Re: Please accept sarg-2.0.7-1 in sarge

2005-05-08 Thread Steve Langasek
On Sun, May 08, 2005 at 12:04:25AM +0200, Luigi Gangitano wrote: Il giorno mer, 04/05/2005 alle 19.04 -0700, Steve Langasek ha scritto: Can you explain the impact of this segfault? While generating the index file parsing directories if the month string is longer than 3 char a strncpy

Re: gnupg RC bugs

2005-05-08 Thread Marc Haber
Hi, On Sun, May 08, 2005 at 12:36:12AM -0700, Steve Langasek wrote: On Sun, May 08, 2005 at 01:59:01AM +0200, Norbert Tretkowski wrote: * Steve Langasek wrote: On Sat, May 07, 2005 at 04:12:05PM +0200, Norbert Tretkowski wrote: Looks like James is no longer interested in maintaining

Re: autofs 4.1.4 in sarge

2005-05-08 Thread Steve Langasek
Hi Steinar, On Thu, May 05, 2005 at 06:53:41PM +0200, Steinar H. Gunderson wrote: On Thu, May 05, 2005 at 01:48:02PM -0300, Daniel Andre Vaquero wrote: Is there any chance of considering an upload of autofs 4.1.4 to sarge, now that it is frozen? Version 4.1.4 + the patches from kernel.org

Re: Can nagios-plugins 1.4-4 enter testing?

2005-05-08 Thread Steve Langasek
Hi Guido, On Sat, May 07, 2005 at 05:26:38PM -0700, Steve Langasek wrote: On Sat, May 07, 2005 at 04:45:29PM -0700, Guido Trotter wrote: On Sat, May 07, 2005 at 03:29:49PM -0700, Steve Langasek wrote: Mmm, you can contact [EMAIL PROTECTED] to ask for it to be looked at; I don't know

Please let mp3burn back to sarge

2005-05-08 Thread Alexander Wirt
Hi, due to the fact that I missed to downgrade a bug (#289822), mp3burn got removed from sarge. I don't think thats a bug in mp3burn, maybe in cdrecord, but I'm not able to reproduce it. mp3burn works fine for me and others. So I would be pleased if you could put it back to sarge. Best wishes

Please consider bzip2 1.0.2-6 for sarge

2005-05-08 Thread Anibal Monsalve Salazar
Hello, Please consider bzip2 1.0.2-6 for sarge. It fixes security vulnerability CAN-2005-0953 (RC bug #303300). Changes: bzip2 (1.0.2-6) unstable; urgency=high . * Fixed RC bug file permissions modification race (CAN-2005-0953), closes: #303300. Patch by Santiago Ruano Rincon [EMAIL

Re: gtkmathview 0.6.5, is it possible to accept it in sarge?

2005-05-08 Thread Steve Langasek
Hi Stefano, On Sun, May 08, 2005 at 11:21:00AM +0200, Stefano Zacchiroli wrote: On Wed, May 04, 2005 at 11:41:53PM -0700, Steve Langasek wrote: Is it possible to accept gtkmathview 0.6.5 in testing? Very much a border case, but approved. Sorry for disturbing you again, but I failed to

Re: Please consider bzip2 1.0.2-6 for sarge

2005-05-08 Thread Steve Langasek
On Sun, May 08, 2005 at 07:33:41PM +1000, Anibal Monsalve Salazar wrote: Please consider bzip2 1.0.2-6 for sarge. It fixes security vulnerability CAN-2005-0953 (RC bug #303300). Approved. Thanks, -- Steve Langasek postmodern programmer signature.asc Description: Digital signature

Re: Please let mp3burn back to sarge

2005-05-08 Thread Steve Langasek
Hi Alexander, On Sun, May 08, 2005 at 10:22:18AM +0200, Alexander Wirt wrote: due to the fact that I missed to downgrade a bug (#289822), mp3burn got removed from sarge. I don't think thats a bug in mp3burn, maybe in cdrecord, but I'm not able to reproduce it. mp3burn works fine for me and

