Bug#806247: jessie-pu: package dbconfig-common/1.8.47+nmu3

On Wed, 25 Nov 2015 21:02:11 +0100 Paul Gevers wrote: > I will start to work on a proper debdiff, but I appreciate it to know if I > should include the fixing of existing files in it. Due to lack of a response, which I expect is due to the lack of a debdiff, I went ahead and

Bug#805634: jessie-pu: torbrowser-launcher/0.2.2-2~deb8u1

On 04/12/15 12:05, Holger Levsen wrote: > Dear stable release managers, > > as described in this bug, torbrowser-launcher in jessie is completly broken > at > the moment. A reply from you about this request would have been very nice > (even given intrigeri's reply), and even if it would have

Bug#805634: [Pkg-privacy-maintainers] Bug#805634: jessie-pu: torbrowser-launcher/0.2.2-2~deb8u1

On Fri, 2015-12-04 at 13:42 +0200, Holger Levsen wrote: > Hi, > > On Freitag, 4. Dezember 2015, Emilio Pozuelo Monfort wrote: > > Hmm? Is there going to be a point release next week and I completely missed > > the announcement? > > a release team member (who is not a SRM) told me yesterday that

Bug#807002: marked as done (nmu: golang-golang-x-net-dev_0.0+git20151007.b846920+dfsg-1)

Your message dated Fri, 4 Dec 2015 12:04:46 +0100 with message-id <5661734e.9050...@debian.org> and subject line Re: Bug#807002: nmu: golang-golang-x-net-dev_0.0+git20151007.b846920+dfsg-1 has caused the Debian Bug report #807002, regarding nmu:

Bug#805634: jessie-pu: torbrowser-launcher/0.2.2-2~deb8u1

Dear stable release managers, as described in this bug, torbrowser-launcher in jessie is completly broken at the moment. A reply from you about this request would have been very nice (even given intrigeri's reply), and even if it would have been "Holger, you should know we don't like new

Bug#805634: [Pkg-privacy-maintainers] Bug#805634: jessie-pu: torbrowser-launcher/0.2.2-2~deb8u1

Hi, On Freitag, 4. Dezember 2015, Emilio Pozuelo Monfort wrote: > Hmm? Is there going to be a point release next week and I completely missed > the announcement? a release team member (who is not a SRM) told me yesterday that it might be too late to be included in the next point release very

Processed: jessie-pu: package mkvmlinuz/37+deb8u1

Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > block 741642 by 793556 Bug #741642 {Done: Milan Kupcevic } [mkvmlinuz] /etc/kernel/postinst.d/mkvmlinuz exited with return code 20 Bug #791868 {Done: Milan Kupcevic } [mkvmlinuz]

Processed: Re: Bug#784944: jessie-pu: package redmine/3.0~20140825-8~deb8u1 (was 3.0~20140825-7~deb8u1)

Processing control commands: > tags -1 + confirmed Bug #784944 [release.debian.org] jessie-pu: package redmine/3.0~20140825-7~deb8u1 Added tag(s) confirmed. -- 784944: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=784944 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems

Bug#784944: jessie-pu: package redmine/3.0~20140825-8~deb8u1 (was 3.0~20140825-7~deb8u1)

Control: tags -1 + confirmed On Fri, 2015-12-04 at 12:10 -0200, Antonio Terceiro wrote: [...] > > > > This release fixes several bugs related to upgrades from wheezy. The > > > > equivalent version is already in testing. I have tested it extensively, > > > > and received positive feedback from

Processed: block 796345 with 807038

Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > block 796345 with 807038 Bug #796345 [release.debian.org] transition: perl 5.22 796345 was blocked by: 796923 799118 790532 787493 788073 787468 802939 787450 787453 796345 was blocking: 798309 801659 801660 801661 801662 801663 Added blocking

Bug#784944: jessie-pu: package redmine/3.0~20140825-8~deb8u1 (was 3.0~20140825-7~deb8u1)

Hello, On Thu, Aug 13, 2015 at 02:05:08PM -0300, Antonio Terceiro wrote: > Hello, > > On Fri, Jul 03, 2015 at 09:41:22AM -0300, Antonio Terceiro wrote: > > Hello, > > > > On Sun, May 10, 2015 at 08:02:55PM -0300, Antonio Terceiro wrote: > > > Package: release.debian.org > > > Severity: normal >

Bug#807002: nmu: golang-golang-x-net-dev_0.0+git20151007.b846920+dfsg-1

On 4 December 2015 at 03:04, Emilio Pozuelo Monfort wrote: > Besides, that is not going to work. A binNMU would give you > > golang-golang-x-net-dev 0.0+git20151007.b846920+dfsg-1+b1 > > But golang-go.crypto is building: > > golang-golang-x-net-dev 1:0.0~git20151201.0.7b85b09-1

