Hi,
On Monday 30 January 2006 18:31, Holger Levsen wrote:
> BTW, the fai maintainer said he will wait til this has been resolved before
> fixing #340609, #340608, #311524, #315080, #336650. (Which are serious (or
> should be) as they are against policy.)
FWIW those bugs are also present against F
block 340609 by 230217
block 340608 by 230217
block 311524 by 230217
block 315080 by 230217
block 336650 by 230217
thanks
Hi,
On Wednesday 21 December 2005 19:05, Adam D. Barratt wrote:
> On Wed, 2005-12-21 at 13:13 +0100, Holger Levsen wrote:
> [...]
>
> > Anyway, shall I file a bug against poli
On Wed, 2005-12-21 at 13:13 +0100, Holger Levsen wrote:
[...]
> Anyway, shall I file a bug against policy now, to include FHS 2.3 instead of
> 2.1 ? I think I should. Otherwise it would look to me like the release team
> can simply overwrite policy decissions.
Three such bugs already exist, one
Hello
On 2005-12-21 Holger Levsen wrote:
> On Monday 19 December 2005 12:05, Steve Langasek wrote:
> > On Mon, Dec 19, 2005 at 01:23:24AM +0100, Holger Levsen wrote:
> > > > is the release teams opinion and decission on this ? (Steve commented
> > > > on IRC that it would be good to have this deci
Hi,
On Monday 19 December 2005 12:05, Steve Langasek wrote:
> On Mon, Dec 19, 2005 at 01:23:24AM +0100, Holger Levsen wrote:
> > > is the release teams opinion and decission on this ? (Steve commented
> > > on IRC that it would be good to have this decission made by the team
> > > and in an archiv
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Stephen Gran <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> This one time, at band camp, Holger Levsen said:
>> > So my question is simply: should packages begin using /srv now ? What is
>> > the release teams opinion and decission on thi
ationale: This main purpose of specifying this is so that
> > users may find the location of the data files for particular service, and
> > so that services which require a single tree for readonly data, writable
> > data and scripts (such as cgi scripts) can be reasonably placed.
On Monday, 19 December 2005 01:50, Stephen Gran wrote:
> This one time, at band camp, Holger Levsen said:
> > > So my question is simply: should packages begin using /srv now ? What
> > > is the release teams opinion and decission on this ? (Steve commented
> > > o
This one time, at band camp, Holger Levsen said:
> > So my question is simply: should packages begin using /srv now ? What is
> > the release teams opinion and decission on this ? (Steve commented on IRC
> > that it would be good to have this decission made by the team and in an
for particular service, and
> so that services which require a single tree for readonly data, writable
> data and scripts (such as cgi scripts) can be reasonably placed. [...]"
>
>
> So my question is simply: should packages begin using /srv now ? What is
> the release teams op
a and
scripts (such as cgi scripts) can be reasonably placed. [...]"
So my question is simply: should packages begin using /srv now ? What is the
release teams opinion and decission on this ? (Steve commented on IRC that it
would be good to have this decission made by the team and in an ar
11 matches
Mail list logo
