Your message dated Sat, 4 Aug 2012 08:30:38 +0200
with message-id 20120804063038.gi17...@radis.cristau.org
and subject line Re: Bug#682300: unblock: hunspell-en-us/20070829-6 and
openoffice.org-dictionaries/1:3.3.0~rc10-4
has caused the Debian Bug report #682300,
regarding unblock:
On Sat, Aug 4, 2012 at 04:34:01 +0200, Marco d'Itri wrote:
diff -urNp whois-5.0.17/debian/changelog whois-5.0.18/debian/changelog
--- whois-5.0.17/debian/changelog 2012-06-25 03:36:11.0 +0200
+++ whois-5.0.18/debian/changelog 2012-07-22 20:36:48.279334628 +0200
@@ -1,3 +1,11
Quoting Daniel Baumann (daniel.baum...@progress-technologies.net):
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: unblock
1:2012.1.15AR.5-3 would have migrated if there was no udeb block,
1:2012.1.15AR.5-4 contains l10n updates.
On Sat, Aug 4, 2012 at 08:39:29 +0200, Christian PERRIER wrote:
Quoting Daniel Baumann (daniel.baum...@progress-technologies.net):
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: unblock
1:2012.1.15AR.5-3 would have migrated if
On Mon, Jul 30, 2012 at 13:19:57 +0800, Thomas Goirand wrote:
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: unblock
Dear Release Team,
The new Keystone package, currently available in SID, contains
reviewed Debconf templates and
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
retitle 683243 unblock: keystone/2012.1.1-3
Bug #683243 [release.debian.org] unblock: keystone/2012.1.1-2
Changed Bug title to 'unblock: keystone/2012.1.1-3' from 'unblock:
keystone/2012.1.1-2'
thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me
Coin,
Quoting Mathieu Parent math.par...@gmail.com:
(cc-ing pkg-horde hackers)
(why did you put this thread on -release?
This problem is affecting the release, so i think the RT needs to be
aware of it, even if it is just informational. I also slightly hoped
finishing the work would have
tags 683247 -moreinfo
retitle 683247 unblock libav_6:0.8.3-6
stop
On Mon, Jul 30, 2012 at 2:17 PM, Adam D. Barratt
a...@adam-barratt.org.uk wrote:
On 30.07.2012 08:08, Reinhard Tartler wrote:
I intend to work on a new upload that incorporates your suggestions
for clarifying the
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
tags 683247 -moreinfo
Bug #683247 [release.debian.org] unblock libav
Removed tag(s) moreinfo.
retitle 683247 unblock libav_6:0.8.3-6
Bug #683247 [release.debian.org] unblock libav
Changed Bug title to 'unblock libav_6:0.8.3-6' from 'unblock
On Fri, 2012-08-03 at 17:35 -0700, Kees Cook wrote:
Please unblock package libseccomp
libseccomp just released their 1.0.0 version which has ABI changes over the
earlier 0.1.0 release.
For the record: the new package is therefore currently in NEW.
Regards,
Adam
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email
Your message dated Sat, 4 Aug 2012 12:24:05 +0200
with message-id 20120804102405.go17...@radis.cristau.org
and subject line Bug#683247: unblock libav/6:0.8.3-6
has caused the Debian Bug report #683247,
regarding unblock libav_6:0.8.3-6
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the
Your message dated Sat, 4 Aug 2012 12:48:50 +0200
with message-id 20120804104850.gp17...@radis.cristau.org
and subject line Re: Bug#681969: unblock: xorg-server/2:1.12.3-1
has caused the Debian Bug report #681969,
regarding unblock: xorg-server/2:1.12.3-1
to be marked as done.
This means that you
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
severity 683073 normal
Bug #683073 [release.debian.org] unblock: gnunet/0.9.3-3
Severity set to 'normal' from 'grave'
thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
--
683073:
Your message dated Sat, 4 Aug 2012 12:59:27 +0200
with message-id 20120804105927.gq17...@radis.cristau.org
and subject line Re: Bug#681521: unblock: brewtarget/1.2.4+dfsg-1.1
has caused the Debian Bug report #681521,
regarding unblock: brewtarget/1.2.4+dfsg-1.1
to be marked as done.
