Bug#827061: transition: openssl

On Sun, Sep 18, 2016 at 09:33:43PM +0200, Kurt Roeckx wrote: > On Sat, Jun 11, 2016 at 09:42:59PM +0200, Kurt Roeckx wrote: > > On Sat, Jun 11, 2016 at 09:31:17PM +0200, Emilio Pozuelo Monfort wrote: > > > On 11/06/16 20:59, Kurt Roeckx wrote: > > > > OpenSSL will soon release a new upstream

Bug#840295: Requesting RC exception for stretch for browserified javascript

Hi Praveen, I see that you are again asking for a blanket ruling, and are still hoping to rest that ruling on the poorly defined "browserified" term. Since this approach seems to have resulted in the very slow progress with this subject to date, might I suggest that you could speed things up by

Please add force hint to enable metaphlan2-data testing migration

Hi, please add a force-hint to add the testing migration of metaphlan2-data 2.6.0+ds-1 While metaphlan2-data is arch all it has an unsatisfiable Depends: bowtie2 on i386 which seems to block the testing migration. Thanks for your release team work Andreas. --

Bug#840501: transition: ipython

Package: release.debian.org Severity: normal User: release.debian@packages.debian.org Usertags: transition Hi, we would like to transition to ipython 5. The version currently in Debian (2.4.1) includes a notebook and a qt console. These components (at least the notebook functionality) were

Re: Please add force hint to enable sra-sdk testing migration

Hi, please add a force-hint to add the testing migration of sra-sdk 2.7.0-1 It was discussed with upstream that only amd64 architecture will be supported officially. Since we try to fix build issues on other architectures step by step there is no point in delaying the testing migration

Bug#840304: marked as done (nmu: cudf_0.8-1 libaio-ocaml_1.0.1-1)

Your message dated Wed, 12 Oct 2016 09:43:28 +0200 with message-id <6b7fbd4d-bad6-bc64-457a-33ba02014...@debian.org> and subject line Re: Bug#840304: nmu: cudf_0.8-1 libaio-ocaml_1.0.1-1 has caused the Debian Bug report #840304, regarding nmu: cudf_0.8-1 libaio-ocaml_1.0.1-1 to be marked as done.

Bug#839243: marked as done (transition: bullet)

Your message dated Wed, 12 Oct 2016 09:38:15 +0200 with message-id <61a6725d-eeb5-4c02-12cb-daf08d6b7...@debian.org> and subject line Re: Bug#839243: transition: bullet has caused the Debian Bug report #839243, regarding transition: bullet to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the

Bug#838242: transition: imagemagick

Hi, On Tue, Oct 11, 2016 at 6:14 PM, roucaries bastien wrote: > Hi, > > > On Sat, Oct 8, 2016 at 12:49 PM, Emilio Pozuelo Monfort > wrote: >> Control: tags -1 confirmed >> >> On 07/10/16 17:15, roucaries bastien wrote: >>> I have tried and

Processed: sardana: ipython transition: Please help assess the situation

Processing control commands: > block 840501 by -1 Bug #840501 [release.debian.org] transition: ipython 840501 was blocked by: 840522 840521 840520 840501 was not blocking any bugs. Added blocking bug(s) of 840501: 840524 -- 840501: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=840501 840524:

Processed: vistrails: ipython transition: Please help assess the situation

Processing control commands: > block 840501 by -1 Bug #840501 [release.debian.org] transition: ipython 840501 was blocked by: 840524 840521 840520 840522 840501 was not blocking any bugs. Added blocking bug(s) of 840501: 840525 -- 840501: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=840501

Processed: plotly: ipython transition: Please help assess the situation

Processing control commands: > block 840501 by -1 Bug #840501 [release.debian.org] transition: ipython 840501 was blocked by: 840520 840521 840501 was not blocking any bugs. Added blocking bug(s) of 840501: 840522 -- 840501: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=840501 840522:

Processed: yade: ipython transition: FTBFS with ipython 5

Processing control commands: > block 840501 by -1 Bug #840501 [release.debian.org] transition: ipython 840501 was blocked by: 840525 840522 840520 840524 840521 840501 was not blocking any bugs. Added blocking bug(s) of 840501: 840527 -- 840501:

Processed: glueviz: ipython transition: Please help assess the situation

Processing control commands: > block 840501 by -1 Bug #840501 [release.debian.org] transition: ipython 840501 was not blocked by any bugs. 840501 was not blocking any bugs. Added blocking bug(s) of 840501: 840520 -- 840501: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=840501 840520:

Bug#840501: jupyter-qtconsole is actually already packaged

I just learned that jupyter-qtconsole is already packaged in experimental: https://tracker.debian.org/pkg/python-qtconsole For glueviz, sardana and vistrails this means: could you please test your packages with the experimental ipython/jupyter packages and make the necesssary changes? Best,

Processed: lmfit-py: ipython transition: Please help assess the situation

Processing control commands: > block 840501 by -1 Bug #840501 [release.debian.org] transition: ipython 840501 was blocked by: 840520 840501 was not blocking any bugs. Added blocking bug(s) of 840501: 840521 -- 840501: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=840501 840521:

