Re: Processed: Fixed in NMU of zopectl 0.3.4.3

2005-05-14 Thread Steve Langasek
On Sat, May 14, 2005 at 03:19:11PM -0700, Debian Bug Tracking System wrote: > > tag 309001 + fixed > Bug#309001: file conflict with zope from woody > There were no tags set. > Tags added: fixed Approved for testing. BTW, the changelog and the control file disagree about which version's being rep

Re: egroupware 1.0.0.007-2.dfsg-2 for sarge

2005-05-14 Thread Steve Langasek
Hi Peter, On Sat, May 14, 2005 at 12:51:19PM +0200, Peter Eisentraut wrote: > Please allow egroupware 1.0.0.007-2.dfsg-2 into sarge. This is a > one-line change to repair the calendar display in konqueror, which is > unusable without this. > egroupware (1.0.0.007-2.dfsg-2) unstable; urgency=me

Re: update for kernel-patch-grsecurity2

2005-05-14 Thread Laszlo Boszormenyi
Hi Vorlon, On Sat, 2005-05-14 at 15:59 -0700, Steve Langasek wrote: > > The update would be for the new (security related) kernel versions, as > > upstream updated the grsecurity2 patch for that, no other changes done. > > Would it be accepted for Sarge? > > What new kernel versions are you refer

Re: Please consider noflushd 2.7.5-1 for sarge.

2005-05-14 Thread Steve Langasek
Hi Daniel, On Fri, May 13, 2005 at 05:54:01PM +0200, Daniel Kobras wrote: > I've recently uploaded noflushd 2.7.5-1 with two fixes that I consider > appropriate for sarge once it has aged: > * The changes to src/disk_stat.c fix a startup crash of the daemon when > software raids or LVM arrays a

Re: [EMAIL PROTECTED]: iptables sarge release]

2005-05-14 Thread Steve Langasek
On Sat, May 14, 2005 at 10:22:07PM -0500, Laurence J. Lane wrote: > There are a couple of iptables bugs that missed the standard > freeze. #283822 in particular is scripting error that causes > a FTBFS when using a dash (and probably other shells) instead > of bash. > iptables (1.2.11-10) unsta

Re: Bug#306765: marked as done (inn2 - fails to upgrade)

2005-05-14 Thread Steve Langasek
> Format: 1.7 > Date: Sat, 14 May 2005 15:03:56 +0200 > Source: inn2 > Binary: inn2-inews inn2 inn2-ssl inn2-dev > Architecture: source i386 > Version: 2.4.2-3 > Distribution: unstable > Urgency: high > Maintainer: Marco d'Itri <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Changed-By: Marco d'Itri <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > De

[EMAIL PROTECTED]: iptables sarge release]

2005-05-14 Thread Laurence J. Lane
--- Begin Message --- Hi, There are a couple of iptables bugs that missed the standard freeze. #283822 in particular is scripting error that causes a FTBFS when using a dash (and probably other shells) instead of bash. iptables (1.2.11-10) unstable; urgency=medium * fixed scripts/prep.s

Re: Please consider quantlib_0.3.9 (and -ruby,-python,-doc) for testing

2005-05-14 Thread Steve Langasek
On Sat, May 14, 2005 at 08:19:17PM -0500, Dirk Eddelbuettel wrote: > > On 14 May 2005 at 20:04, Dirk Eddelbuettel wrote: > | > | On 14 May 2005 at 17:45, Steve Langasek wrote: > | | > I guess I wasn't sufficiently clear. 0.1.11 is _broken_ as it needs QL > 0.3.8. > | | > Given that we settled on

Re: Please consider quantlib_0.3.9 (and -ruby,-python,-doc) for testing

2005-05-14 Thread Dirk Eddelbuettel
On 14 May 2005 at 20:04, Dirk Eddelbuettel wrote: | | On 14 May 2005 at 17:45, Steve Langasek wrote: | | > I guess I wasn't sufficiently clear. 0.1.11 is _broken_ as it needs QL 0.3.8. | | > Given that we settled on QL 0.3.9 we do need 0.1.12. See below for a log. | | | | Ah. Please fix the m

