Re: Blocking (or not) of new udebs

2012-06-26 Thread Christian PERRIER
Quoting Samuel Thibault (sthiba...@debian.org): Just some informations: Adam D. Barratt, le Mon 25 Jun 2012 21:42:23 +0100, a écrit : alsa-{base,driver,lib,utils} espeakup These are for software speech support. And we can probably say that espeakup is under D-I team control, isn't it?

Re: Blocking (or not) of new udebs

2012-06-26 Thread Christian PERRIER
Quoting Adam D. Barratt (a...@adam-barratt.org.uk): That leaves us with the follow list which need categorising: I didn't see eject which is providing a udeb that's used by D-I (to allow for a menu entry to eject the CD from its tray). signature.asc Description: Digital signature

Re: Blocking (or not) of new udebs

2012-06-26 Thread Adam D. Barratt
On Tue, 2012-06-26 at 08:29 +0200, Christian PERRIER wrote: Quoting Adam D. Barratt (a...@adam-barratt.org.uk): That leaves us with the follow list which need categorising: I didn't see eject which is providing a udeb that's used by D-I (to allow for a menu entry to eject the CD from its

Re: Blocking (or not) of new udebs

2012-06-26 Thread Samuel Thibault
Christian PERRIER, le Tue 26 Jun 2012 08:28:26 +0200, a écrit : Quoting Samuel Thibault (sthiba...@debian.org): Just some informations: Adam D. Barratt, le Mon 25 Jun 2012 21:42:23 +0100, a écrit : alsa-{base,driver,lib,utils} espeakup These are for software speech support.

Re: Blocking (or not) of new udebs

2012-06-26 Thread Christian PERRIER
Quoting Samuel Thibault (sthiba...@debian.org): And we can probably say that espeakup is under D-I team control, isn't it? It's under the d-accessibility team, but you and I are the usual uploaders, yes. Not sure I ever uploaded (no time to check this right now). By the way, if you could

Re: Blocking (or not) of new udebs

2012-06-26 Thread Christian PERRIER
Quoting Adam D. Barratt (a...@adam-barratt.org.uk): I didn't see eject which is providing a udeb that's used by D-I (to allow for a menu entry to eject the CD from its tray). That's already present in the list - under can be handled by britney - so I assume the udeb's been around for a

Re: Blocking (or not) of new udebs

2012-06-26 Thread Cyril Brulebois
Adam D. Barratt a...@adam-barratt.org.uk (25/06/2012): That leaves us with the follow list which need categorising: alsa-{base,driver,lib,utils} espeakup fuse grub2 libffi libgcrypt11 libgpg-error libnl3 libpthread-stubs mbr mtdev ndisc6 netdde ntfs-3g open-iscsi syslinux

Blocking (or not) of new udebs

2012-06-25 Thread Adam D. Barratt
Hi, In anticipation of the block-udeb hints being re-enabled, I've been reviewing the currently commented hints and comparing them to the packages in the archive which currently produce udebs. For those packages which were not previously in the list, I've made a few assumptions, detailed below.

Re: Blocking (or not) of new udebs

2012-06-25 Thread Samuel Thibault
Just some informations: Adam D. Barratt, le Mon 25 Jun 2012 21:42:23 +0100, a écrit : alsa-{base,driver,lib,utils} espeakup These are for software speech support. netdde This is hurd-only, and contains the network drivers. Samuel -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to

Re: new udebs

2010-11-19 Thread Adam D. Barratt
On Wed, 2010-10-20 at 21:13 +0100, Adam D. Barratt wrote: There are currently some udeb-producing packages which are neither on the needs approval from a d-i RM before migrating list, nor the explicit can migrate at will list; from a quick scan, many of them appear to be kfreebsd related.

Re: new udebs

2010-11-19 Thread Otavio Salvador
Hello, Sorry by the delay: debian-ports-archive-keyring btrfs-tools espeak isc-dhcp freebsd-libs freebsd-utils libbsd libfakekey libpciaccess libxrender matchbox-keyboard ufsutils zfsutils ttf-sinhala-lklug Those are auto. kfreebsd-kernel-di-amd64 kfreebsd-kernel-di-i386 Needs

Re: new udebs

2010-11-19 Thread Adam D. Barratt
On Fri, 2010-11-19 at 20:05 -0200, Otavio Salvador wrote: debian-ports-archive-keyring btrfs-tools espeak isc-dhcp freebsd-libs freebsd-utils libbsd libfakekey libpciaccess libxrender matchbox-keyboard ufsutils zfsutils ttf-sinhala-lklug Those are auto.

Re: new udebs

2010-10-24 Thread Philipp Kern
On Wed, Oct 20, 2010 at 09:13:50PM +0100, Adam D. Barratt wrote: There are currently some udeb-producing packages which are neither on the needs approval from a d-i RM before migrating list, nor the explicit can migrate at will list; from a quick scan, many of them appear to be kfreebsd

new udebs

2010-10-20 Thread Adam D. Barratt
Hi, There are currently some udeb-producing packages which are neither on the needs approval from a d-i RM before migrating list, nor the explicit can migrate at will list; from a quick scan, many of them appear to be kfreebsd related. I've listed these below; please could you confirm whether