Bug#855691: unblock: pg-repack/1.3.4-3

2017-02-21 Thread Christoph Berg
Package: release.debian.org Severity: normal User: release.debian@packages.debian.org Usertags: unblock Please unblock package pg-repack, it fixes autopkgtest failures. diff --git a/debian/changelog b/debian/changelog index 84bd269..86e1726 100644 --- a/debian/changelog +++

Re: Rebuilding packages to increase Stretch's PIE coverage

2017-02-21 Thread Bálint Réczey
Hi All, 2017-02-19 12:46 GMT+01:00 Julien Cristau : > On Sun, Feb 19, 2017 at 12:45:09 +0100, Julien Cristau wrote: > >> On Wed, Feb 15, 2017 at 16:49:08 +0100, Bálint Réczey wrote: >> >> > Dear Release Team, >> > >> > GCC uses PIE by default in unstable and testing but most

Bug#855697: unblock: setools/4.0.1-6

2017-02-21 Thread Laurent Bigonville
Package: release.debian.org Severity: normal User: release.debian@packages.debian.org Usertags: unblock Hi, I realised that the apol documentation was not properly built and installed. This is fixed in 4.0.1-6 Please unblock package setools unblock setools/4.0.1-6 -- System Information:

Bug#855693: ftp.debian.org: remove powerpc from stretch-security

2017-02-21 Thread Julien Cristau
Package: ftp.debian.org Severity: important X-Debbugs-Cc: debian-release@lists.debian.org Hi, powerpc is not a release arch for stretch, please dak admin s-a rm testing powerpc on security-master. Cheers, Julien

Ontdek hoe u de koopkracht van de werknemers van Broekaert J kunt verhogen

2017-02-21 Thread Sodexo
De maaltijdcheque blijft het meeste gesmaakt extralegale voordeel van de Belgen. Meer info: http://www.kapamedia.eu/sodexo/form.htm?lng=nl=sodexo_campaign=sodexo_source=admr_medium=email=debian-release@lists.debian.org Dankzij de e-Lunch Pass, de elektronische maaltijdcheque, biedt u een

Bug#855815: unblock: glabels/3.4.0-2

2017-02-21 Thread Jakob Haufe
Package: release.debian.org Severity: normal User: release.debian@packages.debian.org Usertags: unblock -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA512 Please unblock package glabels The new package builds correctly on all release architectures:

Bug#855816: unblock: mypaint/1.2.0-4

2017-02-21 Thread Andrew Chadwick
Package: release.debian.org Severity: normal User: release.debian@packages.debian.org Usertags: unblock Please unblock package mypaint. MyPaint 1.2.0-4, currently in unstable for 17 days, contains a targetted fix for bug 848356. This bug has been assigned a severity of important becuase it

Bug#855820: RM: azure-cli/0.1.0~b7-1

2017-02-21 Thread Iain R. Learmonth
Package: release.debian.org Severity: normal User: release.debian@packages.debian.org Usertags: rm Hi, In the opinion of the maintainer (me), this is not fit for release. I intent to support this in stretch via backports only. Thanks, Iain. -- System Information: Debian Release: 9.0 APT

Re: Various unblock-udebs

2017-02-21 Thread Niels Thykier
Cyril Brulebois: > Emilio Pozuelo Monfort (2017-02-22): >> Some more: >> >> #854474 src:alsa-libalsa-lib: FTBFS when built with >> dpkg-buildpackage -A > > No objections. > >> #854616 scdaemonscdaemon cannot access yubikey using ccid >> driver without

Re: Bug#704303: violates Debian Policy 2.3 Copyright considerations

2017-02-21 Thread Pirate Praveen
On Sun, 19 Feb 2017 12:43:30 +0530 Pirate Praveen wrote: > On Sun, 1 Jan 2017 16:55:52 +0500 Andrey Rahmatullin > wrote: > > Note that since Policy 3.9.9 MPL should be in common-licenses. > > Reassigning to firefox, which also has the same issue. When is

Bug#855816: marked as done (unblock: mypaint/1.2.0-4)

2017-02-21 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Wed, 22 Feb 2017 07:08:00 + with message-id <73b388eb-8e9c-c35a-a856-2a575cc59...@thykier.net> and subject line Re: Bug#855816: unblock: mypaint/1.2.0-4 has caused the Debian Bug report #855816, regarding unblock: mypaint/1.2.0-4 to be marked as done. This means that you

