On 08/06/2010 04:04 PM, Marco d'Itri wrote:
It will also fix the symptoms of #586404.
debian-boot, I don't see any reply of you, yet?
Kind regards,
Philipp Kern
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact
On Sun, 2010-08-15 at 19:04 +0200, Philipp Kern wrote:
On 08/06/2010 04:04 PM, Marco d'Itri wrote:
It will also fix the symptoms of #586404.
debian-boot, I don't see any reply of you, yet?
otavio acked the unblocking of 160-1 on IRC, which migrated a few days
ago.
Regards,
Adam
--
It will also fix the symptoms of #586404.
--
ciao,
Marco
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: http://lists.debian.org/20100806140418.gb20...@bongo.bofh.it
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Marc 'HE' Brockschmidt [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Marco d'Itri) writes:
udev (0.125-7) unstable; urgency=medium
OK from my POV, needs ACK from the d-i RMs.
No objection
- --
O T A V I OS A L V A D O R
-
Otavio Salvador wrote:
Marc 'HE' Brockschmidt [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Marco d'Itri) writes:
udev (0.125-7) unstable; urgency=medium
OK from my POV, needs ACK from the d-i RMs.
No objection
unblocked
Cheers
Luk
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Marco d'Itri) writes:
udev (0.125-7) unstable; urgency=medium
OK from my POV, needs ACK from the d-i RMs.
Marc
--
BOFH #342:
HTTPD Error 4004 : very old Intel cpu - insufficient processing power
pgptjygw9ITfS.pgp
Description: PGP signature
udev (0.125-7) unstable; urgency=medium
* On s390, depend on s390-tools ( 1.6.2) which provides dasd_id.
(Closes: #489723)
* initramfs.hook: switch back to the old semantics of copy_exec to
support the etch version of initramfs-tools ( 0.88). (Closes: #498686)
*
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Marco d'Itri) writes:
udev (0.125-6) unstable; urgency=high
* Re-add support for scsi_id -s, this time for real. (Closes: #493075)
* Move in the udeb /lib/debian-installer-startup.d/S02udev to
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Marco d'Itri) writes:
udev (0.125-6) unstable; urgency=high
Unblocked.
Marc
--
BOFH #263:
It's stuck in the Web.
pgpvmuVNdquk6.pgp
Description: PGP signature
udev (0.125-6) unstable; urgency=high
* Re-add support for scsi_id -s, this time for real. (Closes: #493075)
* Move in the udeb /lib/debian-installer-startup.d/S02udev to
/lib/debian-installer/start-udev because udev will now be started
before the busybox init. Patch by Jérémy Bobbio.
* Marco d'Itri [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2008-09-04 14:21]:
* Move in the udeb /lib/debian-installer-startup.d/S02udev to
/lib/debian-installer/start-udev because udev will now be started
before the busybox init. Patch by Jérémy Bobbio. (Closes: #493865)
I'd assume this'll break beta2.
--
On Sep 04, Martin Michlmayr [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
* Marco d'Itri [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2008-09-04 14:21]:
* Move in the udeb /lib/debian-installer-startup.d/S02udev to
/lib/debian-installer/start-udev because udev will now be started
before the busybox init. Patch by Jérémy
On Mon, Aug 13, 2007 at 01:35:27PM +0200, Martin Zobel-Helas wrote:
debian-installer team, please ACK or NACK Marco's request.
ACK. Please unblock busybox-udeb at the same time:
unblock udev-udeb/0.114-2
unblock busybox-udeb/1:1.1.3-5
Cheers,
--
Jérémy Bobbio.''`.
On Mon, Aug 13, 2007 at 02:34:17PM +0200, Jérémy Bobbio wrote:
On Mon, Aug 13, 2007 at 01:35:27PM +0200, Martin Zobel-Helas wrote:
debian-installer team, please ACK or NACK Marco's request.
ACK. Please unblock busybox-udeb at the same time:
unblock udev-udeb/0.114-2
unblock
--
ciao,
Marco
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Fri, Oct 27, 2006 at 09:50:41AM +0200, Josselin Mouette wrote:
Le jeudi 26 octobre 2006 à 17:38 -0700, Steve Langasek a écrit :
On Thu, Oct 26, 2006 at 02:33:38PM +0200, Josselin Mouette wrote:
Unless this is an issue for d-i, could you please allow udev 0.100-2.1
in testing? The only
Le jeudi 26 octobre 2006 à 17:38 -0700, Steve Langasek a écrit :
On Thu, Oct 26, 2006 at 02:33:38PM +0200, Josselin Mouette wrote:
Unless this is an issue for d-i, could you please allow udev 0.100-2.1
in testing? The only change is a fix for #369479 which introduces
prompting with debconf.
Unless this is an issue for d-i, could you please allow udev 0.100-2.1
in testing? The only change is a fix for #369479 which introduces
prompting with debconf.
--
Josselin Mouette/\./\
Do you have any more insane proposals for me?
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Thu, Oct 26, 2006 at 02:33:38PM +0200, Josselin Mouette wrote:
Unless this is an issue for d-i, could you please allow udev 0.100-2.1
in testing? The only change is a fix for #369479 which introduces
prompting with debconf.
This package uses debconf for prompting in the preinst, but does
19 matches
Mail list logo