A few give-backs on alpha

2009-02-27 Thread Arthur Loiret
Hi, Here are a few packages which should build fine on alpha, now that the following packages are available on alpha: libglib2.0-dev 2.18.4-2 libgnome2-dev 2.20.1.1-2 libgnomeui-dev 2.20.1.1-2 libgconf2-4 2.24.0-7 libwxgtk2.8-0 2.8.7.1-1.1 python-gnome2-extras 2.19.1-3.1 The packages to

Re: A few give-backs on alpha

2009-02-27 Thread Philipp Kern
On Fri, Feb 27, 2009 at 01:27:22PM +0100, Arthur Loiret wrote: The packages to give-back are: Thanks for using the syntax. Done. Kind regards, Philipp Kern -- .''`. Philipp KernDebian Developer : :' : http://philkern.de Release Assistant `.

Please unblock glib2.0 and gtk+2.0

2009-02-27 Thread Josselin Mouette
Hi, glib2.0 and gtk+2.0 should be ready to migrate to squeeze today. Since they contain udebs, they need manual handling. Could you please unblock them? After that, the road is open for GTK+ 2.14 in unstable and GTK+ 2.12.12 in lenny, as discussed before. Cheers, -- .''`. Debian 5.0

Please schedule binNMU of lablgtk2/2.12.0-2 on i386

2009-02-27 Thread Stéphane Glondu
Hi, The uploaded version of lablgtk2, compiled on i386, has been mistakenly compiled against the gtk2 version of experimental, making it uninstallable on i386. Would someone be kind enough to schedule a binNMU for it? lablgtk2_2.12.0-2, Rebuild against gtk2 in sid, 1, i386 BTW, I fail to

Re: Please schedule binNMU of lablgtk2/2.12.0-2 on i386

2009-02-27 Thread Adeodato Simó
* Stéphane Glondu [Fri, 27 Feb 2009 14:20:40 +0100]: Hi, The uploaded version of lablgtk2, compiled on i386, has been mistakenly compiled against the gtk2 version of experimental, making it uninstallable on i386. Would someone be kind enough to schedule a binNMU for it? lablgtk2_2.12.0-2,

Re: A few give-backs on alpha

2009-02-27 Thread Rafael Laboissiere
* Philipp Kern pk...@debian.org [2009-02-27 13:42]: On Fri, Feb 27, 2009 at 01:27:22PM +0100, Arthur Loiret wrote: The packages to give-back are: Thanks for using the syntax. Done. I keep forgetting this. Where can I find the specification for the syntax? Thanks, -- Rafael -- To

Re: A few give-backs on alpha

2009-02-27 Thread Philipp Kern
On Fri, Feb 27, 2009 at 04:08:43PM +0100, Rafael Laboissiere wrote: * Philipp Kern pk...@debian.org [2009-02-27 13:42]: On Fri, Feb 27, 2009 at 01:27:22PM +0100, Arthur Loiret wrote: The packages to give-back are: Thanks for using the syntax. Done. I keep forgetting this. Where can I

Re: Can libweather-com-perl get updated in stable?

2009-02-27 Thread Christoph Haas
On Samstag, 21. Februar 2009, Luk Claes wrote: Christoph Haas wrote: I have just updated the libweather-com-perl package [0] because since beginning of May it has stopped working due to a protocol change of the used internet service. The fix is a one-line patch between 0.5.3-1.1 and

Re: Can libweather-com-perl get updated in stable?

2009-02-27 Thread Luk Claes
Christoph Haas wrote: On Samstag, 21. Februar 2009, Luk Claes wrote: Christoph Haas wrote: I have just updated the libweather-com-perl package [0] because since beginning of May it has stopped working due to a protocol change of the used internet service. The fix is a one-line patch between

library transition proposal libosip2 (was: library transition proposal libortp/ liblinphone)

2009-02-27 Thread Mark Purcell
On Tuesday 24 February 2009 10:42:26 Mark Purcell wrote: liblinphone2 - liblinphone3 libortp7 - libortp8 Looks like I also have another transition to precede libortp. libosip2-3deb - libosip2-4 libosip2-3deb Reverse Depends: linphone-nox liblinphone3 siproxd siproxd linphone-nox

libphysfs 1.0.1

2009-02-27 Thread Barry deFreese
Hi folks, I would like to upload libphysfs 1.0.1 to unstable. It is a soname change. You are all CC'd because you have a package that build-depends on it. I will attempt to test build all of the packages but if any of you know or could build your own for me it would be greatly

Re: libphysfs 1.0.1

2009-02-27 Thread Paul Wise
On Sat, Feb 28, 2009 at 9:41 AM, Barry deFreese bdefre...@debian.org wrote: I hope to get it uploaded by the end of March.  Here are the packages that are affected: ... warzone2100 Upstream informs me that both libphysfs 1.0.1 and 1.1.1 should be fine for warzone2100. -- bye, pabs

Re: libphysfs 1.0.1 vs lincity-ng

2009-02-27 Thread Alain Baeckeroot
Le 28/02/2009 à 01:41, Barry deFreese a écrit : Hi folks, I would like to upload libphysfs 1.0.1 to unstable. It is a soname change. You are all CC'd because you have a package that build-depends on it. I will attempt to test build all of the packages but if any of you know or could