Greetings,
Can someone please clarify what's going on here?
* On November 1, I uploaded petsc-2.3.0-1_i386.changes.
* On Sunday 11/6, Joerg Jaspert marked my upload rejected for
now, citing number of packages and naming convention as a
reason.
* I gave the
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Adam C Powell IV wrote:
Greetings,
Hi
Can someone please clarify what's going on here?
* On November 1, I uploaded petsc-2.3.0-1_i386.changes.
* On Sunday 11/6, Joerg Jaspert marked my upload rejected for
now, citing
On Mon, 2005-11-14 at 18:22 +0100, Luk Claes wrote:
Adam C Powell IV wrote:
Greetings,
Hi
Can someone please clarify what's going on here?
* On November 1, I uploaded petsc-2.3.0-1_i386.changes.
* On Sunday 11/6, Joerg Jaspert marked my upload rejected for
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Adam C Powell IV wrote:
On Mon, 2005-11-14 at 18:22 +0100, Luk Claes wrote:
Adam C Powell IV wrote:
Greetings,
Hi
[...]
What gives? Is this sufficient justification for rejecting a
lintian-clean package?
[...]
I think the REJECT-FAQ [1] will
Adam C Powell IV wrote:
As you could see in my message, I did ask Joerg again, but with no reply
for a week, so nobody but Joerg knows what I did or didn't convince him
of.
Well, I'm not Joerg, but based on the evidence of rejects/accepts and my
understanding of policy and actual practices, it
On 10473 March 1977, Adam C. Powell, IV wrote:
* On Sunday 11/6, Joerg Jaspert marked my upload rejected for
now, citing number of packages and naming convention as a
reason.
* I gave the reason for my naming convention and number of
packages.
* He
On Mon, 2005-11-14 at 21:32 +0100, Joerg Jaspert wrote:
On 10473 March 1977, Adam C. Powell, IV wrote:
* On Sunday 11/6, Joerg Jaspert marked my upload rejected for
now, citing number of packages and naming convention as a
reason.
* I gave the reason for my
On Mon, 2005-11-14 at 20:56 +0100, Thomas Viehmann wrote:
Adam C Powell IV wrote:
As you could see in my message, I did ask Joerg again, but with no reply
for a week, so nobody but Joerg knows what I did or didn't convince him
of.
Well, I'm not Joerg, but based on the evidence of
[redirecting this to -devel; discussions of ftp team NEW queue policies are
off-topic for -release.]
On Mon, Nov 14, 2005 at 05:13:47PM -0500, Adam C Powell IV wrote:
And thats what I asked for, yes. Drop the version from -dev|-dbg|-doc,
use the shlib system for the rest (which makes
9 matches
Mail list logo
