* Raphael Hertzog ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) [070323 22:12]:
On Fri, 23 Mar 2007, Frans Pop wrote:
- aptitude dist-upgrade
Note that AFAICT --with-recommends is not honored with an 'aptitude
dist-upgrade' - it will still list the same packages as recommended but
will not be installed. No
* Steve Langasek ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) [070324 01:12]:
On Fri, Mar 23, 2007 at 06:52:15PM +0100, Frans Pop wrote:
- making sure openoffice does not get removed
Shouldn't it be easier to get it removed and the reinstall it?
Same arguments as earlier.
Problem with openoffice.org is
On Thu, Mar 22, 2007 at 12:33:14PM +0100, Javier Fernández-Sanguino Peña wrote:
On Wed, Mar 21, 2007 at 04:22:31PM -0700, Steve Langasek wrote:
This is not essential as long as you don't try to reboot before a new
kernel has been installed.
My concern here is: what happens if an
On Fri, Mar 23, 2007 at 07:15:43PM +0100, Frans Pop wrote:
And even then my tests have so far shown that the system will
probably still boot (though X may not start).
And will the networking necessarily start? That could be a problem for
a number of users if it doesn't.
I don't have
On Wed, Mar 21, 2007 at 02:37:42PM +, Marcin Owsiany wrote:
The following low/medium severity security issues have recently been
identified in ekg. (The numbers are cvsps patchsets which fixed the
problem in upstream CVS.)
2661: A memory leak in handling image messages, which may cause
On Sun, Mar 25, 2007 at 12:37:25PM +0100, Marcin Owsiany wrote:
I would like to use 1:1.7~rc2-2 and upload to unstable with
urgency=high. Then, if the release team would let this propagate to
frozen, we would have a single upload taking care of both sid and etch
(there would be no other
yasm 0.5.0-2 fixes a crash with some specific files.
--
Sam.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Hi
I would like you to unblock a couple of packages.
* harden
Translation update
* dpsyco
Fix for two checks
* horde3
SECURITY: Insecure usage of /tmp
* imp4
SECURITY: XSS vulnerability fixed
Regards,
// Ola
--
- Ola Lundqvist ---
/
# dpkg -s libsasl2
Package: libsasl2
Status: install ok installed
Priority: important
Section: libs
Installed-Size: 72
Maintainer: Debian Cyrus SASL Team [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Architecture: i386
Source: cyrus-sasl2
Version: 2.1.22.dfsg1-8
Depends: libsasl2-2 (= 2.1.22.dfsg1-8)
Description:
Hi,
Please let tig 0.5-3 migrate to Etch. It only fixes the version number
reported by tig --version (#409095) and adds a watch file.
Thanks in advance.
Cheers,
Sebastian
--
Sebastian tokkee Harl
GnuPG-ID: 0x8501C7FC
http://tokkee.org/
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
Hello,
I upgraded my desktop system last night from sarge to etch, and at the
end it went very well. After a single reboot the new kernel, xorg, and
KDE came up. Impressive that it run for hours and it came in a very
usable state.
There have been a few glitches during the upgrade though, which I
hi,
please allow zabbix 1.1.4-10 throgh t-p-u, fix for serious bug (one liner
to postinst scripts):
zabbix (1:1.1.4-10) testing-proposed-updates; urgency=high
.
* debian/zabbix-server-{mysql,pgsql}.postinst: run dbc_go after creating the
system zabbix user. (Closes: #415745)
bye,
ar wrote:
Hi,
I installed Debian Etch with debian-installer RC2 and Xfce.
When I boot the computer, the screen resolution is very low
on login screen and also on xfce (maybe 640x480 or something).
When I press Ctrl Alt Backspace to restart the X Server, then the
resolution turns to the
On Sun, Mar 25, 2007 at 03:12:27PM +0200, Santiago Vila wrote:
# dpkg -s libsasl2
Package: libsasl2
Status: install ok installed
Priority: important
Section: libs
Installed-Size: 72
Maintainer: Debian Cyrus SASL Team [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Architecture: i386
Source: cyrus-sasl2
Version:
http://bjorn.haxx.se/debian/testing.pl?package=gtkgrepmail says:
* trying to update gtkgrepmail from 1.0-1 to 1.1-1 (candidate is 46 days
old)
* gtkgrepmail is in freeze; contact debian-release if update is needed
Please update, since 1.0-1 is absolutely unusable in my case.
Thank you
--
To
On Saturday 24 March 2007 01:11, Steve Langasek wrote:
Uhm? Do I understand that you're suggesting using apt-get instead of
aptitude to *avoid* aptitude's automated handling of packages that one
would want to have removed? That doesn't make sense to me.
Only in the context of method B, which
On Saturday 24 March 2007 02:58, Steve Langasek wrote:
If I do an aptitude remove hotplug at this point, it tries to remove
the desktop task.
I gather that you didn't see this behavior. Which kernel were you
upgrading from in your test?
For a desktop installation the procedure works for me
On Sun, Mar 25, 2007 at 03:12:27PM +0200, Santiago Vila wrote:
# dpkg -s libsasl2
Package: libsasl2
Status: install ok installed
Priority: important
Section: libs
Installed-Size: 72
Maintainer: Debian Cyrus SASL Team [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Architecture: i386
Source: cyrus-sasl2
Version:
Hi Rainer,
On Sun, Mar 25, 2007 at 04:52:24PM +0200, Rainer Dorsch wrote:
I upgraded my desktop system last night from sarge to etch, and at the
end it went very well. After a single reboot the new kernel, xorg, and
KDE came up. Impressive that it run for hours and it came in a very
usable
On Sun, Mar 25, 2007 at 06:22:45PM +0200, Michael Ablassmeier wrote:
please allow zabbix 1.1.4-10 throgh t-p-u, fix for serious bug (one liner
to postinst scripts):
The package is missing a powerpc autobuild.
--
Steve Langasek Give me a lever long enough and a Free OS
On Sun, Mar 25, 2007 at 15:01:53 -0700, Steve Langasek wrote:
I don't suppose you have a /var/lib/aptitude/pkgstates from before the
upgrade? I don't really expect a particular aptitude upgrade failure to be
reproducible using just a package list.
There is a daily backup of this file in
On Sun, Mar 25, 2007 at 03:20:17AM -0700, Steve Langasek wrote:
No, see the mail I sent previously, many things can go wrong after an
upgrade
and new kernel install: LILO, udev and device reordering might make a
system
unbootable before (and even after) the kernel upgrade.
Right.
On Monday 26 March 2007 00:29, Javier Fernández-Sanguino Peña wrote:
Yes, that's the works situation. I think it might make sense to tell
users to have a 2.4 failback kernel for those situations (so they can
continue the upgrade)
If a 2.4 kernel works at all on their system...
On Mon, Mar 26, 2007 at 12:29:43AM +0200, Javier Fernández-Sanguino Peña wrote:
On Sun, Mar 25, 2007 at 03:20:17AM -0700, Steve Langasek wrote:
No, see the mail I sent previously, many things can go wrong after an
upgrade
and new kernel install: LILO, udev and device reordering might
Tired of Yo--Yo Dieting?
Do you want the right products and a calorie-controlled program
and support to achieve your goal?
A simple cost effective solution is at hand
http://www.slimnow.pro.tc
On Sun, 2007-03-25 at 14:12 -0400, Roberto C. Sánchez wrote:
I think that this has to do with the overrides that are in place.
[...]
So, maybe the priority can be adjusted, but it is in the oldlibs section
in our svn repo. I believe that Fabian has made more than request for
the
26 matches
Mail list logo
