Control: tag -1 -moreinfo
Hi Sebastian!
Hope this one can be unblocked, too :)
--
Vasyl Gello
==
Certified SolidWorks Expert
Mob.:+380 (98) 465 66 77
E-Mail: vasek.ge...@gmail.com
Skype: vasek.gello
Processing control commands:
> tag -1 -moreinfo
Bug #988616 [release.debian.org] unblock:
kodi-inputstream-ffmpegdirect/1.21.3+ds1-1
Removed tag(s) moreinfo.
--
988616: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=988616
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with
Processing control commands:
> tag -1 -moreinfo
Bug #988618 [release.debian.org] unblock: kodi-pvr-iptvsimple/7.6.5+ds1-1
Removed tag(s) moreinfo.
--
988618: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=988618
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
Control: tag -1 -moreinfo
Hi Sebastian!
Dropping moreinfo tag since bullseye branch with picked fixes in in Salsa for a
week.
Cheers!
--
Vasyl Gello
==
Certified SolidWorks Expert
Mob.:+380 (98) 465 66 77
E-Mail: vasek.ge...@gmail.com
Skype:
On 6/14/21 1:49 PM, Sebastiaan Couwenberg wrote:
> On 6/14/21 1:30 PM, Andreas Beckmann wrote:
>> On 14/06/2021 10.06, Sebastiaan Couwenberg wrote:
>>> What actual problems do are solved by making them co-installable?
>>>
>>> So far the only actualy problem that has been identified is the need for
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: unblock
Please pre-approve unblock of package opendmarc
Recently several fixes for CVEs in OpenDMARC have landed in bullseye
thanks to unblock request #989324 being granted.
Now reports of
On 6/15/21 8:23 AM, Andreas Beckmann wrote:
> On 15/06/2021 06.05, Sebastiaan Couwenberg wrote:
>> From the many other packages I haven't seen other issues other than the
>> partial upgrade with monteverdi which is fixed with Breaks/Replaces.
>>
>> I really need more concrete cases to justify
Re: Sebastiaan Couwenberg
> Since the upgrade procedure documented in the release notes includes
> purging removed and obsolete packages, users are not expected to keep
> libgda20 around after the distribution upgrade.
To avoid exactly this problem, postgresql-common is maintaining a list
of PG
Re: Andreas Beckmann
> > modulo the problem I ran into. (I still have to retry it.)
>
> Didn't see this on my side.
> Your --force-depends probably affected more than just libgdal20.
Found the problem, I had not restarted postgresql-11 after the
upgrade, so it was still linked against the old
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: unblock
Please unblock package otrs2
It fixes two security issues with the upstream patches.
changelog | 15 ++
patches/14-ZSA-2021-03.diff | 100
Package: ftp.debian.org
Severity: normal
X-Debbugs-Cc: debian-b...@lists.debian.org, debian-release@lists.debian.org
(Filing manually since reportbug seems not to like me much today.)
Hi,
Please remove all debian-installer-10-netboot-* binaries, previously
built by
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: unblock
Please unblock package xdot
[ Reason ]
Fixing a (non-filed) RC bug - missing dependency on numpy.
https://github.com/zim-desktop-wiki/zim-desktop-wiki/issues/1496
[ Impact ]
The package
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: unblock
Please unblock package kid3. It fixes the fucked-up manpages about the whole
packaging and simplifies it by just installing all manpage stuff to the
kid3-core
package. The old behaviour
On 18/06/2021 09.50, Sebastiaan Couwenberg wrote:
I'm increasingly in favor of removing the Breaks from gdal-data, the
attached procedure works for me in buster chroot.
There is much less need for gdal-data breaking libgdal20 for us than
there is in the UbuntuGIS PPA use case. I'm not aware
Processing control commands:
> tags -1 - moreinfo
Bug #989916 [release.debian.org] unblock: gcc-mingw-w64/24.2
Removed tag(s) moreinfo.