Re: autofs 4.1.4 in sarge

2005-05-08 Thread Steinar H. Gunderson
On Sun, May 08, 2005 at 12:46:03AM -0700, Steve Langasek wrote: Well, at least one user seems to think that 304245 is important enough to be worth fixing; if you agree with him, then it's fine to allow this fix in via unstable. That wouldn't apply to whatever low-priority fixes upstream has

please move whois and ppp to sarge

2005-05-08 Thread Marco d'Itri
whois (4.7.4) unstable; urgency=high * Implemented the new b, B and G flags of the RIPE server. * Updated the version number. (Closes: #304395) * Updated the .dm, .nf, .tl, .tp TLD servers. * Added new IPv4 and ASN allocations for Afrinic. (Closes: #306525) * Added new IPv6 allocations.

Please allow updating of Synaptic

2005-05-08 Thread Michael Vogt
Dear Release Team, please consider updating synaptic for debian/sarge. The current version in unstable fix a bug in the History window that may result in showing incorrect dates. It also contains new Macedonian and Xhosa translations and various translation updates. I uploaded the version into

Re: autofs 4.1.4 in sarge

2005-05-08 Thread Steve Langasek
On Sun, May 08, 2005 at 12:17:44PM +0200, Steinar H. Gunderson wrote: On Sun, May 08, 2005 at 12:46:03AM -0700, Steve Langasek wrote: Well, at least one user seems to think that 304245 is important enough to be worth fixing; if you agree with him, then it's fine to allow this fix in via

Please consider asterisk-spandsp-plugins for sarge (Re: packages missing from sarge)

2005-05-08 Thread Paul Cupis
Joey Hess wrote: [snip] asterisk-spandsp-plugins I've just upload a 0-day NMU for this to fix bug #305624. Please consider allowing the fixed version back into sarge. Regards, Paul Cupis -- [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe.

Re: Please allow updating of Synaptic

2005-05-08 Thread Steve Langasek
Hi Michael, On Sun, May 08, 2005 at 12:23:18PM +0200, Michael Vogt wrote: please consider updating synaptic for debian/sarge. The current version in unstable fix a bug in the History window that may result in showing incorrect dates. It also contains new Macedonian and Xhosa translations and

Re: please move whois and ppp to sarge

2005-05-08 Thread Steve Langasek
On Sun, May 08, 2005 at 12:36:01PM +0200, Marco d'Itri wrote: whois (4.7.4) unstable; urgency=high * Implemented the new b, B and G flags of the RIPE server. * Updated the version number. (Closes: #304395) * Updated the .dm, .nf, .tl, .tp TLD servers. * Added new IPv4 and ASN

Please consider blootbot (1.2.0-1) for Sarge

2005-05-08 Thread Neil McGovern
Hi all, Blootbot 1.1.0 was originally removed from Sarge[1] due to bug #228053. This has been fixed in version 1.2.0-1 (along with quite a few others), which is sitting in unstable at the moment. Could this be hinted for inclusion? I know it's not high priority, but it would be nice to see this

Re: please push lvm2_2.01.04-5 into testing

2005-05-08 Thread Steve Langasek
On Thu, Apr 28, 2005 at 06:05:32AM -0400, Andres Salomon wrote: lvm2_2.01.04-5 contains a single fix (for a FTBFS on amd64; #298762). Please consider pushing it into sarge. This is in, BTW. udebs still need to be synced. -- Steve Langasek postmodern programmer signature.asc Description:

Re: packages missing from sarge

2005-05-08 Thread Steve Langasek
On Sun, May 08, 2005 at 12:21:05PM +0200, Julien Cristau wrote: On 08/05/2005-10:35, Joey Hess wrote: ocaml-getopt According to [1], this package was removed because of bug#306074, which is now fixed. ocaml-getopt in unstable is now 12 days old, so I think it can be allowed back in

please consider ncurses-ruby 0.9.2-2

2005-05-08 Thread Michael Ablassmeier
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 hi, Description: libncurses-ruby - ruby Extension for the ncurses C library libncurses-ruby1.8 - ruby Extension for the ncurses C library Changes: ncurses-ruby (0.9.2-2) unstable; urgency=high . * Fix FTBFS Closes: #307338 * Small update

