folks,
i was pleasantly surprised by the freeze announcement, but i think
we are moving just a tad too fast now. from what i gathered, the
final freeze is set of august 15. many people are in vacation
between now and then, and thus i think it may be better to add
another two weeks.
for instance,
On Tue, Aug 03, 2004 at 02:36:56AM +0200, Jeroen van Wolffelaar wrote:
The bug was originally filed on another package, hence the weird version
number. Because of that, I'm not 100% sure the bug is also present in
the version currently in sarge, but since other imagemagick bugs on the
list
On Mon, Aug 02, 2004 at 11:51:17PM +0200, Wouter Verhelst wrote:
On Mon, Aug 02, 2004 at 06:25:20PM +0100, Paul Martin wrote:
On Mon, Aug 02, 2004 at 01:43:00PM +0200, Jeroen van Wolffelaar wrote:
gcc-3.0 isn't available in sid/sarge on m68k. Suppose that your package
FTBFS's on m68k in
On 2004-08-03 Wouter Verhelst [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Mon, Aug 02, 2004 at 11:51:17PM +0200, Wouter Verhelst wrote:
[...]
I'm preparing to perform a build with gcc-3.4 on another m68k host,
running unstable; I'll follow up with the results ASAP.
Hm. It didn't build, but that's probably
On Tue, Aug 03, 2004 at 09:58:57AM +0200, Andreas Metzler wrote:
On 2004-08-03 Wouter Verhelst [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Mon, Aug 02, 2004 at 11:51:17PM +0200, Wouter Verhelst wrote:
[...]
I'm preparing to perform a build with gcc-3.4 on another m68k host,
running unstable; I'll
On Tue, Aug 03, 2004 at 10:25:17AM +0200, Wouter Verhelst wrote:
On Tue, Aug 03, 2004 at 09:58:57AM +0200, Andreas Metzler wrote:
On 2004-08-03 Wouter Verhelst [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Mon, Aug 02, 2004 at 11:51:17PM +0200, Wouter Verhelst wrote:
[...]
I'm preparing to perform a
* Joel Baker [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2004-08-02 15:08]:
If gcc-3.4 requires binutils (= 2.15) the dependencies need an update.
you didn't give any reason. downgrading.
According to this bug gcc-3.4_3.4.1-5 uses the --as-needed option of
ld which is new in 2.15-1. If this is true, then not having
On Tue, Aug 03, 2004 at 09:40:43AM +0200, Daniel Kobras wrote:
On Tue, Aug 03, 2004 at 02:36:56AM +0200, Jeroen van Wolffelaar wrote:
The bug was originally filed on another package, hence the weird version
number. Because of that, I'm not 100% sure the bug is also present in
the version
On lun, 2004-08-02 at 18:28 -0400, Joey Hess wrote:
I see that gnome-session is still stuck at version 2.6.1-5 in testing.
That old version has bug #250970 which makes gdm launch kde by default
on new debian installs. It's probably already too late to fix this for
the next debian-installer
Martin Michlmayr wrote:
* Joel Baker [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2004-08-02 15:08]:
If gcc-3.4 requires binutils (= 2.15) the dependencies need an update.
you didn't give any reason. downgrading.
According to this bug gcc-3.4_3.4.1-5 uses the --as-needed option of
ld which is new in 2.15-1. If
Hi.
Another question about a removal from testing:
sim
longstanding RC bug, I couldn't fix it despite trying real hard
(very akward autotools setup AFAICT), no reaction from
maintainer. kde-extras would need to drop the recommends on it, but
since kde-extras is only a meta package with easy
On Tue, Aug 03, 2004 at 10:46:30AM +0100, Paul Martin wrote:
On Tue, Aug 03, 2004 at 09:50:03AM +0200, Wouter Verhelst wrote:
Hm. It didn't build, but that's probably because it doesn't use whatever
I specify as CC:
cc -Wall -D_GNU_SOURCE -DLinux -DVERSION=\3.7\ -Wall -g -O2
On 30 de jul de 2004, at 22:54, Steve Langasek wrote:
On Fri, Jul 30, 2004 at 12:41:07PM +0200, Frank Lichtenheld wrote:
On Thu, Jul 29, 2004 at 07:23:19PM -0700, Steve Langasek wrote:
On Thu, Jul 29, 2004 at 03:48:19PM +0200, Bruno David Rodrigues
wrote:
Imagemagick 5.x dissapeared from
Hello folks,
I'm very new at this (this is the first time I've tried to help out with
RC bugs), so please let me know if what I've done here is useful, and
please let me know how I can make it more useful. I am not (yet) a Debian
developer, so I can't upload NMUs, but I'm trying to make it as
Please remove minit from sarge.
Packaging is experimental, it is quite hard to set up, and i havn't
recieved any feedback for this package yet. It might not work at all...
And since minit (compiled statically with dietlibc) doesn't have any
dependency it is trivial to install from unstable even on
On Wed, Aug 04, 2004 at 12:50:01AM +0200, Erich Schubert wrote:
Please remove minit from sarge.
Packaging is experimental, it is quite hard to set up, and i havn't
recieved any feedback for this package yet. It might not work at all...
And since minit (compiled statically with dietlibc)
severity 262012 serious
thanks
gnome-media made it into testing. Thanks for letting us cheat. :)
The bug will be fixed shortly (read tomorrow, probably), but will take a
while to get into testing due to the tiff transition.
Please, add this bug to the list of packages not fixed in testing.
On Tue, Aug 03, 2004 at 12:07:36PM -0700, Russ Allbery wrote:
I'm very new at this (this is the first time I've tried to help out with
RC bugs), so please let me know if what I've done here is useful, and
please let me know how I can make it more useful. I am not (yet) a Debian
developer, so
Frank Lichtenheld [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
You're doing great AFAICT.
Excellent. Then I will keep going. :) I have another message I'm
getting ready to send out (I'm up to x on the list).
#256093 interchange: bug in package logic requiring prerm workaround
this sounds klunky, leaving
Here's the other part of the alphabet. As before, any suggestions for how
better to do this or the pointing out of any mistakes I've made would be
very appreciated.
I don't believe the following bugs are RC:
#260779 libruby1.8
The new version of Ruby has made it into sarge, so the sarge
Hi Russ,
On Tue, Aug 03, 2004 at 12:07:36PM -0700, Russ Allbery wrote:
I don't believe the following bugs are RC:
#255582 gpdf
I was unable to reproduce this bug in testing, and from the reports it
sounded like it should be easily reproducible. Perhaps it has since
cleared up
21 matches
Mail list logo
