Please prepare for a request to hint shadow

2004-12-20 Thread Christian Perrier
shadow 4.0.3-30.5 just hit sid yesterday. As usual, this is a NMU by myself, as Karl Ramm, the maintainer is very discreet since the last 6 months (indeed, my last exchanges with him were after Debconf) and Sam Hartman, his co-maintainer indicated he has no real intent of maintaining this package

Re: Obsolete binaries

2004-12-20 Thread Björn Stenberg
Anthony Towns wrote: Drawing conclusions isn't so bad, but that one's not quite helpful -- you've done all the work, but it all has to be done again in order to actually follow through on the recommendation. There's nothing wrong with that, but it's less helpful than it could be. Right, I

Pushing (frozen) ifupdown (0.6.4-4.10) into sarge?

2004-12-20 Thread Javier Fernández-Sanguino Peña
Ifupdown latest version (0.6.4-4.10) has been out for quite a while (since August) and if includes: translation fixes (#248717, #249233, #247772), documentation fixes (including #259609, #247772, #255218 ) and normal bug fixes (#250713, #245067, #242607, #255228, #121755, #258965, #255574,

Re: Please allow procmail 3.22-10 in testing

2004-12-20 Thread Colin Watson
On Fri, Dec 17, 2004 at 12:24:59PM +0100, Santiago Vila wrote: procmail (3.22-10) unstable; urgency=low * Modified autoconf to hardcode 127.0.0.1 as the address for localhost, instead of taking the value from the machine on which the package is being built. Reported by Stephen

workman in testing

2004-12-20 Thread Volker Ossenkopf
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Hi Andi, as we are getting closer to the sarge release, I have to ask you to try to manually force the latest workman package into sarge. Since version 1.3.4-17 the package is in a deadlock situation, because the ia64 support was removed due to the

Re: Obsolete binaries

2004-12-20 Thread Jeroen van Wolffelaar
On Mon, Dec 20, 2004 at 06:43:28AM +0100, Goswin von Brederlow wrote: Jeroen van Wolffelaar [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: http://ftp-master.wolffelaar.nl/removals.html Do you want the scripts from buildd.net (or rewrites thereof like Igloos page) too? That'd be a nice addition to

Re: Pushing (frozen) ifupdown (0.6.4-4.10) into sarge?

2004-12-20 Thread Marco d'Itri
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I know this package has been frozen but, since this package has been widely tested, and there are no RC bugs, could it be considered a candidate for moving into sarge? If this could be done then a new netbase version (4.20?) could be uploaded Seconded. -- ciao, Marco

Please approve doc-linux 2004.11-1

2004-12-20 Thread Frank Lichtenheld
Hi. doc-linux 2004.11-1 is in unstable for 20 days and only contains the usual monthly update stuff. Please approve it for sarge. Gruesse, -- Frank Lichtenheld [EMAIL PROTECTED] www: http://www.djpig.de/

Re: Please approve doc-linux 2004.11-1

2004-12-20 Thread Colin Watson
On Mon, Dec 20, 2004 at 05:32:40PM +0100, Frank Lichtenheld wrote: doc-linux 2004.11-1 is in unstable for 20 days and only contains the usual monthly update stuff. Please approve it for sarge. Approved. Cheers, -- Colin Watson [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Please consider lzo 1.08-2 for sarge

2004-12-20 Thread Peter Eisentraut
The -2 release of lzo 1.08 (frozen) was a packaging cleanup, which I never really intended to go into sarge considering the expected timeline back then. But now I feel that it has waited long enough that it might as well be pushed into sarge, in the interest of having everything on the same

Please requeue libapache-mod-auth-pgsql

2004-12-20 Thread Andrew Pollock
Hello, Could you please requeue libapache-mod-auth-pgsql for building? Currently, the grave bug #282309 is still affecting testing, as the package hasn't propagated to testing yet. regards Andrew -- linux.conf.au 2005 - http://lca2005.linux.org.au/ - Birthplace of Tux April 18th to 23rd