Please allow ndtpd for sarge (Re: packages missing from sarge)

2005-05-08 Thread Kenshi Muto
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Dear release managers, At Sat, 7 May 2005 21:03:19 -0400, Joey Hess wrote: So here is a list (from update-excuses) of all 491 packages that is being held out of sarge[1]. If you've already done all you can on the RC bugs on packages in sarge, take

Re: please consider ncurses-ruby 0.9.2-2

2005-05-08 Thread Colin Watson
On Sun, May 08, 2005 at 02:57:32PM +0200, Michael Ablassmeier wrote: Description: libncurses-ruby - ruby Extension for the ncurses C library libncurses-ruby1.8 - ruby Extension for the ncurses C library Changes: ncurses-ruby (0.9.2-2) unstable; urgency=high . * Fix FTBFS Closes:

please review ruby1.8_1.8.2-7

2005-05-08 Thread akira yamada / やまだあきら
On 2005/05/08, at 8:02, Steve Langasek wrote: It is not helpful to everyone else when the release team is spending its time reviewing low-priority changes instead of working on release- critical problems. I understood. I tried to reduce the patch and made ruby1.8_1.8.2-7. It is in unstable.

Re: Please consider asterisk-spandsp-plugins for sarge (Re: packages missing from sarge)

2005-05-08 Thread Joey Hess
Paul Cupis wrote: Joey Hess wrote: [snip] asterisk-spandsp-plugins I've just upload a 0-day NMU for this to fix bug #305624. Please consider allowing the fixed version back into sarge. Approved with the usual testing delay. -- see shy jo signature.asc Description: Digital signature

Re: Accepted ethereal 0.10.10-2sarge1 (i386 source)

2005-05-08 Thread Frederic Peters
Steve Langasek wrote: The changelog claims to fix infinite loop problems with the DSLw dissector and a double-free in the ICEP dissector, but here is the entire diff for those two source files: diff -u ethereal-0.10.10/epan/dissectors/packet-dlsw.c

Re: Please allow ndtpd for sarge (Re: packages missing from sarge)

2005-05-08 Thread Joey Hess
Kenshi Muto wrote: ndtpd_3.1.5-6.2 in sid already fixed RC bugs by my NMU. Could you accept this again? I've NMUed ndtpd_3.1.5-6.1 for fix RC bug#301672 just before freeze. I found 6.1 and older version had still forgotten to apply debian/02_fix_for_old_automake.dpatch to fix #301672

Re: Can nagios-plugins 1.4-4 enter testing?

2005-05-08 Thread Guido Trotter
On Sun, May 08, 2005 at 01:13:48AM -0700, Steve Langasek wrote: Hi, Er, except I was expecting you to change this build-dependency to point at the *current* libmysqlclient dev package: Wooops... Sorry, I fixed that with -6, uploaded now (luckily in time for today's queue run)! Thanks,

Re: Please allow ndtpd for sarge (Re: packages missing from sarge)

2005-05-08 Thread Joey Hess
Joey Hess wrote: config.sub/config.guess? I realize it's likely only new versions, but it makes reviewing this package hard. The changelog also doesn't mention the why debian/patches/02_fix_for_old_automake.dpatch was modified to remove changes to lib/fakelog.c and src/ndtpd.c. Sorry, I seem

doc++ 3.4.10-3.1 NMU

2005-05-08 Thread Matej Vela
Hi, I've uploaded an NMU for doc++ which fixes the FTBFS bug (#292337) along with some minor issues. Patch attached. Cheers, Matej --- doc++-3.4.10.dist/debian/changelog 2005-05-08 16:39:59.0 +0200 +++ doc++-3.4.10/debian/changelog 2005-05-08 18:07:53.0 +0200 @@ -1,3

