Bug#1068118: bullseye-pu: package amavisd-new/2.11.1-5+deb11u1

Package: release.debian.org Severity: normal Tags: bullseye User: release.debian@packages.debian.org Usertags: pu X-Debbugs-Cc: amavisd-...@packages.debian.org, b...@debian.org Control: affects -1 + src:amavisd-new [ Reason ] * Fix CVE-2024-28054. [ Impact ] Without this path: *

Processed: bullseye-pu: package amavisd-new/2.11.1-5+deb11u1

Processing control commands: > affects -1 + src:amavisd-new Bug #1068118 [release.debian.org] bullseye-pu: package amavisd-new/2.11.1-5+deb11u1 Added indication that 1068118 affects src:amavisd-new -- 1068118: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1068118 Debian Bug Tracking System

Processed: nmu: opencolorio_2.1.3+dfsg-1.1

Processing control commands: > affects -1 + src:opencolorio Bug #1068128 [release.debian.org] nmu: opencolorio_2.1.3+dfsg-1.1 Added indication that 1068128 affects src:opencolorio -- 1068128: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1068128 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact

Bug#1068069: marked as done (nmu: juce_7.0.5+ds-1)

Your message dated Sun, 31 Mar 2024 11:39:22 +0200 with message-id and subject line Re: Bug#1068069: nmu: juce_7.0.5+ds-1 has caused the Debian Bug report #1068069, regarding nmu: juce_7.0.5+ds-1 to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not

Bug#1068128: nmu: opencolorio_2.1.3+dfsg-1.1

Package: release.debian.org Severity: normal X-Debbugs-Cc: opencolo...@packages.debian.org Control: affects -1 + src:opencolorio User: release.debian@packages.debian.org Usertags: binnmu nmu opencolorio_2.1.3+dfsg-1.1 . armel armhf . unstable . -m "Rebuild on buildds"

Bug#1068128: marked as done (nmu: opencolorio_2.1.3+dfsg-1.1)

Your message dated Sun, 31 Mar 2024 16:55:14 +0200 with message-id and subject line Re: Bug#1068128: nmu: opencolorio_2.1.3+dfsg-1.1 has caused the Debian Bug report #1068128, regarding nmu: opencolorio_2.1.3+dfsg-1.1 to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been

Bug#1067985: marked as done (nmu: libevent_2.1.12-stable-8.1)

Your message dated Sun, 31 Mar 2024 16:55:31 +0200 with message-id and subject line Re: Bug#1067985: nmu: libevent_2.1.12-stable-8.1 has caused the Debian Bug report #1067985, regarding nmu: libevent_2.1.12-stable-8.1 to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been

NEW changes in stable-new

Processing changes file: bash_5.2.15-2+b3_amd64-buildd.changes ACCEPT Processing changes file: bash_5.2.15-2+b3_arm64-buildd.changes ACCEPT Processing changes file: bash_5.2.15-2+b3_armel-buildd.changes ACCEPT Processing changes file: bash_5.2.15-2+b3_armhf-buildd.changes ACCEPT Processing

Bug#1068106: bookworm-pu: package libarchive/3.6.2-1+deb12u1

On Sat, Mar 30, 2024 at 08:51:10PM +0200, Peter Pentchev wrote: > Package: release.debian.org > Severity: normal > Tags: bookworm > X-Debbugs-Cc: libarch...@packages.debian.org, r...@debian.org > Control: affects -1 + src:libarchive > User: release.debian@packages.debian.org > Usertags: pu >

Processed: Merge duplicates

Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > reassign 1068160 haskell-haskell-gi Bug #1068160 [src:haskell-gi-glib] haskell-gi-glib: FTBFS on mips64el: couldn't find API description for GLib.time_t Bug reassigned from package 'src:haskell-gi-glib' to 'haskell-haskell-gi'. No longer marked

Bug#1067872: marked as done (transition: netcdf)

Your message dated Mon, 1 Apr 2024 06:23:29 +0200 with message-id and subject line Re: Bug#1067872: transition: netcdf has caused the Debian Bug report #1067872, regarding transition: netcdf to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the