This means
Hi Ben,
Ben Hutchings b...@decadent.org.uk (03/08/2012):
Byte queue limits (BQL) are an important step in reducing 'bufferbloat'
and network latency on Linux. The feature was introduced in Linux 3.3
and has had a few bug fixes since then; I think it can be considered
stable now. It requires
On Sat, Aug 4, 2012 at 13:53:17 +0200, Cyril Brulebois wrote:
Now that d-i wheezy beta1 is finally out, I'll try and figure out what
exactly breaks in d-i when the linux kernelgets its ABI bumped. Apparently
netboot and mini.iso are concerned, but it would be nice to have that
checked, and
Petr Salinger petr.salin...@seznam.cz (03/08/2012):
Just keeping you posted. The change looks reasonable, but the
package needs a separate ACK from the d-i team. Last I heard from
them, they requested that we hold all udebs for now.
It is a little problematic. The udeb is created only
On Thu, Aug 2, 2012 at 03:19:35 +0100, Martín Ferrari wrote:
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: unblock
Please unblock package getlive
I was planning to upload the latest upstream release in June, when I detected
that
Your message dated Sat, 4 Aug 2012 14:45:55 +0200
with message-id 20120804124555.gu17...@radis.cristau.org
and subject line Re: Bug#682448: unblock: exactimage/0.8.5-5
has caused the Debian Bug report #682448,
regarding unblock: exactimage/0.8.5-5
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim
On Fri, Aug 3, 2012 at 12:36:07 +0200, Ralf Treinen wrote:
On Wed, Aug 01, 2012 at 09:51:00PM +0100, Adam D. Barratt wrote:
--- worldwind-0.5.0.orig/wms-release.zip.cdbs-config_list
+++ worldwind-0.5.0/wms-release.zip.cdbs-config_list
@@ -0,0 +1 @@
+ 2148 2008-05-02
Hi,
On Sat, Aug 4, 2012 at 1:36 PM, Julien Cristau jcris...@debian.org wrote:
unblock getlive/2.4+cvs20120801-1
I'm not too comfortable with this. There was no upload for two years,
the package is broken in stable AIUI, and it sounds like it's going to
keep getting broken in wheezy as well
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: unblock
Please unblock package ruby-actionpack-3.2
This version add a single patch that fixes a secutiry problem
(CVE-2012-3424, #683370), and just uploaded to unstable. You will find a
debdiff
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: unblock
Please unblock package amule
It fixes a crash when statistics.dat file is empty; #683680
unblock amule/2.3.1-9
-- System Information:
Debian Release: wheezy/sid
APT prefers unstable
On Mon, Jul 30, 2012 at 18:31:39 +0200, Raúl Sánchez Siles wrote:
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: unblock
Please unblock package kvirc
This is a resend/summary of [0] according to [1].
kvirc
Your message dated Sat, 04 Aug 2012 14:18:58 +0100
with message-id 1344086338.21252.3.ca...@jacala.jungle.funky-badger.org
and subject line Re: Bug#683822: unblock: amule/2.3.1-9
has caused the Debian Bug report #683822,
regarding unblock: amule/2.3.1-9
to be marked as done.
This means that you
Your message dated Sat, 04 Aug 2012 14:20:04 +0100
with message-id 1344086404.21252.4.ca...@jacala.jungle.funky-badger.org
and subject line Re: Bug#683820: unblock: ruby-actionpack-3.2/3.2.6-3
has caused the Debian Bug report #683820,
regarding unblock: ruby-actionpack-3.2/3.2.6-3
to be marked as
On Wed, 2012-08-01 at 20:16 +, Daniel Pocock wrote:
On 27/07/12 18:11, Adam D. Barratt wrote:
Sorry for not getting back to you yet. We're still wading through
requests, and those which aren't an obvious quick yes/no often take a
little while longer to deal with.
Would it help if an
Control: tags -1 + squeeze confirmed
On Fri, 2012-08-03 at 00:10 +0200, gregor herrmann wrote:
On Thu, 02 Aug 2012 18:47:34 +0100, Adam D. Barratt wrote:
This is about #671255: CVE-2012-2451: CWE-377 Insecure Temporary
File. Seems we all have forgot about the update in wheezy :)
I
Processing control commands:
tags -1 + squeeze confirmed
Bug #683652 [release.debian.org] pu: package libconfig-inifiles-perl/2.52-1
Added tag(s) squeeze and confirmed.
