilla-password-editor -- RoQA; incompatible with newer
firefox-esr versions
to be marked as done.
This means
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> retitle 920724 RM: mozilla-noscript -- RoQA; incompatible with newer
> firefox-esr versions
Bug #920724 [release.debian.org] RM: mozilla-noscript/2.9.0.14-1
Changed Bug title to 'RM: mozilla-noscript -- RoQA; incompatible with newer
firef
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: rm
Please remove mozilla-noscript/2.9.0.14-1 from stretch, it's broken with
Firefox >= 57.
Cheers,
Moritz
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> retitle 918258 RM: mozilla-password-editor -- RoQA; incompatible with newer
> firefox-esr versions
Bug #918258 [release.debian.org] RM: mozilla-password-editor/2.10.3-1
Changed Bug title to 'RM: mozilla-password-editor -- RoQA; incomp
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> retitle 918349 RM: mozilla-dom-inspector -- RoQA; incompatible with newer
> firefox-esr versions
Bug #918349 [release.debian.org] RM: mozilla-dom-inspector/1:2.0.16-2
Changed Bug title to 'RM: mozilla-dom-inspector -- RoQA; incomp
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: rm
Please remove mozilla-dom-inspector in the next point release. It's broken
by the Firefox Quantum changes and was already removed from sid.
Cheers,
Moritz
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
Tags: stretch
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: rm
The package does not work with Firefox or Thunderbird 60, see #906834.
Already removed from unstable in #918170.
Your message dated Sat, 17 Sep 2016 13:08:06 +0100
with message-id <1474114086.2011.126.ca...@adam-barratt.org.uk>
and subject line Closing p-u bugs for updates in 8.6
has caused the Debian Bug report #834480,
regarding jessie-pu: package mozilla-noscript/2.9.0.11-1~deb8u1
to be marked a
Processing control commands:
> tags -1 + pending
Bug #834482 [release.debian.org] jessie-pu: package
adblock-plus/2.7.3+dfsg-1~deb8u1
Added tag(s) pending.
--
834482: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=834482
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
Processing control commands:
> tags -1 + pending
Bug #834479 [release.debian.org] jessie-pu: package greasemonkey/3.8-1~deb8u1
Added tag(s) pending.
--
834479: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=834479
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
1 - 100 of 343 matches
Mail list logo