--
989916: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=989916
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
Control: tags -1 - moreinfo
Hi Graham,
On Wed, 16 Jun 2021 11:55:48 +0200, Graham Inggs wrote:
> There's a typo in your changelog, the bug number should be #989862:
>
> +gcc-mingw-w64 (24.2) unstable; urgency=medium
> +
> + * Fix gcov handling: we need to tell GCC that we have headers,
Your message dated Fri, 18 Jun 2021 22:04:07 +0200
with message-id
and subject line Re: Bug#990049: unblock: guile-3.0/3.0.5-4
has caused the Debian Bug report #990049,
regarding unblock: guile-3.0/3.0.5-4
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If
Your message dated Fri, 18 Jun 2021 22:13:47 +0200
with message-id <74b55e71-0fa5-b29b-f445-c3a7f8a92...@debian.org>
and subject line Re: Bug#988662: unblock: apt/2.2.4
has caused the Debian Bug report #988662,
regarding unlock: apt/2.2.4
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the
Hi Kevin
On 2021-06-18 10:48:05 -0600, Kevin Locke wrote:
> On 2021-06-17 22:32:46 +0200, Sebastian Ramacher wrote:
> > On 2021-06-17 19:54:51, Carsten Schoenert wrote:
> >> Unfortunately rather also quickly I got some bug reports about
> >> Thunderbird isn't correctly working in
Hi Utkarsh
On 06-06-2021 06:14, Paul Gevers wrote:
> I am hoping it's possible to just downgrade the *dependency* in rails
> only, such that the upload can happen via unstable. There is no "direct
> bullseye" route. Or do you expect you'll have to make (lots) of changes
> to rails to match the
On 6/18/21 5:19 PM, Andreas Beckmann wrote:
> On 18/06/2021 09.50, Sebastiaan Couwenberg wrote:
>> I'm increasingly in favor of removing the Breaks from gdal-data, the
>> attached procedure works for me in buster chroot.
>
>> There is much less need for gdal-data breaking libgdal20 for us than
>>
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: unblock
unblock guile-3.0/3.0.5-4
Please unblock package guile-3.0.
[ Reason ]
The (only) changes between -2 and -4 fix a significant bug that can
cause packages that depend on libguile to
On 2021-06-17 22:32:46 +0200, Sebastian Ramacher wrote:
> On 2021-06-17 19:54:51, Carsten Schoenert wrote:
>> Unfortunately rather also quickly I got some bug reports about
>> Thunderbird isn't correctly working in testing/bullseye, but has before
>> in version 1:78.10.0-1.
>>
>>
uwsgi's testing excuses [1] currently shows (amd64 only for clarity):
migrating uwsgi-core/2.0.19.1-7.1/amd64 to testing makes
uwsgi-plugin-luajit/2.0.19.1+5+0.0.6/amd64 uninstallable
migrating uwsgi-core/2.0.19.1-7.1/amd64 to testing makes
uwsgi-plugin-mongo/2.0.19.1+5+0.0.7/amd64 uninstallable
Hi Sebastian,
On Fri, 2021-06-18 at 22:26 +0200, Sebastian Ramacher wrote:
> Thanks for this detailed analysis. That actually means that the symbol
> file for libnss3 2:3.67-1 is broken. It would need to bump the minimum
> version requirement for all symbols that works with SSLChannelInfo. From
>
Hi,
I noticed that you've uploaded a "distcc" package to the queue for
proposed-updates.
The changelog for that update refers to #919704, but the BTS metadata
for that bug currently suggests that it affects every version of the
package from 3.3.2-5 onwards, including the version currently in
Your message dated Fri, 18 Jun 2021 21:14:24 +
with message-id
and subject line unblock otrs2
has caused the Debian Bug report #990030,
regarding unblock: otrs2/6.0.32-5
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now
Your message dated Fri, 18 Jun 2021 21:11:41 +
with message-id
and subject line unblock ntpsec
has caused the Debian Bug report #989976,
regarding unblock: ntpsec/1.2.0+dfsg1-4
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is
Your message dated Fri, 18 Jun 2021 21:12:56 +
with message-id
and subject line unblock xdot
has caused the Debian Bug report #990036,
regarding unblock: xdot/1.2-2
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your
29 matches
Mail list logo
