severity 464019 important
tags 464019 + wontfix
thanks
On Feb 10, 2008 3:54 AM, Steve Langasek [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Bug #464019 should be resolved - either by changing the package name of
libmrss0, or by closing the bug as a wontfix - before these packages
should be binNMUed; otherwise I
Hi Steve,
Thanks for your thorough comments. I am not going to reply to all of them
because I think there is a misunderstanding here:
* Steve Langasek [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2008-02-09 10:53]:
On Mon, Feb 04, 2008 at 02:42:29PM +0100, Rafael Laboissiere wrote:
As I wrote above, it will be a
Dear release managers,
could you please rebuild lprof to make it depend on libvigraimpex2ldbl
instead of libvigraimpex2 ?
# apt-get install lprof
Reading package lists... Done
Building dependency tree
Reading state information... Done
The following extra packages will be installed:
Hi,
The paintlib2c2a-dbg package is empty on all architectures that built
paintlib with cdbs 0.4.50, ie. !sparc, because of #462130.
Could you please schedule a binNMU on other archs?
Thanks
Varun
--
Varun Hiremath
Undergraduate Student,
Aerospace Engineering Department,
Indian Institute of
Greetings,
Why not just use the whole library version in the soname and package
name? For example, libsuitesparse has lib*.so.3.1.0 which is the
soname, and forget about .so.3 . Then the soname and package name
match, so lintian is happy, and if upstream changes the interface
between 3.1.0 and
Dash has a serious bug which is causing grief.
The problem is that it overrides the system's test command (in
Debian, /usr/bin/test and /usr/bin/[) and does so in a way which is
inconsistent with the Debian versions.
Nothing in Posix permits this behavior, but it is tolerated by the
standard
On Sun, Feb 10, 2008 at 06:16:44PM +, Thomas Bushnell BSG wrote:
Dash has a serious bug which is causing grief.
[ strip whining ]
Alas, dash does change the syntax of the command.
[ whine whine whine ]
What is that change please ? Last time I checked dash supported the
proper POSIX
Thomas Bushnell BSG [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Dash has a serious bug which is causing grief.
The problem is that it overrides the system's test command (in
Debian, /usr/bin/test and /usr/bin/[) and does so in a way which is
inconsistent with the Debian versions.
Onlookers should see
On Sun, 2008-02-10 at 10:57 -0800, Russ Allbery wrote:
Thomas Bushnell BSG [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Dash has a serious bug which is causing grief.
The problem is that it overrides the system's test command (in
Debian, /usr/bin/test and /usr/bin/[) and does so in a way which is
On Sun, 2008-02-10 at 19:58 +0100, Pierre Habouzit wrote:
On Sun, Feb 10, 2008 at 06:16:44PM +, Thomas Bushnell BSG wrote:
Dash has a serious bug which is causing grief.
[ strip whining ]
Alas, dash does change the syntax of the command.
[ whine whine whine ]
What is
Pierre Habouzit wrote:
On Sun, Feb 10, 2008 at 06:16:44PM +, Thomas Bushnell BSG wrote:
Dash has a serious bug which is causing grief.
[ strip whining ]
Alas, dash does change the syntax of the command.
[ whine whine whine ]
What is that change please ? Last time I checked
On Sun, Feb 10, 2008 at 06:57:51PM +, Russ Allbery wrote:
Thomas Bushnell BSG [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Dash has a serious bug which is causing grief.
The problem is that it overrides the system's test command (in
Debian, /usr/bin/test and /usr/bin/[) and does so in a way which is
On Sun, 2008-02-10 at 10:57 -0800, Russ Allbery wrote:
Thomas Bushnell BSG [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Dash has a serious bug which is causing grief.
The problem is that it overrides the system's test command (in
Debian, /usr/bin/test and /usr/bin/[) and does so in a way which is
On Sun, Feb 10, 2008 at 07:29:28PM +, Pierre Habouzit wrote:
How come no-one even *bothered* to check.
For the google impaired, you can find the specification here:
http://www.opengroup.org/onlinepubs/95399/utilities/test.html
And yes, I think it'd be a reasonable thing to ask our
Varun Hiremath [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
The paintlib2c2a-dbg package is empty on all architectures that built
paintlib with cdbs 0.4.50, ie. !sparc, because of #462130.
I just went through all the dozen or so -dbg packages built with debhelper
(=6) and cdbs, and the only other victim I found was
On Sun, 2008-02-10 at 11:26 -0800, Mike Bird wrote:
On Sun February 10 2008 10:16:44 Thomas Bushnell BSG wrote:
Shells can override commands, but only if they don't play games with the
syntax.
Agreed. Within the Debian world, dash has redefined test rather
than building in test.
On Sun, Feb 10, 2008 at 12:26:35PM +0100, Laurent Bonnaud wrote:
Dear release managers,
could you please rebuild lprof to make it depend on libvigraimpex2ldbl
instead of libvigraimpex2 ?
Scheduled.
Cheers,
--
Steve Langasek Give me a lever long enough and a Free OS
Debian
On Sun February 10 2008 15:54:36 Thomas Bushnell BSG wrote:
Or to follow Colin's suggestion from the policy discussion a few years
ago, and grant a special exception, carefully crafted, for particular
shell builtins. I have no objection to that solution.
As a Debian user rather than a DD I
On Fri, Apr 13, 2007 at 12:46:30PM +1000, Drew Parsons wrote:
On Fri, 2007-04-13 at 11:38 +1000, Aníbal Monsalve Salazar wrote:
On Fri, Apr 13, 2007 at 11:06:19AM +1000, Drew Parsons wrote:
A long-standing bug which should be thought about is the GL licensing
problem [1]. SGI kindly contributed
Raphael Geissert [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
I just replied to Thomas on the bug report including some information
that demonstrates that his arguments on dash not implementing some (at
least the one mentioned on the report) /usr/bin/test features is not
valid. For further reference please see
I forwarded that information internaly to my manager about a week ago
(after a discution with jcristeau), I believe that the message is:
* If it affects only Debian SGI (as a corporation) will not care and
treat us as a bunch of nitpickers hippies.
(julien sent me a link I can't find now where
On Sun, Feb 10, 2008 at 09:07:53PM +0530, Varun Hiremath wrote:
The paintlib2c2a-dbg package is empty on all architectures that built
paintlib with cdbs 0.4.50, ie. !sparc, because of #462130.
Could you please schedule a binNMU on other archs?
BinNMUs scheduled for paintlib 2.6.2-14. In the
On Sun, 2008-02-10 at 19:36 -0800, Russ Allbery wrote:
Raphael Geissert [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
I just replied to Thomas on the bug report including some information
that demonstrates that his arguments on dash not implementing some (at
least the one mentioned on the report)
23 matches
Mail list logo