Re: Please consider quantlib_0.3.9 (and -ruby,-python,-doc) for testing

2005-05-14 Thread Dirk Eddelbuettel
On 14 May 2005 at 17:45, Steve Langasek wrote: | > I guess I wasn't sufficiently clear. 0.1.11 is _broken_ as it needs QL 0.3.8. | > Given that we settled on QL 0.3.9 we do need 0.1.12. See below for a log. | | Ah. Please fix the missing dependency on quantlib, then, and I'll push it | in. Ye

gwrapguile: Question about suitability of changes for sarge

2005-05-14 Thread Andreas Rottmann
[Resent message, first one seemingly didn't get thru] Hi! I prepared an upload for gwrapguile and fix #308499. The changelog looks like this: * Move /usr/bin/g-wrap-config to libgwrapguile-dev (closes: #308499). * Include manpage for g-wrap-config. * Make libgwrapguile-dev depend on guile,

Re: proposing a gcc-3.3 upload to testing-proposed-updates

2005-05-14 Thread Daniel Jacobowitz
On Sun, May 15, 2005 at 12:04:02AM +0200, Matthias Klose wrote: > Daniel Jacobowitz writes: > > On Sat, May 14, 2005 at 10:52:23PM +0200, Matthias Klose wrote: > > Content-Description: message body text > > > I'm proposing the following updates for gcc-3.3 for testing: > > > > > > gcc-3.3 (1:3.3.5

Re: Please consider quantlib_0.3.9 (and -ruby,-python,-doc) for testing

2005-05-14 Thread Steve Langasek
On Sat, May 14, 2005 at 08:12:54AM -0500, Dirk Eddelbuettel wrote: > | > | think we'll want to update those if it's not necessary. Likewise, it > | > | doesn't sound like r-cran-rquantlib needs updating. > | > Well yes -- 0.1.11 corresponded to the 0.3.8 we are replacing in testing. > So > | > 0

Re: [Fwd: webmagick_2.02-7.1_i386.changes ACCEPTED]

2005-05-14 Thread Frank Lichtenheld
On Sat, May 14, 2005 at 04:49:41PM +0300, Lars Wirzenius wrote: > I have made a non-maintainer upload to unstable of webmagick to fix bug > #308755 (Build-Depends on dropped perl-transitional package), using the > patch by Russ Allbery in the bug log. Attached is the source diff > (debdiff of .dsc)

Re: Please accept mailleds_0.93-11 for Sarge

2005-05-14 Thread Frank Lichtenheld
On Sat, May 14, 2005 at 11:29:13PM +0200, Dennis Stampfer wrote: > Please accept mailleds_0.93-11 for testing to fix bug #308612: Hmm, that doesn't look right, does it? Files in second .deb but not in first - /usr/share/man/man1/xmailleds.1.gz Files in first .

Re: review dgen/1.23-7

2005-05-14 Thread Frank Lichtenheld
On Sat, May 14, 2005 at 05:15:22PM +0100, Hanna M. Wallach wrote: > Now done in the version of fondu (0.0.20041222-2) just > uploaded. Interdiff output attached. Approved Gruesse, -- Frank Lichtenheld <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> www: http://www.djpig.de/ -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: gwrapguile: Question about suitability of changes for sarge

2005-05-14 Thread Steve Langasek
Hi Rotty, On Sat, May 14, 2005 at 03:03:14PM +0200, Andreas Rottmann wrote: > I prepared an upload for gwrapguile and fix #308499. The changelog > looks like this: > * Move /usr/bin/g-wrap-config to libgwrapguile-dev (closes: #308499). > * Include manpage for g-wrap-config. > * Make libgwr

Re: update for kernel-patch-grsecurity2

2005-05-14 Thread Steve Langasek
Hi Laszlo, On Sat, May 14, 2005 at 02:48:32PM +0200, Laszlo Boszormenyi wrote: > I need an update for kernel-patch-grsecurity2 (in Sarge currently). > The update would be for the new (security related) kernel versions, as > upstream updated the grsecurity2 patch for that, no other changes done. >

Re: proposing a gcc-3.3 upload to testing-proposed-updates

2005-05-14 Thread Matthias Klose
Daniel Jacobowitz writes: > On Sat, May 14, 2005 at 10:52:23PM +0200, Matthias Klose wrote: > Content-Description: message body text > > I'm proposing the following updates for gcc-3.3 for testing: > > > > gcc-3.3 (1:3.3.5-13) testing-proposed-updates; urgency=low > > > > * Disable running the

Re: proposing a gcc-3.3 upload to testing-proposed-updates

2005-05-14 Thread Daniel Jacobowitz
On Sat, May 14, 2005 at 10:52:23PM +0200, Matthias Klose wrote: Content-Description: message body text > I'm proposing the following updates for gcc-3.3 for testing: > > gcc-3.3 (1:3.3.5-13) testing-proposed-updates; urgency=low > > * Disable running the boehm-gc testsuite on hppa. Hangs the bu