Bug#855807: unblock: fltk1.3/1.3.4-3

2017-02-21 Thread Aaron M. Ucko
Package: release.debian.org Severity: normal User: release.debian@packages.debian.org Usertags: unblock Please unblock package fltk1.3. It's been available for all architectures for just over a week without incident (but can wait the full ten days if you prefer), and the only difference

Re: Various unblock-udebs

2017-02-21 Thread Emilio Pozuelo Monfort
On 14/02/17 10:20, Emilio Pozuelo Monfort wrote: > On 14/02/17 03:48, Cyril Brulebois wrote: >> Hello, >> >> Emilio asked me on IRC to have a look at a bunch of packages which both >> have block-udeb and RC bug fixes. Here's a list with comments, I'm OK >> with unblock-udeb'ing most of them (which

Bug#827061: transition: openssl

2017-02-21 Thread Sebastian Andrzej Siewior
On 2017-01-28 19:37:09 [+0100], Julien Cristau wrote: > At this point, it seems clear to me that we're getting nowhere fast. > With the freeze looming in a few days, this is growing to be a very big > risk for the stretch release. Where do we stand on the openssl transition from the perspective

Bug#855554: unblock: debian-goodies/0.69

2017-02-21 Thread Emilio Pozuelo Monfort
On 20/02/17 02:58, Axel Beckert wrote: > Package: release.debian.org > Severity: normal > User: release.debian@packages.debian.org > Usertags: unblock > > Please unblock the just uploaded debian-goodies version 0.69. (Not yet > accepted due to a just started dinstall run, but should be

Bug#855691: marked as done (unblock: pg-repack/1.3.4-3)

2017-02-21 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Tue, 21 Feb 2017 17:47:00 + with message-id <90f55dde-c5f5-bef5-713c-11cc96c5a...@thykier.net> and subject line Re: Bug#855691: unblock: pg-repack/1.3.4-3 has caused the Debian Bug report #855691, regarding unblock: pg-repack/1.3.4-3 to be marked as done. This means that

Re: multipath-tools 0.6.4-4 debdiff review

2017-02-21 Thread Julien Cristau
On Mon, Feb 20, 2017 at 20:20:34 +0530, Ritesh Raj Sarraf wrote: > Dear Release Team, > > Package: multipath-tools > Version: 0.6.4-4 > Request: Pre-Approval > > Please find attached a debdiff of 0.6.4-3 and 0.6.4-4. > > These are minor changes, which should qualify for an upload exception.

Bug#855650: marked as done (is it worth trying to unblock slimit/0.8.1-2 ?)

2017-02-21 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Tue, 21 Feb 2017 19:58:02 +0100 with message-id <20170221185802.dgfdh23ld2c6d...@betterave.cristau.org> and subject line Re: Bug#855650: is it worth truing to unblock slimit/0.8.1-2 ? has caused the Debian Bug report #855650, regarding is it worth trying to unblock

Bug#855811: release.debian.org: release.d.o WWW should explicitly recommend against uploading to sid during the freeze

2017-02-21 Thread Sean Whitton
Package: release.debian.org Severity: wishlist Dear release team, release.d.o WWW says If you are unable to bring your fix through unstable, for example because there are unrelated changes already uploaded there, the release team can grant you permission to use the

Bug#855813: marked as done (unblock: pound/2.7-1.3)

2017-02-21 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Tue, 21 Feb 2017 22:31:55 + with message-id and subject line unblock pound has caused the Debian Bug report #855813, regarding unblock: pound/2.7-1.3 to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt

Bug#855685: marked as done (unblock: irssi-plugin-robustirc/0.6-4)

2017-02-21 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Tue, 21 Feb 2017 23:21:27 +0100 with message-id <20170221222125.ga18...@ugent.be> and subject line Re: unblock: irssi-plugin-robustirc/0.6-4 has caused the Debian Bug report #855685, regarding unblock: irssi-plugin-robustirc/0.6-4 to be marked as done. This means that you claim

Bug#855807: marked as done (unblock: fltk1.3/1.3.4-3)

2017-02-21 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Tue, 21 Feb 2017 22:30:38 + with message-id and subject line unblock fltk1.3 has caused the Debian Bug report #855807, regarding unblock: fltk1.3/1.3.4-3 to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt

