shadow 4.0.3-30.5 just hit sid yesterday.
As usual, this is a NMU by myself, as Karl Ramm, the maintainer is
very discreet since the last 6 months (indeed, my last exchanges with
him were after Debconf) and Sam Hartman, his co-maintainer indicated
he has no real intent of maintaining this package
Anthony Towns wrote:
Drawing conclusions isn't so bad, but that one's not quite helpful --
you've done all the work, but it all has to be done again in order to
actually follow through on the recommendation. There's nothing wrong
with that, but it's less helpful than it could be.
Right, I
Ifupdown latest version (0.6.4-4.10) has been out for quite a while (since
August) and if includes: translation fixes (#248717, #249233, #247772),
documentation fixes (including #259609, #247772, #255218 ) and normal bug
fixes (#250713, #245067, #242607, #255228, #121755, #258965, #255574,
On Fri, Dec 17, 2004 at 12:24:59PM +0100, Santiago Vila wrote:
procmail (3.22-10) unstable; urgency=low
* Modified autoconf to hardcode 127.0.0.1 as the address for localhost,
instead of taking the value from the machine on which the package is
being built. Reported by Stephen
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi Andi,
as we are getting closer to the sarge release, I have to ask you
to try to manually force the latest workman package into sarge.
Since version 1.3.4-17 the package is in a deadlock situation,
because the ia64 support was removed due to the
On Mon, Dec 20, 2004 at 06:43:28AM +0100, Goswin von Brederlow wrote:
Jeroen van Wolffelaar [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
http://ftp-master.wolffelaar.nl/removals.html
Do you want the scripts from buildd.net (or rewrites thereof like
Igloos page) too?
That'd be a nice addition to
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I know this package has been frozen but, since this package has been widely
tested, and there are no RC bugs, could it be considered a candidate for
moving into sarge?
If this could be done then a new netbase version (4.20?) could be uploaded
Seconded.
--
ciao,
Marco
Hi.
doc-linux 2004.11-1 is in unstable for 20 days and only contains the
usual monthly update stuff. Please approve it for sarge.
Gruesse,
--
Frank Lichtenheld [EMAIL PROTECTED]
www: http://www.djpig.de/
On Mon, Dec 20, 2004 at 05:32:40PM +0100, Frank Lichtenheld wrote:
doc-linux 2004.11-1 is in unstable for 20 days and only contains the
usual monthly update stuff. Please approve it for sarge.
Approved.
Cheers,
--
Colin Watson [EMAIL PROTECTED]
The -2 release of lzo 1.08 (frozen) was a packaging cleanup, which I
never really intended to go into sarge considering the expected
timeline back then. But now I feel that it has waited long enough that
it might as well be pushed into sarge, in the interest of having
everything on the same
Hello,
Could you please requeue libapache-mod-auth-pgsql for building? Currently,
the grave bug #282309 is still affecting testing, as the package hasn't
propagated to testing yet.
regards
Andrew
--
linux.conf.au 2005 - http://lca2005.linux.org.au/ - Birthplace of Tux
April 18th to 23rd
11 matches
Mail list logo