Re: Please allow ndtpd for sarge (Re: packages missing from sarge)

2005-05-08 Thread ISHIKAWA Mutsumi
In [EMAIL PROTECTED] Joey Hess [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: The changelog also doesn't mention the why debian/patches/02_fix_for_old_automake.dpatch was modified to remove changes to lib/fakelog.c and src/ndtpd.c. Perhaps, in the mistake when the dpatch is generated old

evolution 2.0.4-2

2005-05-08 Thread Joey Hess
I reviewed evolution 2.0.4-2 in t-p-u since it fixes a security hole, as well as an important bug (#280303), but I'm not comfortable with all the other changes in this patch: - Several apparently minor translation changes, which I am not qualified to review, and which are not mentioned in the

logwatch 5.2.2-6

2005-05-08 Thread Willi Mann
Hi! Please consider logwatch 5.2.2-6 for sarge. The changes are minimal and attached. thanks Willi diff -u logwatch-5.2.2/debian/changelog logwatch-5.2.2/debian/changelog --- logwatch-5.2.2/debian/changelog +++ logwatch-5.2.2/debian/changelog @@ -1,3 +1,12 @@ +logwatch (5.2.2-6) unstable;

Proposed fix for ld.so assertion failures for sarge

2005-05-08 Thread Daniel Jacobowitz
At the bottom of this message is a diff against glibc 2.3.2.ds1-21 which fixes merged bugs 207872, 210840, 274852, and 276384. I spoke with Colin on IRC and he seemed amenable to this as a last-minute fix for sarge. Does anyone else have an opinion? Are there any other bugs vital enough to fix

kronolith minor updates with language translations

2005-05-08 Thread Ola Lundqvist
Hello I have updated kronolith package with two more language additions for debconf messages. Please let that go though. As I have understood such uploads is acceptable. kronolith (1.1.4-2) unstable; urgency=low * Fixed grammar error, closes: #273190. * Added Czech translation of debconf

Re: bugzilla 2.18-6, sarge candidate

2005-05-08 Thread Moritz Muehlenhoff
In gmane.linux.debian.devel.release, you wrote: Users ask for many things that it's not feasible for us to give them. The fact is that the diff between 2.16.7-5 and 2.18-6 is 197,000 lines I totally agree that RMs have your procedures, and I believe that I cannot change your decision

Please let ekg 1.5+20050411-2 into sarge

2005-05-08 Thread Marcin Owsiany
Changelog: ] * Applied patches selected from upstream CVS, to fix the following ]important issues in libgadu: ] - incorrect type punning could cause undefined behavior ] - assigning syscall return values to unsigned variable makes error ] conditions undetectable in some

Bug#307042: classworlds: FTBFS: Missing Build-Depends on 'junit'

2005-05-08 Thread Matej Vela
On Sat, Apr 30, 2005 at 10:55:54AM +0200, Andreas Jochens wrote: Package: classworlds Version: 1.0.1-1 Severity: serious Tags: patch The package FTBFS in a clean chroot environment because a Build-Depends on 'junit' is missing. [...] Fixed in NMU classworlds 1.0.1-1.1 (diff attached).

Please consider gnump3d-2.9.3-2 for Sarge.

2005-05-08 Thread Steve Kemp
This release fixes a serious bug which renders all the 'info' links in the HTML output as broken. Whilst it wasn't reported in the BTS it was repeatedly reported upstream. (I uploaded this revision at priority 'medium'. Had it been 'high' it would have made it in!) No rebuilding is

gimp-help package for sarge

2005-05-08 Thread Ari Pollak
Hi, I've just uploaded gimp-help 2+0.7-5 to unstable, which fixes RC bug #308228. I'd like this to go into sarge, since it only contains a minor change, fixing a typo in the gimp-help-zh-cn.doc-base file. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble?