Bug#855814: unblock: graphite2/1.3.9-4

2017-02-21 Thread Rene Engelhard
Hi, On Tue, Feb 21, 2017 at 11:25:34PM +0100, Rene Engelhard wrote: > diff -Nru graphite2-1.3.9/debian/libgraphite2-3-dbg.substvars > graphite2-1.3.9/debian/libgraphite2-3-dbg.substvars > --- graphite2-1.3.9/debian/libgraphite2-3-dbg.substvars 2016-11-17 > 13:54:13.0 +0100 > +++

Bug#855534: marked as done (unblock: multiple packages, didn't make it to testing due to openssl1.1)

2017-02-21 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Tue, 21 Feb 2017 23:37:08 +0100 with message-id <8b634bce-464f-0f38-0879-eae960074...@debian.org> and subject line Re: Bug#855534: unblock: multiple packages, didn't make it to testing due to openssl1.1 has caused the Debian Bug report #855534, regarding unblock: multiple

Bug#855163: marked as done (nmu: mariadb-10.1_10.1.21-5)

2017-02-21 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Tue, 21 Feb 2017 23:45:33 +0100 with message-id and subject line Re: Processed (with 2 errors): Re: [debian-mysql] Bug#855163: Missing mariadb-plugin-tokudb binary package on amd64 has caused the Debian Bug report #855163,

Bug#855697: marked as done (unblock: setools/4.0.1-6)

2017-02-21 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Tue, 21 Feb 2017 23:35:44 +0100 with message-id <20170221223542.ga19...@ugent.be> and subject line Re: unblock: setools/4.0.1-6 has caused the Debian Bug report #855697, regarding unblock: setools/4.0.1-6 to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been

Bug#855813: unblock: pound/2.7-1.3

2017-02-21 Thread Sebastian Andrzej Siewior
Package: release.debian.org User: release.debian@packages.debian.org Usertags: unblock Severity: normal Please unblock package pound. It has been removed from testing due openssl1.1. It has been fixed and user confirmed in #855458 that it is working. Please find attach the debdiff against .2

Bug#855814: unblock: graphite2/1.3.9-4

2017-02-21 Thread Rene Engelhard
Package: release.debian.org Severity: normal User: release.debian@packages.debian.org Usertags: unblock Please unblock package graphite2 1.3.9-1 FTBFSed on *i386 with the tests failing[1]. Discussion with upstream at that time resulted in disabling the tests (see the log in the patch file

Bug#855814: marked as done (unblock: graphite2/1.3.9-4)

2017-02-21 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Tue, 21 Feb 2017 22:33:04 + with message-id and subject line unblock graphite2 has caused the Debian Bug report #855814, regarding unblock: graphite2/1.3.9-4 to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been

Bug#855328: marked as done (nmu: deal.ii_8.4.2-2)

2017-02-21 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Tue, 21 Feb 2017 23:42:12 +0100 with message-id and subject line Re: Bug#855328: nmu: deal.ii_8.4.2-2 has caused the Debian Bug report #855328, regarding nmu: deal.ii_8.4.2-2 to be marked as done. This means that you claim that

Bug#855591: marked as done (unblock libapache2-mod-auth-openidc/2.1.5-1)

2017-02-21 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Tue, 21 Feb 2017 22:56:12 + with message-id and subject line unblock libapache2-mod-auth-openidc has caused the Debian Bug report #855591, regarding unblock libapache2-mod-auth-openidc/2.1.5-1 to be marked as done. This means that you

Processed: Re: Bug#855591: unblock libapache2-mod-auth-openidc/2.1.5-1

2017-02-21 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > severity 855591 normal Bug #855591 {Done: Emilio Pozuelo Monfort } [release.debian.org] unblock libapache2-mod-auth-openidc/2.1.5-1 Severity set to 'normal' from 'important' > thanks Stopping processing here. Please

Re: Various unblock-udebs

2017-02-21 Thread Cyril Brulebois
Emilio Pozuelo Monfort (2017-02-22): > Some more: > > #854474 src:alsa-libalsa-lib: FTBFS when built with > dpkg-buildpackage -A No objections. > #854616 scdaemonscdaemon cannot access yubikey using ccid > driver without pcscd Not sure it's d-i

Bug#827061: transition: openssl

2017-02-21 Thread Emilio Pozuelo Monfort
On 22/02/17 00:28, Sebastian Andrzej Siewior wrote: > On 2017-01-28 19:37:09 [+0100], Julien Cristau wrote: >> At this point, it seems clear to me that we're getting nowhere fast. >> With the freeze looming in a few days, this is growing to be a very big >> risk for the stretch release. > > Where