Package: release.debian.org
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: tools
Severity: wishlist
It would be useful to have a tool to manage the contents of the
removals file used by queue-viewer.
Possible functionality (mostly a braindump):
- given a bug number, check it is filed
Dropping the packages and bugs, they are not relevant to this discussion.
On Sun, Mar 17, 2013 at 05:49:26PM -0400, Michael Gilbert wrote:
On Sun, Mar 17, 2013 at 4:38 PM, Jonathan Wiltshire j...@debian.org wrote:
I do not like this pattern of unannounced removal requests without
consulting
On 25/12/08 21:38, Nico Golde wrote:
Hi,
* Simon Waltersimon.wal...@hp-factory.de [2008-12-25 00:43]:
Gabor FUNKfunk.ga...@hunetkft.hu writes:
[...]
Current state of this work is: It works (MailScanner starts and scans
a simple textmail) but it's not well tested. There
Hi,
* Simon Walter simon.wal...@hp-factory.de [2008-12-25 00:43]:
Gabor FUNK funk.ga...@hunetkft.hu writes:
[...]
Current state of this work is: It works (MailScanner starts and scans
a simple textmail) but it's not well tested. There still need to be
done some testing with TNEF attachment,
Julian Field mailscan...@ecs.soton.ac.uk writes:
On 25/12/08 21:38, Nico Golde wrote:
I'm afraid this is too late, mailscanner has already been
removed from lenny.
Shame you couldn't wait 6 days for the new stable release. I don't
immediately release a new stable release after making lots of
so here are three RC bugs with maintainers clearly indicating that they
don't want the buggy packages to release and none look like they will be
fixed. The package do not have reverse dependencies, so they seem to be
good for removal.
mailscanner #506353
The maintainer Simon Walter writes:
Hi,
* Gabor FUNK funk.ga...@hunetkft.hu [2008-12-24 12:14]:
http://www.mailscanner.info/ChangeLog
18/12/2008 New in Version 4.74.11-1
...
* Fixes *
2 Major work on removing symlink attack vulnerabilities affecting -autoupdate
lock files.
Note: This vulnerability only affected systems
Thomas Viehmann t...@beamnet.de writes:
xml2rfc #506652
The maintainer Florian Weimer:
This means we shouldn't release the current xml2rfc version with
lenny.
Removal hint added. Should a solution to this problem become available
soonish, the package should get back into lenny.
Hi
Gabor FUNK funk.ga...@hunetkft.hu writes:
mailscanner #506353
The maintainer Simon Walter writes:
In the current state the package should not be part of
the lenny release.
I'm in no position to fix all this. I'm not familiar enough with
the MailScanner sourcecode and I'm
Hi,
so here are three RC bugs with maintainers clearly indicating that they
don't want the buggy packages to release and none look like they will be
fixed. The package do not have reverse dependencies, so they seem to be
good for removal.
xml2rfc #506652
The maintainer Florian Weimer:
This
On Tue, Jan 02, 2007 at 07:27:43PM -0800, Steve Langasek wrote:
Hi. Please consider removing lukemftp from etch. It has been renamed
upstream to tnftp and is included in etch with the new name. I believe
lukemftp should actually be removed completely from Debian and replaced
with a
Hi. Please consider removing lukemftp from etch. It has been renamed
upstream to tnftp and is included in etch with the new name. I believe
lukemftp should actually be removed completely from Debian and replaced
with a transitional package to replace it with tnftp on systems that
currently have
Hi Noah,
On Tue, Jan 02, 2007 at 04:48:09PM -0500, Noah Meyerhans wrote:
Hi. Please consider removing lukemftp from etch. It has been renamed
upstream to tnftp and is included in etch with the new name. I believe
lukemftp should actually be removed completely from Debian and replaced
with
Hello,
should removal requests from ftp.debian.org repeated here to be sure
they will be removed from sarge or will the list on ftp.debian.org
worked on in the near future/before the freeze?
thx.
--
Noèl Köthe noel debian.org
Debian GNU/Linux, www.debian.org
signature.asc
Description: Dies
On Tue, Aug 10, 2004 at 07:09:37PM +0200, Noèl Köthe wrote:
should removal requests from ftp.debian.org repeated here to be sure
they will be removed from sarge or will the list on ftp.debian.org
worked on in the near future/before the freeze?
Please make sure that the ftp.debian.org bugs
On Tue, Aug 10, 2004 at 07:09:37PM +0200, Noèl Köthe wrote:
should removal requests from ftp.debian.org repeated here to be sure
they will be removed from sarge or will the list on ftp.debian.org
worked on in the near future/before the freeze?
As noted on IRC, if it's important that a package
16 matches
Mail list logo
