Am 22.03.2013 19:08, schrieb Moritz Mühlenhoff:
Matthias Klose d...@ubuntu.com schrieb:
I'm not familiar with the Java internals, but if we're following that
approach
it would make sense to upgrade Wheezy to the version in experimental
(i.e. 7u15 instead of 7u3).
I won't upload this
On Tue, Mar 5, 2013 at 11:46 AM, Matthias Klose wrote:
Am 01.03.2013 04:35, schrieb Moritz Mühlenhoff:
Backporting security fixes with Java has turned out to be more of less
unfeasible. I tried this once with DSA 2507 and I think that amounted to at
least
two man days of work for that update
I won't upload this myself. IcedTea 7-2.3 uses two hotspot versions, one for
the
zero ports, one for the hotspot runtimes. From my point of view it would be
good
to update to a 7-2.[45] with a unified hotspot version capable to build both
zero and hotspot, and keep the current 7-2.1.x for
Am 01.03.2013 04:35, schrieb Moritz Mühlenhoff:
Backporting security fixes with Java has turned out to be more of less
unfeasible. I tried this once with DSA 2507 and I think that amounted to at
least
two man days of work for that update alone. Also, Ubuntu has shipped
backports to all
Moritz Mühlenhoff:
I'm not familiar with the Java internals, but if we're following that approach
it would make sense to upgrade Wheezy to the version in experimental
(i.e. 7u15 instead of 7u3).
+1
(I am using the experimental version)
Cheers,
Andreas
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to
Op donderdag 28 februari 2013 21:35:09 schreef Moritz Mühlenhoff:
So we should proceed with providing backports for openjdk in the future.
If Matthias keeps the Debian/Ubuntu packaging in a state that it's easily
buildable on squeeze/wheezy for ojdk6 and for wheezy on ojdk7 I think
we should
Control: retitle -1 openjdk-6 should not be released with jessie
Control: tag -1 + wheezy-ignore
On Sun, Mar 3, 2013 at 14:08:44 +0100, Thijs Kinkhorst wrote:
Op donderdag 28 februari 2013 21:35:09 schreef Moritz Mühlenhoff:
So we should proceed with providing backports for openjdk in the
Niels Thykier ni...@thykier.net schrieb:
On 2013-02-17 23:04, Matthias Klose wrote:
There is a bug report open for openjdk-6 in wheezy (#675495) and squeeze
didn't
see any security updates for several months. To summarize, no party
involved is
capable or willing to provide security
On 18/02/2013 07:26, Andreas Kuckartz wrote:
Thanks a lot for explaining the situation and alternative paths forward.
My view as a user:
I only want OpenJDK7 (maybe OpenJDK8 when that becomes generally
available on September 9, 2013 :-)
Oracle has announced that no more new public
There is a bug report open for openjdk-6 in wheezy (#675495) and squeeze didn't
see any security updates for several months. To summarize, no party involved is
capable or willing to provide security updates based on backports of single
patches to the released openjdk-6 version in a stable
On 2013-02-17 23:04, Matthias Klose wrote:
There is a bug report open for openjdk-6 in wheezy (#675495) and squeeze
didn't
see any security updates for several months. To summarize, no party involved
is
capable or willing to provide security updates based on backports of single
patches to
Am 18.02.2013 00:08, schrieb Niels Thykier:
On 2013-02-17 23:04, Matthias Klose wrote:
- Remove openjdk-6 in wheezy. Probably would require falling back to
gcj. Not recommended as a runtime environment, but should work fine
for building packages, as ecj is used for byte-code
Hi!
Matthias Klose d...@ubuntu.com writes:
- Afaik openjdk-7 for kfreebsd does build on kfreebsd (according to Damien)
with the kfreebsd kernel from wheezy. So maybe some commitment could be
found to upgrade and maintain the kernels before wheezy is released?
Actually as far as I
Thanks a lot for explaining the situation and alternative paths forward.
My view as a user:
I only want OpenJDK7 (maybe OpenJDK8 when that becomes generally
available on September 9, 2013 :-)
Oracle has announced that no more new public updates of Java SE 6 will
be made available after February
Niels Thykier:
- Updating to openjdk-7 in wheezy would not solve any issues from my
point of view, and it would need some porting of packages to 7, and
probably removing some packages which are not yet ported.
Otoh removing openjdk-7 for wheezy could be an option if only one
On 2013-02-18 08:23, Andreas Kuckartz wrote:
Niels Thykier:
- Updating to openjdk-7 in wheezy would not solve any issues from my
point of view, and it would need some porting of packages to 7, and
probably removing some packages which are not yet ported.
Otoh removing openjdk-7 for
16 matches
Mail list logo