Bug#839731: jessie-pu: package mpg123/1.20.1-2+deb8u1

Control: tags -1 + pending On Sat, 2016-10-08 at 21:21 +0100, Adam D. Barratt wrote: > Control: tags -1 + confirmed > > On Tue, 2016-10-04 at 12:01 +0100, James Cowgill wrote: > > A security issue was reported against mpg123 in bug #838960. Since it > > was marked no-DSA by the security team, it

Processed: Re: Bug#839731: jessie-pu: package mpg123/1.20.1-2+deb8u1

Processing control commands: > tags -1 + pending Bug #839731 [release.debian.org] jessie-pu: package mpg123/1.20.1-2+deb8u1 Added tag(s) pending. -- 839731: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=839731 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems

Processed: Re: Bug#839814: jessie-pu: package sympa/6.1.23~dfsg-2+deb8u1

Processing control commands: > tags -1 + pending Bug #839814 [release.debian.org] jessie-pu: package sympa/6.1.23~dfsg-2+deb8u1 Added tag(s) pending. -- 839814: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=839814 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems

Bug#839927: jessie-pu: package rawtherapee/4.2-1+deb8u1

Control: tags -1 + pending On Sat, 2016-10-08 at 21:11 +0100, Adam D. Barratt wrote: > Control: tags -1 + confirmed > > On Fri, 2016-10-07 at 00:26 +0200, Philip Rinn wrote: > > Sorry, I didn't attach the debdiff, it was only a 'git diff ...' Now I > > attached > > the real debdiff. > > Please

Bug#840127: jessie-pu: package libio-socket-ssl-perl/2.002-2+deb8u2

Control: tags -1 + pending On Sun, 2016-10-09 at 07:29 +0200, Salvatore Bonaccorso wrote: > Hi Adam, > > On Sat, Oct 08, 2016 at 09:10:33PM +0100, Adam D. Barratt wrote: > > Control: tags -1 + confirmed > > > > On Sat, 2016-10-08 at 17:37 +0200, Salvatore Bonaccorso wrote: > > > We were asked

Processed: Re: Bug#839927: jessie-pu: package rawtherapee/4.2-1+deb8u1

Processing control commands: > tags -1 + pending Bug #839927 [release.debian.org] jessie-pu: package rawtherapee/4.2-1+deb8u1 Added tag(s) pending. -- 839927: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=839927 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems

Processed: Re: Bug#840127: jessie-pu: package libio-socket-ssl-perl/2.002-2+deb8u2

Processing control commands: > tags -1 + pending Bug #840127 [release.debian.org] jessie-pu: package libio-socket-ssl-perl/2.002-2+deb8u2 Added tag(s) pending. -- 840127: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=840127 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with

Processed: Re: Bug#840188: jessie-pu: package tevent/0.9.25-0+deb8u1

Processing control commands: > tags -1 + pending Bug #840188 [release.debian.org] jessie-pu: package tevent/0.9.25-0+deb8u1 Added tag(s) pending. -- 840188: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=840188 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems

Bug#839814: jessie-pu: package sympa/6.1.23~dfsg-2+deb8u1

Control: tags -1 + pending On Sun, 2016-10-09 at 07:22 +0200, Salvatore Bonaccorso wrote: > Hi Adam, > > On Sat, Oct 08, 2016 at 09:18:50PM +0100, Adam D. Barratt wrote: > > Control: tags -1 + confirmed > > > > On Wed, 2016-10-05 at 12:56 +0200, Salvatore Bonaccorso wrote: > > > Sympa is

Bug#840188: jessie-pu: package tevent/0.9.25-0+deb8u1

Control: tags -1 + pending On Tue, 2016-10-11 at 22:43 +, Jelmer Vernooij wrote: > On Tue, Oct 11, 2016 at 09:15:22PM +0100, Adam D. Barratt wrote: > > Control: tags -1 + confirmed > > > > On Sun, 2016-10-09 at 12:15 +, Jelmer Vernooij wrote: > > > I would like to update tevent in jessie

Please add force hint to enable SSPACE testing migration

Hi, please add a force-hint to add the testing migration of sspace 2.1.1+dfsg-2 While sspace is arch all it has an unsatisfiable Depends: bowtie on i386 which seems to block the testing migration. Thanks for your release team work Andreas. -- http://fam-tille.de

Re: Please add force hint to enable sra-sdk testing migration

On Wed, Oct 12, 2016 at 11:51:49 +0200, Andreas Tille wrote: > Hi, > > please add a force-hint to add the testing migration of > > sra-sdk 2.7.0-1 > > It was discussed with upstream that only amd64 architecture will > be supported officially. Since we try to fix build issues on other

NEW changes in stable-new

Processing changes file: ghostscript_9.06~dfsg-2+deb8u2_allonly.changes ACCEPT Processing changes file: ghostscript_9.06~dfsg-2+deb8u2_amd64.changes ACCEPT Processing changes file: ghostscript_9.06~dfsg-2+deb8u2_arm64.changes ACCEPT Processing changes file:

Bug#840295: Requesting RC exception for stretch for browserified javascript

On Mon, Oct 10, 2016 at 15:27:02 +0530, Pirate Praveen wrote: > package: release.debian.org > > Dear Release Team, > > As discussed with FTP masters[1], I'd like to request an RC exception > for browserified javascript packages already in the archive. > > Hopefully we'll be able to complete a