Re: RC bug notes

2005-05-14 Thread Russ Allbery
Steve Langasek <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > You may find this page provides a more exact (and also more flexible) list > of RC bugs affecting sarge: > http://bts.turmzimmer.net/details.php?ignore=sid&new=5 Oh, yes, this is fantastic. Thank you for the pointer! -- Russ Allbery ([EMAIL PROTE

Please accept mailleds_0.93-11 for Sarge

2005-05-14 Thread Dennis Stampfer
Hi! Please accept mailleds_0.93-11 for testing to fix bug #308612: #308612: xmailleds dies after a while Severity: important; http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=308612 The fix in the source is very simple. debian/copyright was corrected in a small way which

Re: RC bug notes

2005-05-14 Thread Steve Langasek
Hi Russ, Thanks for your patching work. On Sat, May 14, 2005 at 08:53:36AM -0700, Russ Allbery wrote: > Frank Lichtenheld <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > On Fri, May 13, 2005 at 09:09:36PM -0700, Russ Allbery wrote: > >> Hope this was helpful. > > Very much appreciated. But you can save yoursel

proposing a gcc-3.3 upload to testing-proposed-updates

2005-05-14 Thread Matthias Klose
I'm proposing the following updates for gcc-3.3 for testing: gcc-3.3 (1:3.3.5-13) testing-proposed-updates; urgency=low * Disable running the boehm-gc testsuite on hppa. Hangs the buildd's on some builds. Sometimes seen on the buildd's. Conditionally done for hppa, should not affect the ot

Re: Pushing gtk+2.0 (2.6.4-2)

2005-05-14 Thread Adam Thornton
On May 14, 2005, at 3:05 PM, Bastian Blank wrote: I assume the buildd will automatically requeue the package; any recommendation as to an action which would help the buildd maintainers, though? No, it does not and I marked it as failed. If the buildd is at OSDL, I can ask for more disk space fo

Re: Any news on bug #255367: missing pptp-linux from first CD ?

2005-05-14 Thread Ola Lundqvist
Hello On Sat, May 14, 2005 at 06:46:37PM +0300, Lior Kaplan wrote: > Hi, > > I'm querying about this bug since it prevents users of some countries to > have Internet access using the netinstall. The report lists: Austria, > Italy & Israel. > > More info at http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugrepor

Re: Pushing gtk+2.0 (2.6.4-2)

2005-05-14 Thread Bastian Blank
On Sat, May 14, 2005 at 04:27:10PM -0300, Gustavo Noronha Silva wrote: > 2.6.4-2 is not a good comparison base, because it was mistakenly built > with static stuff disabled. Err, the "static stuff" needs more than 2GiB to build? > I assume the buildd will automatically requeue the package; any >

Re: Pushing gtk+2.0 (2.6.4-2)

2005-05-14 Thread Gustavo Noronha Silva
Em Sex, 2005-05-13 Ãs 17:58 +0200, Bastian Blank escreveu: > On Thu, May 12, 2005 at 09:12:49PM -0300, Gustavo Noronha Silva wrote: > > 2.6.4-3 is now in the pool and has been built by some arches already; > > the changes are now only the ones refered to in the -2 changelog, with > > all the uninte

Please accept squid_2.5.9-9 in sarge

2005-05-14 Thread Luigi Gangitano
Hi RMs, as suggested by Frank Lichtenheld, I uploaded a new version of squid with just two patches fixing critical bugs: http://www.squid-cache.org/Versions/v2/2.5/bugs/#squid-2.5.STABLE9-dns_query security issue with DNS response spoofing http://www.squid-cache.org/Versions/v2/2.5/bugs/#squid-2

Re: that the restaurant

2005-05-14 Thread Anthony Meier
You're Invited Thanks to a private nomination, there are potentially three deals that will be offered to you. Notice - past credit history is NOT a factor for this promotion as long as we recieve word from you within 36 hours. In accordance with our terms please verify your information on

Re: review dgen/1.23-7

2005-05-14 Thread Hanna M. Wallach
On Fri, 13 May 2005 20:53:16 -0400, Joey Hess wrote: > Frank Lichtenheld wrote: > > Since dgen is also present in woody, fondu will additonaly need > > a conflict against older versions of dgen, am I correct? > > Yes that's a good point. Now done in the version of fondu (0.0.20041222-2) just uplo

Any news on bug #255367: missing pptp-linux from first CD ?

