On Sun, Sep 05, 2004 at 03:10:49PM -0700, Steve Langasek wrote:
On Sun, Sep 05, 2004 at 08:01:13PM +0200, Guido Guenther wrote:
[..snip..]
If not, have they been tested with the modutils from woody?
At least 2.4.22 works with the modutils from woody (haven't checked a
newer version yet).
It's come to my attention that on mips(el), the glibc in sarge is
incompatible with the kernel in woody, and the kernel in sarge is
incompatible with the glibc in woody. This is an impasse that has to be
resolved for sarge's release, so that upgrades from woody to sarge can
be supported.
The
Hi,
On Fri, Sep 03, 2004 at 10:42:12PM -0700, Steve Langasek wrote:
It's come to my attention that on mips(el), the glibc in sarge is
incompatible with the kernel in woody, and the kernel in sarge is
incompatible with the glibc in woody. This is an impasse that has to be
resolved for sarge's
On Sat, Sep 04, 2004 at 11:54:38AM +0200, Guido Guenther wrote:
On Fri, Sep 03, 2004 at 10:42:12PM -0700, Steve Langasek wrote:
It's come to my attention that on mips(el), the glibc in sarge is
incompatible with the kernel in woody, and the kernel in sarge is
incompatible with the glibc in
On Sat, Sep 04, 2004 at 01:16:10PM +0100, Colin Watson wrote:
On Sat, Sep 04, 2004 at 11:54:38AM +0200, Guido Guenther wrote:
On Fri, Sep 03, 2004 at 10:42:12PM -0700, Steve Langasek wrote:
It's come to my attention that on mips(el), the glibc in sarge is
incompatible with the kernel in
On Sat, Sep 04, 2004 at 08:10:34PM +0200, Guido Guenther wrote:
On Sat, Sep 04, 2004 at 01:16:10PM +0100, Colin Watson wrote:
On Sat, Sep 04, 2004 at 11:54:38AM +0200, Guido Guenther wrote:
On Fri, Sep 03, 2004 at 10:42:12PM -0700, Steve Langasek wrote:
It's come to my attention that on
6 matches
Mail list logo