Hi Adam,
On Mon, Sep 12, 2011 at 07:33:47PM +0100, Adam D. Barratt wrote [edited]:
On Sun, 2011-09-11 at 22:22 +0200, Serafeim Zanikolas wrote:
update-inetd parses successfully the /proc/pid/stat file of inetd only when
the latter comes from the default Provides: inet-superserver package
Hi,
There have been no furhter folluwups on the ca-certificates version
number reuse thread for a while now. My conclusion is that we need to
prepare an upload targeted at stable to ensure the change is also included
in the point release, on cd's etc.
I've attached my proposed change. Please
On Sat, Aug 27, 2011 at 02:55:50PM +0200, Philipp Kern wrote:
On Mon, Jun 06, 2011 at 12:59:09PM +0100, Dominic Hargreaves wrote:
+1 for this patch to be applied in stable. Apart from the inconvenience
of being emailed by all your Debian systems using mdadm once a month,
sending people an
On Tuesday 13 September 2011 04:37:56 Thijs Kinkhorst wrote:
There have been no furhter folluwups on the ca-certificates version
number reuse thread for a while now. My conclusion is that we need to
prepare an upload targeted at stable to ensure the change is also included
in the point
On 13.09.2011 19:01, Dominic Hargreaves wrote:
[]
This is still unfixed in sid, though.
Indeed so.
In any case, since I have rolled this out on some servers I manage,
I thought I may as well confirm that a patch (attached) adopted from
On Sun, 2011-09-11 at 23:59 +0100, Ben Hutchings wrote:
On Wed, 2011-09-07 at 21:30 +0200, Philipp Kern wrote:
For Squeeze it would be cool to have the kernel in for testing end of
next week (16/17th). The d-i upload should be there the middle of week
39, October 1st at the latest.
[...]
Processing changes file: linux-2.6_2.6.32-35squeeze1_i386.changes
ACCEPT
Processing changes file: linux-2.6_2.6.32-35squeeze1_amd64.changes
ACCEPT
Processing changes file: linux-2.6_2.6.32-35squeeze1_armel.changes
ACCEPT
Processing changes file: linux-2.6_2.6.32-35squeeze1_ia64.changes
On 2011-09-11 20:56, Adam D. Barratt wrote:
On Sat, 2011-09-10 at 15:00 +0200, Niels Thykier wrote:
Sorry for the delay. I have attached the complete debdiff from 2.4.3 to
now including the extra issue and the debian/source/options magic to
make dpkg-source keep those files (mentioned above).
Hi,
I would like to propose a release goal of enabling hardening build flags[1]
for all C/C++ packages in the archive[2]. For Wheezy, specific sub-goals are
being chosen.
The default flags are almost settled[3], additional subgoals may come
up[4], and more work is needed to identify the specific
On Tue, 13 Sep 2011 15:38:29 -0700 Kees Cook wrote:
Hi,
I would like to propose a release goal of enabling hardening build flags[1]
for all C/C++ packages in the archive[2].
I think all C/C++ packages is an impossibility in the wheezy
timeframe, and we should be honest about that.
On Tue, 13 Sep 2011 15:38:29 -0700 Kees Cook wrote:
[1] http://wiki.debian.org/Hardening
It looks like we're duplicating wiki work. The page I created
yesterday is much more comprehensive and detailed right now:
http://wiki.debian.org/ReleaseGoals/SecurityHardeningBuildFlags
Best wishes,
Mike
Processing changes file: mantis_1.1.6+dfsg-2lenny6_i386.changes
ACCEPT
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: http://lists.debian.org/e1r3ej5-0002mq...@franck.debian.org
Hi,
On Tue, Sep 13, 2011 at 07:24:10PM -0400, Michael Gilbert wrote:
On Tue, 13 Sep 2011 15:38:29 -0700 Kees Cook wrote:
[1] http://wiki.debian.org/Hardening
You mean http://wiki.debian.org/ReleaseGoals/Hardening ?
It looks like we're duplicating wiki work. The page I created
yesterday is
On Tue, Sep 13, 2011 at 07:01:13PM -0400, Michael Gilbert wrote:
On Tue, 13 Sep 2011 15:38:29 -0700 Kees Cook wrote:
I would like to propose a release goal of enabling hardening build flags[1]
for all C/C++ packages in the archive[2].
I think all C/C++ packages is an impossibility in the
14 matches
Mail list logo