2005-05-14 Thread Lior Kaplan
Hi, I'm querying about this bug since it prevents users of some countries to have Internet access using the netinstall. The report lists: Austria, Italy & Israel. More info at http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=255367 popcon stats : http://qa.debian.org/developer.php?popcon=pptp-li

Re: RC bug notes

2005-05-14 Thread Russ Allbery
Frank Lichtenheld <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > On Fri, May 13, 2005 at 09:09:36PM -0700, Russ Allbery wrote: >> Hope this was helpful. > Very much appreciated. But you can save yourself some time by checking > if the package in question is in testing at all. e.g. doc-rfc-3000-3999, > gutenbrowse

Re: Please consider quantlib_0.3.9 (and -ruby,-python,-doc) for testing

2005-05-14 Thread Dirk Eddelbuettel
Jeroen, On 14 May 2005 at 15:40, Jeroen van Wolffelaar wrote: | On Sat, May 14, 2005 at 08:12:54AM -0500, Dirk Eddelbuettel wrote: | > I guess I wasn't sufficiently clear. 0.1.11 is _broken_ as it needs QL 0.3.8. | > Given that we settled on QL 0.3.9 we do need 0.1.12. See below for a log. | |

Re: Upgrading to postgresql bug fix release 7.4.8

2005-05-14 Thread Martin Pitt
Hi again! Martin Pitt [2005-05-12 21:40 +0200]: > I'm currently fixing some important (and other) bugs in the postgresql > package, which I'd like to see in Sarge. I'll mail the details when > the package is ready, but so far I wanted to ask whether you would > accept the new usptream version 7.4.

Re: Please update blackbox and bbkeys into testing.

2005-05-14 Thread Bruno Barrera C.
On Fri, 2005-05-13 at 14:53 -0700, Steve Langasek wrote: > On Fri, May 13, 2005 at 11:45:15AM -0400, Bruno Barrera C. wrote: > > Not at those versions new versions. We are in a *freeze*. > > You can either have the old versions in sarge, or you can ask to have them > removed. Argh, that's bad.

[Fwd: webmagick_2.02-7.1_i386.changes ACCEPTED]

2005-05-14 Thread Lars Wirzenius
I have made a non-maintainer upload to unstable of webmagick to fix bug #308755 (Build-Depends on dropped perl-transitional package), using the patch by Russ Allbery in the bug log. Attached is the source diff (debdiff of .dsc) between the old package (in sarge and sid) and my upload. Release mana

Re: Please consider quantlib_0.3.9 (and -ruby,-python,-doc) for testing

2005-05-14 Thread Jeroen van Wolffelaar
On Sat, May 14, 2005 at 08:12:54AM -0500, Dirk Eddelbuettel wrote: > I guess I wasn't sufficiently clear. 0.1.11 is _broken_ as it needs QL 0.3.8. > Given that we settled on QL 0.3.9 we do need 0.1.12. See below for a log. Why isn't this reflected in the dependencies then? Dependencies are there

Re: Please consider quantlib_0.3.9 (and -ruby,-python,-doc) for testing

2005-05-14 Thread Dirk Eddelbuettel
(Removed Rick as this is no longer relevant for m68k) On 14 May 2005 at 03:57, Steve Langasek wrote: | On Fri, May 13, 2005 at 09:34:11PM -0500, Dirk Eddelbuettel wrote: | | > | Anyway, the changes for quantlib itself are trivial, and as discussed | > | previously, quantlib-ruby and quantlib-pyt

gwrapguile: Question about suitability of changes for sarge

2005-05-14 Thread Andreas Rottmann
Hi! I prepared an upload for gwrapguile and fix #308499. The changelog looks like this: * Move /usr/bin/g-wrap-config to libgwrapguile-dev (closes: #308499). * Include manpage for g-wrap-config. * Make libgwrapguile-dev depend on guile, since g-wrap-config is a guile script. * g-wrap.

update for kernel-patch-grsecurity2

2005-05-14 Thread Laszlo Boszormenyi
Hi, I need an update for kernel-patch-grsecurity2 (in Sarge currently). The update would be for the new (security related) kernel versions, as upstream updated the grsecurity2 patch for that, no other changes done. Would it be accepted for Sarge? Also I am not sure how the update should be done i

Bug not closed for sarge!

