Re: short-term plans for libtiff

On Sun, May 27, 2012 at 11:31:23 -0400, Jay Berkenbilt wrote: I wonder whether I might be able to get some kind of response on my proposal to upload a tiff with libtiff5-alt-dev. To help you make a decision, I'm supplying the information you probably need. I'm hoping you'll be able to give

Re: short-term plans for libtiff

I wonder whether I might be able to get some kind of response on my proposal to upload a tiff with libtiff5-alt-dev. To help you make a decision, I'm supplying the information you probably need. I'm hoping you'll be able to give me a quick decision, or at least give me a quick response

short-term plans for libtiff

I'm planning on a new upload of tiff where all existing packages are unchanged and there's a new package called libtiff5-alt-dev. This package installed the tiff 4.x headers and libraries in a path that does not conflict with libtiff4-dev, and it installs the libtiff pkg-config files in the usual

Re: short-term plans for libtiff

Hi Jay, Jay Berkenbilt q...@debian.org (19/05/2012): Can you think of any reason that this could possibly cause any harm? I don't think it will since it won't have any impact at all on packages that don't explicitly build depend on libtiff5-alt-dev. I'm going to go ahead and do the upload.

Re: short-term plans for libtiff

Cyril Brulebois k...@debian.org wrote: Hi Jay, Jay Berkenbilt q...@debian.org (19/05/2012): Can you think of any reason that this could possibly cause any harm? I don't think it will since it won't have any impact at all on packages that don't explicitly build depend on libtiff5-alt-dev.