Please force in kdeaddons

2006-01-05 Thread Nathanael Nerode
It's just waiting for hppa, like the rest of KDE. :-P force kdeaddons/4:3.4.3-1 -- Nathanael Nerode [EMAIL PROTECTED] [Insert famous quote here] -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: Developer accessible SPARC machine

2006-01-05 Thread Ben Collins
On Thu, 2006-01-05 at 08:06 -0500, Stephen Frost wrote: * Ben Collins ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote: On Wed, 2006-01-04 at 00:22 -0800, Steve Langasek wrote: On Tue, Jan 03, 2006 at 04:35:30PM -0800, Andrew Pollock wrote: I note that one of the issues with the Sparc port is the the lack of a

Re: Build-depends on package not in testing

2006-01-05 Thread Gerrit Pape
On Wed, Jan 04, 2006 at 03:36:00AM -0800, Steve Langasek wrote: reopen 345868 thanks On Wed, Jan 04, 2006 at 10:30:47AM +0100, Gerrit Pape wrote: Unfortunately the discussion about the freecdb package didn't attract my attention earlier, the release critical bug is resolved as invalid

Re: Build-depends on package not in testing

2006-01-05 Thread Kurt Roeckx
On Thu, Jan 05, 2006 at 06:05:28PM +0100, Gerrit Pape wrote: On Wed, Jan 04, 2006 at 03:36:00AM -0800, Steve Langasek wrote: reopen 345868 thanks On Wed, Jan 04, 2006 at 10:30:47AM +0100, Gerrit Pape wrote: Unfortunately the discussion about the freecdb package didn't attract my

Re: Please force in kdeaddons

2006-01-05 Thread Steve Langasek
On Thu, Jan 05, 2006 at 03:43:01AM -0500, Nathanael Nerode wrote: It's just waiting for hppa, like the rest of KDE. :-P force kdeaddons/4:3.4.3-1 Yes, forced. -- Steve Langasek Give me a lever long enough and a Free OS Debian Developer to set it on, and I

Re: Re: Please force in kdeaddons

2006-01-05 Thread Filipus Klutiero
It would be nice to know what's the planned fix for these packages, unless hppa is to be ignored soon. If forcing each package is the preferred way, while kdeaddons is the most important to force so that kde finally gets installable again, kdevelop3 is missing since a long time, and it could be

Re: varconf and atlas-cpp are tied up with wfmath

2006-01-05 Thread Steve Langasek
On Thu, Jan 05, 2006 at 01:03:41AM -0500, Nathanael Nerode wrote: And they're all separate roots of the tree, none depending on any other. So the solo hint for wfmath is unlikely to work. Try Actually, it went in just fine today; it just needed old binaries from eris to be rene'd from

Re: binNMU of camlimages needed on sparc

2006-01-05 Thread Steve Langasek
On Wed, Jan 04, 2006 at 06:48:24AM +0100, Julien Cristau wrote: a bug similar to 344688 seems to affect camlimages on sparc: $ ocamlopt -I +camlimages ci_core.cmxa ci_tiff.cmxa test.ml /usr/lib/ocaml/3.09.0/camlimages/libci_tiff.a(tiffwrite.o): In function `open_tiff_file_for_write':

Let's remove tkrat from testing

2006-01-05 Thread Nathanael Nerode
Long-standing RC bugs 259324, 344981 (missing dependencies); maintainer appears to be out to lunch and nobody else appears to care enough to NMU. Unchanged since sarge. remove tkrat/1:2.1.4-2 -- Nathanael Nerode [EMAIL PROTECTED] [Insert famous quote here] -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to

Re: Developer accessible SPARC machine

2006-01-05 Thread Andrew Pollock
On Wed, Jan 04, 2006 at 12:22:57AM -0800, Steve Langasek wrote: Hi Andrew, On Tue, Jan 03, 2006 at 04:35:30PM -0800, Andrew Pollock wrote: I note that one of the issues with the Sparc port is the the lack of a developer accessible machine. At present, vore.debian.org is back on line;

Re: Developer accessible SPARC machine

2006-01-05 Thread Steve Langasek
On Fri, Jan 06, 2006 at 05:13:54PM +1000, Andrew Pollock wrote: On Wed, Jan 04, 2006 at 12:22:57AM -0800, Steve Langasek wrote: Hi Andrew, On Tue, Jan 03, 2006 at 04:35:30PM -0800, Andrew Pollock wrote: I note that one of the issues with the Sparc port is the the lack of a developer