--
683652: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=683652
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org
Ansgar Burchardt ans...@debian.org writes:
My suggestion is to now switch the default compression for GNOME and KDE
packages to xz using gnome-pkg-tools (pkg-kde-tools) and then either
schedule binNMUs (only arch:any packages) or no-changes uploads (for
arch:all or Multi-Arch). I would help
On Sat, 04 Aug 2012 14:32:33 +0100, Adam D. Barratt wrote:
For completeness, could we have the final proposed debdiff in this bug
please?
Sure, attached.
Thanks. Please go ahead.
Thank you! Uploaded.
Cheers,
gregor
--
.''`. Homepage: http://info.comodo.priv.at/ - OpenPGP key
On Sat, Aug 04, 2012 at 12:37:23AM +0200, Tobias Hansen wrote:
Hi,
t1lib has no upstream, but a number of security vulnerabilities and reverse
dependencies.
We need to know if #637488 can be ignored for wheezy or if we should go for
removal and file bugs against the reverse
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
block 637040 with 638756 638763 638761 638760 638759
Bug #637040 [release.debian.org] RM: t1lib/5.1.2-3
637040 was not blocked by any bugs.
637040 was not blocking any bugs.
Added blocking bug(s) of 637040: 638760, 638756, 638763, 638759, and
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: unblock
Please unblock package aplus-fsf
The dependency on xemacs21-nomule was blocking it; I removed that dependency.
The full set of binary packages is: aplus-fsf, aplus-fsf-doc, aplus-fsf-el,
Hi, d-r.
Several packages built from aplus-fsf source (aplus-fsf, aplus-fsf-doc,
aplus-fsf-el, aplus-fsf-dev, xfronts-kapl) were removed from TESTING
because there was a dependency on xemacs21-nomule, which in turn was
removed from TESTING because of bug 670292. Most of aplus-fsf does not
On Fri, 2012-08-03 at 10:28 +0200, Sebastian Harl wrote:
Please unblock package rrdtool
The current version in unstable (1.4.7-2) fixes an RC bug (#664724)
causing RRDCacheD (the RRDtool Caching Daemon) to segfault on startup if
the daemon's data directory does not exist. This bug had been
Control: tags -1 + moreinfo
On Wed, 2012-08-01 at 10:19 +0800, Thomas Goirand wrote:
Please unblock package xen-api
The current version in Wheezy suffers from a wrong default PAM setting of
PAM, giving access to XAPI to any account on th server, as per:
Processing control commands:
tags -1 + moreinfo
Bug #683472 [release.debian.org] unblock: xen-api/1.3.2-10
Added tag(s) moreinfo.
--
683472: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=683472
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email
[Neil Roeth]
diff -u aplus-fsf-4.22.1/config/config.sub aplus-fsf-4.22.1/config/config.sub
--- aplus-fsf-4.22.1/config/config.sub
+++ aplus-fsf-4.22.1/config/config.sub
@@ -4,7 +4,7 @@
# 2000, 2001, 2002, 2003, 2004, 2005, 2006, 2007, 2008, 2009, 2010,
# 2011, 2012 Free Software
El Sábado, 4 de agosto de 2012, Julien Cristau escribió:
On Mon, Jul 30, 2012 at 18:31:39 +0200, Raúl Sánchez Siles wrote:
[...]
Care to send a non-reversed debdiff? That makes it kinda painful to
read.
Oops! Sorry. Find it attached now.
Cheers,
Julien
Regards,
--
Raúl
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: unblock
Please unblock package ruby-rails-2.3
Version 2.3.14-4 fixes one RC bug, and was just uploaded to unstable.
The debdiff between the version in testing (2.3.14-3) and this one is
attached.
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: unblock
Control: block -1 by 683844
Dear release team,
Please
unblock sgml-base/1.26+nmu4
The version intends to fix all remaining RC bugs of sgml-base:
#678902: sgml-base needs to Pre-Depend
Processing control commands:
block -1 by 683844
Bug #683847 [release.debian.org] unblock: sgml-base/1.26+nmu4
683847 was not blocked by any bugs.