trackballs update for sarge

2005-05-08 Thread Ari Pollak
Hi again, I just uploaded trackballs 1.0.0-10 to unstable, which fixes bug #302454, a severity:important and minor security issue, so I'd like to get this into sarge. An interdiff between revisions -9 and -10 is attached. diff -u trackballs-1.0.0/config.guess trackballs-1.0.0/config.guess ---

Please allow kernel-patch-skas into sarge

2005-05-08 Thread Andrew Pollock
Hi again, I've just NMUed kernel-patch-skas with a patch for 2.6.8 (previously it didn't contain a patch for the kernel that will be in Sarge). This addresses #281554, and possibly #276993 (Steve, I'll take your advice on whether #276993 should be considered fixed or not) regards Andrew

please consider allowing atomix into sarge

2005-05-08 Thread Guilherme de S. Pastore
Hi, Release Team! =) A new CVS snapshot of atomix had been uploaded almost 10 days before the freeze, and was waiting to go into sarge. The only difference between the last version in sarge and the CVS snapshot was a fix for a rather annoying bug, although not serious. Fortunately or not, the

Re: Please allow ndtpd for sarge (Re: packages missing from sarge)

2005-05-08 Thread Kenshi Muto
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Hi, At Mon, 09 May 2005 01:43:54 +0900, ISHIKAWA Mutsumi wrote: In [EMAIL PROTECTED] Joey Hess [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: The changelog also doesn't mention the why debian/patches/02_fix_for_old_automake.dpatch was modified to remove

Re: Bug#308231: marked as done (file conflict in libqwt-doc,libccrtp-dev)

2005-05-08 Thread Steve Langasek
On Sun, May 08, 2005 at 04:03:20PM -0700, Debian Bug Tracking System wrote: Format: 1.7 Date: Sun, 8 May 2005 15:01:15 -0700 Source: libqwt Binary: libqwt-doc libqwt-dev libqwt4 Architecture: source all i386 Version: 4.2.0-2 Distribution: unstable Urgency: high Maintainer: Brian Nelson

Re: Bug#307316: marked as done (mypasswordsafe: FTBFS: Makefile:45: *** Recursive variable `USER' references itself (eventually))

2005-05-08 Thread Steve Langasek
On Sun, May 08, 2005 at 04:18:08PM -0700, Debian Bug Tracking System wrote: Format: 1.7 Date: Fri, 6 May 2005 20:25:12 +0200 Source: mypasswordsafe Binary: mypasswordsafe Architecture: source i386 Version: 0.0.20041004-2 Distribution: unstable Urgency: low Maintainer: Khalid El Fathi

Are you still fat?

2005-05-08 Thread Herbert Barnard
Title: fest courier antisemite pentecostal Finally, it`s Hoodia! more info... loretta sprint candela climatology hanley erode etruscan conjugal grindstone paper bogy reminiscent davis stair ocular neural realm gluing airspace sweden no -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: Please update argus in sarge

2005-05-08 Thread Steve Langasek
On Mon, May 09, 2005 at 09:40:58AM +1000, Andrew Pollock wrote: Hi release team! I've just made an upload of argus, which closes #308242 and #308211 Could you please allow this into sarge? Approved. Thanks, -- Steve Langasek postmodern programmer signature.asc Description: Digital

[EMAIL PROTECTED]: e2fsprogs_1.35-8sarge1_alpha.changes UNACCEPT]

2005-05-08 Thread Theodore Ts'o
I'm getting a half-dozen or so of these messages every 24 hours. It sounds like something is continuously trying to resubmit the 1.35-8sarge1 versions of e2fsprogs into sarge. Could you either remove them, or tell me who I need to talk to in order to get these erroneously NMU'ed binary packages

Re: Please allow mysql (4.0.24-8, 4.1.11-3) into Sarge!

2005-05-08 Thread Steve Langasek
Hi Christian, On Sun, May 08, 2005 at 05:06:33PM +0200, Christian Hammers wrote: Please let mysql-dfsg (4.0.24-8) and mysql-dfsg-4.1 (4.1.11-3) into testing. Both were blocked during the free announcement by bug #307473 which could lead to the accidental remove of all mysql databases if one