On 15562 March 1977, Adam D. Barratt wrote:
- November 9th
- November 16th
- November 23rd
All work for me.
--
bye, Joerg
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
Tags: stretch
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: pu
Hi,
This is a backport of nodejs 8.11.1 from stretch-backports into stretch proper,
to be used by the upcoming Firefox ESR 68, package under its own name to avoid
problems in
On Mon, Oct 21, 2019 at 08:26:52PM +0100, Adam Barratt wrote:
>Hi,
>
>It's (really past) time to consider a date for the second buster point
>release.
>
>I've listed some suggested dates below; please indicate which you would
>be available for.
>
>- November 2nd
> - I'm not available; also means
Adam D. Barratt (2019-10-21):
> It's (really past) time to consider a date for the second buster point
> release.
I haven't been paying close attention to -boot over the past few days,
but I don't have anything to get fixed in buster right away AFAICT, so
please take the following with a grain
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
Tags: stretch
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: pu
This is a backport of buster's rustc, needed for Firefox ESR 68. It will be
bootstrapped using the upstream binaries as the stage0 compiler, we can disable
those and use the
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
Tags: stretch
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: pu
This is a backport of cbindgen from buster to stretch. It embeds a few
build-deps, since they are statically linked anyway I didn't think it made sense
to package all these
Package: release.debian.org
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: pu
Tags: buster
Severity: normal
Dear RT
In buster, ndppd has a world writable pid file. This prevent the daemon
to be stop/restarted, which is a real pain when you set it up.
I would like to backport the fix
Hi Dmitry,
On 22-10-2019 22:19, Dmitry Shachnev wrote:
> On Tue, Oct 22, 2019 at 09:57:16PM +0200, Paul Gevers wrote:
>> I have scheduled those. First build failures are appearing. Can you
>> please check?
>>
>> https://buildd.debian.org/status/package.php?p=deepin-qt5dxcb-plugin
>>
Control: tags -1 -moreinfo
Hi Paul,
> On 15-10-2019 23:53, Sandro Knauß wrote:
> > I'm not sure, what ben rules you want, I can create ben rules for all
> > 38 packages, but as the 57 packages are get a new upload anyways,
> > those get recompiled anyways.
>
> This sounds like one transition,
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> tags 942415 -moreinfo
Bug #942415 [release.debian.org] transition: meta-kdepim
Removed tag(s) moreinfo.
>
End of message, stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
--
942415:
On Tue, Oct 22, 2019 at 09:57:16PM +0200, Paul Gevers wrote:
> I have scheduled those. First build failures are appearing. Can you
> please check?
>
> https://buildd.debian.org/status/package.php?p=deepin-qt5dxcb-plugin
> https://buildd.debian.org/status/package.php?p=xdg-desktop-portal-kde
>
Thanks Julien,
> Looks ok, go ahead. It would have been helpful to note that and when
> this was fixed in sid, since there's no corresponding debian bug.
I changed d/changelog to mention that this was fixed in upstream's 3.11.1
sid and testing currently have 3.11.2, I hope that helps clear it
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
On Sun, 2019-10-20 at 21:33 +0200, Paul Gevers wrote:
> Sorry for taking so long, but I have the feeling that the binNMU isn't
> appropriate. I take the silence from the other team members to mean
> something similar.
To be honest, I'm a bit
Dear release team,
On Mon, Oct 21, 2019 at 09:38:39AM -0300, Lisandro Damián Nicanor Pérez Meyer
wrote:
> On 19/10/20 08:55, Paul Gevers wrote:
> > I think we are ready for this. Please go ahead.
>
> Thanks! Dmitry started it yesterday.
I have uploaded all of Qt yesterday, but some
Control: tags -1 moreinfo
Hi Sandro,
On 15-10-2019 23:53, Sandro Knauß wrote:
> I'm not sure, what ben rules you want, I can create ben rules for all
> 38 packages, but as the 57 packages are get a new upload anyways,
> those get recompiled anyways.
This sounds like one transition, so I think
Processing control commands:
> tags -1 moreinfo
Bug #942415 [release.debian.org] transition: meta-kdepim
Added tag(s) moreinfo.
--
942415: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=942415
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
Hi Dmitry,
On 22-10-2019 17:49, Dmitry Shachnev wrote:
> You can start scheduling binNMUs already. An extra build-dependency on
> qtbase5-dev (>= 5.12) is enough to make sure it builds against the new
> version. For qtcreator, please also add qbs-dev (>= 1.13).
I have scheduled those. First
Hi,
Hector Oron writes:
> I would like to support Debian Linux kernel team by doing kernel
> package uploads.
Related to Linux uploads: I've added an exception to allow source-only
uploads to NEW for src:linux. Feel free to try.
Ansgar
On Wed, Oct 23, 2019 at 7:03 AM Ricardo Mones wrote:
> The claws-mail package appears blocked from migrating to testing because
> of #885266 which removed 3.17.3-2 from it, but is already fixed in 3.17.4-2,
> in sid since 8 days ago…
It seems to be because claws-mail-python-plugin 3.17.3-1 is
Hi all,
The claws-mail package appears blocked from migrating to testing because
of #885266 which removed 3.17.3-2 from it, but is already fixed in 3.17.4-2,
in sid since 8 days ago…
Any pointers on how fix this?
Thanks in advance,
P.S.: please Cc on reply, I'm not subscribed to debian-release
Hi,
> BTW, ISTR there is a plan to remove GTK 2 from Debian at some point,
> so it would be a good idea to talk to upstream about switching to GTK
> 3.
Is there any link for it? It seems that it affects sylpheed package
and I want to ask it to the upstream maintainer.
--
Hideki Yamane
On Wed, 2019-10-23 at 11:39 +0900, Hideki Yamane wrote:
> Is there any link for it? It seems that it affects sylpheed package
> and I want to ask it to the upstream maintainer.
Not yet, I suggest talking to the GNOME team about it.
--
bye,
pabs
https://wiki.debian.org/PaulWise
On Wed, 23 Oct 2019 11:48:02 +0800
Paul Wise wrote:
> > Is there any link for it? It seems that it affects sylpheed package
> > and I want to ask it to the upstream maintainer.
>
> Not yet, I suggest talking to the GNOME team about it.
Thanks, I'll do it.
--
Hideki Yamane
23 matches
Mail list logo