683847 was not blocking any bugs.
Added blocking bug(s) of 683847: 683844
--
683847: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=683847
Debian
Dear release team,
On Sat, Jul 21, 2012 at 08:17:19PM +0200, Andreas Beckmann wrote:
1) #681194
Symptom: For any package using dh_installcatalogs if you
install, remove, upgrade from squeeze to wheezy and then install
that package, you can see a useless conffile prompt.
Your message dated Sat, 04 Aug 2012 20:02:17 +0100
with message-id 1344106937.21252.18.ca...@jacala.jungle.funky-badger.org
and subject line Re: Bug#683843: unblock: ruby-rails-2.3/2.3.14-4
has caused the Debian Bug report #683843,
regarding unblock: ruby-rails-2.3/2.3.14-4
to be marked as done.
Processing changes file: isc-dhcp_4.1.1-P1-15+squeeze6_amd64.changes
ACCEPT
Processing changes file: isc-dhcp_4.1.1-P1-15+squeeze6_armel.changes
ACCEPT
Processing changes file: isc-dhcp_4.1.1-P1-15+squeeze6_i386.changes
ACCEPT
Processing changes file:
Hello,
here's a prospective timeline for d-i wheezy beta 2: 3 weeks for
development and bug fixes, 1 week for dealing with udeb-related unblock
requests, building/testing images and preparing release announcement.
The deadline should be pretty clear, and should let time for doc /
translation
Control: tags -1 + pending
On Sat, 2012-08-04 at 16:01 +0200, gregor herrmann wrote:
On Sat, 04 Aug 2012 14:32:33 +0100, Adam D. Barratt wrote:
For completeness, could we have the final proposed debdiff in this bug
please?
Sure, attached.
Thanks. Please go ahead.
Thank you!
Processing control commands:
tags -1 + pending
Bug #683652 [release.debian.org] pu: package libconfig-inifiles-perl/2.52-1
Added tag(s) pending.
--
683652: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=683652
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
--
To
Processing changes file: libconfig-inifiles-perl_2.52-1+squeeze1_amd64.changes
ACCEPT
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive:
On Sat, 2012-08-04 at 14:06 +0200, Julien Cristau wrote:
On Sat, Aug 4, 2012 at 13:53:17 +0200, Cyril Brulebois wrote:
Now that d-i wheezy beta1 is finally out, I'll try and figure out what
exactly breaks in d-i when the linux kernelgets its ABI bumped. Apparently
netboot and mini.iso
Your message dated Sat, 4 Aug 2012 23:08:27 +0200
with message-id 20120804210827.GA29819@elende
and subject line Re: Bug#683334: unblock: libcrypt-ssleay-perl/0.58-2
(pre-approval request)
has caused the Debian Bug report #683334,
regarding unblock: libcrypt-ssleay-perl/0.58-2 (pre-approval
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: unblock
Please unblock package ruby-ffi
version -3.1 got into testing because a problem in the toolchain made so
that the tests were not run during the build, even thoug they failed in
armhf
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: unblock
Hi,
Please unblock package telepathy-glib
This version fixes a race condition that prevents GTalk contacts to be
displayed in empathy in some situation and also fix the ability to set
the
On 08/04/2012 01:15 PM, Peter Samuelson wrote:
[Neil Roeth]
diff -u aplus-fsf-4.22.1/config/config.sub aplus-fsf-4.22.1/config/config.sub
--- aplus-fsf-4.22.1/config/config.sub
+++ aplus-fsf-4.22.1/config/config.sub
@@ -4,7 +4,7 @@
# 2000, 2001, 2002, 2003, 2004, 2005, 2006, 2007, 2008,
On 08/04/2012 11:52 PM, Adam D. Barratt wrote:
Control: tags -1 + moreinfo
On Wed, 2012-08-01 at 10:19 +0800, Thomas Goirand wrote:
Please unblock package xen-api
The current version in Wheezy suffers from a wrong default PAM setting of
PAM, giving access to XAPI to any account on th
56 matches
Mail list logo