2005-05-14 Thread Jonas Smedegaard
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 reopen 291783 tags 291783 sarge thanks This bug is fixed only for sid, not sarge - and is possibly RC, so should be visible to the release managers, especially now that the fix is trapped by the freeze. - Jonas - -- * Jonas Smedegaard - idealist o

Re: Please consider quantlib_0.3.9 (and -ruby,-python,-doc) for testing

2005-05-14 Thread Steve Langasek
On Fri, May 13, 2005 at 09:34:11PM -0500, Dirk Eddelbuettel wrote: > | Anyway, the changes for quantlib itself are trivial, and as discussed > | previously, quantlib-ruby and quantlib-python need to be brought up-to-date > | to fix a FTBFS problem, so those updates are all ok. Does the same build

egroupware 1.0.0.007-2.dfsg-2 for sarge

2005-05-14 Thread Peter Eisentraut
Please allow egroupware 1.0.0.007-2.dfsg-2 into sarge. This is a one-line change to repair the calendar display in konqueror, which is unusable without this. egroupware (1.0.0.007-2.dfsg-2) unstable; urgency=medium * Fix calendar month display in Konqueror -- Peter Eisentraut <[EMAIL PROTE

Re: RC bug notes

2005-05-14 Thread Frank Lichtenheld
On Fri, May 13, 2005 at 09:09:36PM -0700, Russ Allbery wrote: > Hope this was helpful. Very much appreciated. But you can save yourself some time by checking if the package in question is in testing at all. e.g. doc-rfc-3000-3999, gutenbrowser and erlang aren't :) Gruesse, -- Frank Lichtenheld <

Re: Processing of asterisk-spandsp-plugins_0.0.20050227-1_i386.changes

2005-05-14 Thread Jose Carlos Garcia Sogo
El vie, 13-05-2005 a las 15:33 -0700, Steve Langasek escribiÃ: > On Fri, May 13, 2005 at 07:25:48PM +0200, Kilian Krause wrote: > > Am Freitag, den 13.05.2005, 17:55 +0100 schrieb Paul Cupis: > > > Archive Administrator wrote: > > > > asterisk-spandsp-plugins_0.0.20050227-1_i386.changes uploaded >

Re: Please accept tftp-hpa 0.40-4.1 for Sarge

2005-05-14 Thread Steve Langasek
On Sat, May 14, 2005 at 06:48:29PM +0900, Kenshi Muto wrote: > I've NMUed tftp-hpa 0.40-4.1 for fix missing dependency (release > critical) and improve debconf l10n. I think this update is safe, and you > can see diff from #308688. > Could you approve this version for Sarge? Yes, approved. Thanks

Please accept tftp-hpa 0.40-4.1 for Sarge

2005-05-14 Thread Kenshi Muto
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Hi release managers and Jaakko, I've NMUed tftp-hpa 0.40-4.1 for fix missing dependency (release critical) and improve debconf l10n. I think this update is safe, and you can see diff from #308688. Could you approve this version for Sarge? - -

Re: Please consider Coldsync 3.0+pre3-2 for sarge

2005-05-14 Thread Bradley Marshall
On Sat, May 14, 2005 at 02:36:52AM -0700, Steve Langasek wrote: > So it looks like this change installs the perl module and documentation, but > now doesn't install the conduits that need it? :) Right, I checked to make sure the perl modules were in there, but didn't think I'd touched the other bi

Re: please consider base-config/2.53.9 (t-p-u) for sarge

2005-05-14 Thread Steve Langasek
Hi Joey, On Fri, May 13, 2005 at 09:00:11PM -0400, Joey Hess wrote: > One more base-config upload. This is limited to documentation and > translation fixes, and the broken debconf substitution fixes in the > translations are fairly important too. There are also a couple of > Mirrors.masterlist cha

Re: Please consider Coldsync 3.0+pre3-2 for sarge

2005-05-14 Thread Steve Langasek
Hi Bradley, On Sat, May 14, 2005 at 10:33:42AM +1000, Bradley Marshall wrote: > I've just uploaded Coldsync 3.0+pre3-2, which fixes bug #228793, > the inclusion of Perl modules in the package. This is the only > change I've made to it, and would really appreciate if it could > be let into Sarge,

Re: Please approve openafs 1.3.81-3sarge1

2005-05-14 Thread Steve Langasek
Hi Russ, On Fri, May 13, 2005 at 01:44:52PM -0700, Russ Allbery wrote: > openafs 1.3.81-3sarge1 has been uploaded to testing-proposed-updates. It > fixes one grave error in libpam-openafs-kaserver (#308844) and an annoying > importantish bug in the init script (#305389, #307280, #307797), as well

Re: Please approve python-xmpp

2005-05-14 Thread Steve Langasek
Alexey, On Sat, May 14, 2005 at 08:44:19AM +0400, Alexey Nezhdanov wrote: > This release (0.2-rc3-1) closes the following: > Bug http://bugs.debian.org/307988 : > minor: Compartibility fix in xsend example. > important: Fix in browser to prevent error looping > minor: Fix in browser to ra