On Thu, Oct 26, 2006 at 02:33:38PM +0200, Josselin Mouette wrote:
> Unless this is an issue for d-i, could you please allow udev 0.100-2.1
> in testing? The only change is a fix for #369479 which introduces
> prompting with debconf.
This package uses debconf for prompting in the preinst, but does
* Andreas Hoenen ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) [061026 21:44]:
> On Wed, 25 Oct 2006 21:17:10 +0200 Frank =?iso-8859-1?Q?K=FCster?= wrote:
> >Marc 'HE' Brockschmidt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> >>> - The problems mentioned later in #327616 by Andreas Hoehnen, the fact
> >>> that the PS documentation ca
On Wed, 25 Oct 2006 21:17:10 +0200 Frank =?iso-8859-1?Q?K=FCster?= wrote:
>Marc 'HE' Brockschmidt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>>> - The problems mentioned later in #327616 by Andreas Hoehnen, the fact
>>> that the PS documentation cannot be created, is not an issue: cdbs
>>> does not want to c
Frans Pop wrote:
> On Thursday 26 October 2006 08:00, Kenshi Muto wrote:
unblock ttf-cjk-compact/1.7
>
>> Now as far as I can see, all 4 languages (Japanese, Korean, Chinese
>> simplified and Chinese traditional) show correctly.
>
> With that, no objections.
>
> RMs: please hint.
Done.
Ch
On Wed, 2006-10-25 at 19:23 -0700, Steve Langasek wrote:
> Er, I'm happy to see that this version is now available in experimental, but
> why have you changed the names of *all* the packages, *including* the source
> package?
To answer the "why" question: At the start of this project, I didn't
wan
Unless this is an issue for d-i, could you please allow udev 0.100-2.1
in testing? The only change is a fix for #369479 which introduces
prompting with debconf.
--
Josselin Mouette/\./\
"Do you have any more insane proposals for me?"
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED
On Thu, Oct 26, 2006 at 01:13:17PM +0200, Simon Josefsson wrote:
> Look at:
> http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=365201
> There are no indications that it has the 'nonfree-doc rfc' usertags
> set. Is that correct?
Seems like a question you should ask the bts maintainers.
--
Stev
On Thursday 26 October 2006 08:00, Kenshi Muto wrote:
> > > unblock ttf-cjk-compact/1.7
> Now as far as I can see, all 4 languages (Japanese, Korean, Chinese
> simplified and Chinese traditional) show correctly.
With that, no objections.
RMs: please hint.
pgplFcfIIjuQl.pgp
Description: PGP sig
Shouldn't the usertags be visible on the actual bug report?
Look at:
http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=365201
There are no indications that it has the 'nonfree-doc rfc' usertags
set. Is that correct?
If you look at (sorry about long URL):
http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/pkgrepor
Hi,
Summary:
please requeue qbankmanager 0.9.38-2 on arm
qbankmanager 0.9.38-2 isn't build on arm (and m68k, but it's need-build
there) after 11 days in unstable. There has been an unsuccesful attempt
due to libqt3-mt-dev-uninstallability on arm. Looking at debcheck,
libqt3-mt-dev seems to be i
Marc 'HE' Brockschmidt wrote:
> Yes, I think this would be a good idea. Peter, could you do this or
> do you of a reason to postpone this change?
It's on its way.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On 2006-10-14 Andreas Barth <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> * Andreas Metzler ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) [061014 13:55]:
>> Hello,
>> it has been pointed out to me on IRC that debian/copyright needs to
>> actually contain a copy of used licenses not shipped in
>> /usr/share/common-licenses/, saying "complete
Steve Langasek <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> On Thu, Oct 26, 2006 at 11:14:32AM +0200, Simon Josefsson wrote:
>
>> > This appears to be a consequence of 395208. :/
>
>> > According to the outcome of that bug, the tags will have to be readded by
>> > hand...
>
>> Ok, I'll re-add all debian-release@
On Thu, Oct 26, 2006 at 11:14:32AM +0200, Simon Josefsson wrote:
> > This appears to be a consequence of 395208. :/
> > According to the outcome of that bug, the tags will have to be readded by
> > hand...
> Ok, I'll re-add all debian-release@lists.debian.org usertag
> nonfree-doc tags, based on
Steve Langasek <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> On Wed, Oct 25, 2006 at 09:41:50PM +0200, Simon Josefsson wrote:
>> I've noticed that user tags for debian-release@lists.debian.org went
>> missing yesterday, try the 'Status page in the BTS' link on:
>
>> http://release.debian.org/removing-non-free-doc
> >> This was fixed in 2.6.17.
>
> > First I've ever heard about it. The kernel cross-builds just fine.
> > kernel-package might hiccup, though.
>
> Do you have examples of such hiccups?
No. Please note the 'might' above :-).
I do not use kernel-package. No offense meant, but I never got
On 2006-10-26 Steve Langasek <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
[...]
> Er, I'm happy to see that this version is now available in experimental, but
> why have you changed the names of *all* the packages, *including* the source
> package? This is totally unnecessary archive churn and archive bloat
[...]
>
17 matches
Mail list logo