8.3 planning

Hi, We're a tad overdue for the 8.3 point release and with the holiday period coming up, getting one done in December looks like a bit of a push. On that basis, looking at January we have: 2nd/3rd - depends how much people are still suffering. :-) 9th/10th 16th/17th 23rd/24th - likely to be bad

Processed: Re: Bug#804383: jessie-pu: package libinfinity/0.6.7-1~deb8u1

Processing control commands: > tags -1 + pending Bug #804383 [release.debian.org] jessie-pu: package libinfinity/0.6.7-1~deb8u1 Added tag(s) pending. -- 804383: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=804383 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems

Bug#804383: jessie-pu: package libinfinity/0.6.7-1~deb8u1

Control: tags -1 + pending On Sat, 2015-11-21 at 18:03 +, Adam D. Barratt wrote: > Control: tags -1 + confirmed > > On Sat, 2015-11-07 at 23:29 +0100, Philipp Kern wrote: > > I would like to upload libinfinity 0.6.7-1 from stretch as > > 0.6.7-1~deb8u1 to jessie (debdiff of 0.6.6-1 to

Processed: Re: Bug#804381: jessie-pu: package s390-dasd/0.0.32~deb8u1

Processing control commands: > tags -1 + pending Bug #804381 [release.debian.org] jessie-pu: package s390-dasd/0.0.32~deb8u1 Added tag(s) pending. -- 804381: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=804381 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems

Bug#804381: jessie-pu: package s390-dasd/0.0.32~deb8u1

Control: tags -1 + pending On Sat, 2015-11-21 at 17:47 +0100, Julien Cristau wrote: > Control: tag -1 confirmed > > On Sat, Nov 7, 2015 at 22:57:06 +0100, Philipp Kern wrote: > > > Package: release.debian.org > > Severity: normal > > Tags: jessie > > User:

NEW changes in stable-new

Processing changes file: cups-filters_1.0.61-5+deb8u2_amd64.changes ACCEPT Processing changes file: cups-filters_1.0.61-5+deb8u2_arm64.changes ACCEPT Processing changes file: cups-filters_1.0.61-5+deb8u2_armel.changes ACCEPT Processing changes file: cups-filters_1.0.61-5+deb8u2_armhf.changes

Re: Updating ca-certificates through stable-updates

ugh stable-updates. Hi release team, I just requested an upload of ca-certificates (20151204) to unstable, and I would like to follow that up with stable-pu and oldstable-pu updates to include the current Mozilla CA bundle changes for jessie and wheezy. I appears that I did a wheezy-pu upd

NEW changes in stable-new

Processing changes file: libinfinity_0.6.7-1~deb8u1_arm64.changes ACCEPT Processing changes file: libinfinity_0.6.7-1~deb8u1_armel.changes ACCEPT Processing changes file: libinfinity_0.6.7-1~deb8u1_armhf.changes ACCEPT Processing changes file: libinfinity_0.6.7-1~deb8u1_i386.changes ACCEPT

NEW changes in stable-new

Processing changes file: libinfinity_0.6.7-1~deb8u1_mipsel.changes ACCEPT

Re: Updating ca-certificates through stable-updates

ould be OK pushing out new >> ca-certificates packages through stable-updates. > > Hi release team, > > I just requested an upload of ca-certificates (20151204) to unstable, > and I would like to follow that up with stable-pu and oldstable-pu > updates to include the cur

Bug#650132: hint: binary to source mapping has unhelpful side-effects

On Sat, 2011-11-26 at 20:38 +, Adam D. Barratt wrote: > hint's automagic binary to source mapping has unintended and undesired > side-effects in some circumstances. The situation where issues have > been noticed most is with "hint clean" and renamed source packages, but > it will likely

Re: 8.3 planning

Adam D. Barratt (2015-12-04): > 2nd/3rd - depends how much people are still suffering. :-) I'd rather avoid this one, but might be able to. > 9th/10th > 16th/17th > 23rd/24th - likely to be bad for me Any of those should work as far as d-i goes. Mraw, KiBi.

Re: 8.3 planning

On Fri, Dec 04, 2015 at 05:43:54PM +, Adam Barratt wrote: >Hi, > >We're a tad overdue for the 8.3 point release and with the holiday >period coming up, getting one done in December looks like a bit of a >push. > >On that basis, looking at January we have: > >2nd/3rd - depends how much people

Processed: Re: Bug#650132: hint: binary to source mapping has unhelpful side-effects

Processing control commands: > tags -1 + patch Bug #650132 [release.debian.org] hint: binary to source mapping has unhelpful side-effects Added tag(s) patch. -- 650132: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=650132 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with

Bug#650132: hint: binary to source mapping has unhelpful side-effects

Control: tags -1 + patch On Fri, 2015-12-04 at 18:09 +, Adam D. Barratt wrote: > On Sat, 2011-11-26 at 20:38 +, Adam D. Barratt wrote: > > hint's automagic binary to source mapping has unintended and undesired > > side-effects in some circumstances. The situation where issues have > >